Local economies and household spacing in early chiefdom communities.

Archaeological research has by now revealed a great deal of variation in the way early complex societies, or chiefdoms, developed. This variation is widely recognized, but our understanding of the forces that produced it remains relatively undeveloped. This paper takes aim at such understanding by e...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: C Adam Berrey, Robert D Drennan, Christian E Peterson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e87139f9e6c54f55ad7355ca296ceb5e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e87139f9e6c54f55ad7355ca296ceb5e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e87139f9e6c54f55ad7355ca296ceb5e2021-12-02T20:11:13ZLocal economies and household spacing in early chiefdom communities.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0252532https://doaj.org/article/e87139f9e6c54f55ad7355ca296ceb5e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252532https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Archaeological research has by now revealed a great deal of variation in the way early complex societies, or chiefdoms, developed. This variation is widely recognized, but our understanding of the forces that produced it remains relatively undeveloped. This paper takes aim at such understanding by exploring variation in the local economies of six early chiefdoms; it considers what implications this variation had for trajectories of chiefdom development, as well as the source of that variation. Economic exchange is a primary form of local interaction in all societies. Because of distance-interaction principles, closer household spacing within local communities facilitated more frequent interaction and thus encouraged productive differentiation, economic interdependence, and the development of well-integrated local economies. Well-integrated local economies, in turn, provided ready opportunities for aspiring leaders to accumulate wealth and fund political economies, and pursuit of these opportunities led to societies with leaders whose power had a direct economic base. Wider household spacing, on the other hand, impeded interaction and the development of well-integrated local economies. In such contexts, aspiring leaders were able to turn to ritual and religion as a base of social power. Even when well-integrated local economies offered opportunities for wealth accumulation and a ready source of funding for political economies, these opportunities were not always taken advantage of. That variation in the shapes of early chiefdoms can be traced back to patterns of household spacing highlights the importance of settlement and interaction in explaining not just chiefdom development, but societal change more generally.C Adam BerreyRobert D DrennanChristian E PetersonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e0252532 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
C Adam Berrey
Robert D Drennan
Christian E Peterson
Local economies and household spacing in early chiefdom communities.
description Archaeological research has by now revealed a great deal of variation in the way early complex societies, or chiefdoms, developed. This variation is widely recognized, but our understanding of the forces that produced it remains relatively undeveloped. This paper takes aim at such understanding by exploring variation in the local economies of six early chiefdoms; it considers what implications this variation had for trajectories of chiefdom development, as well as the source of that variation. Economic exchange is a primary form of local interaction in all societies. Because of distance-interaction principles, closer household spacing within local communities facilitated more frequent interaction and thus encouraged productive differentiation, economic interdependence, and the development of well-integrated local economies. Well-integrated local economies, in turn, provided ready opportunities for aspiring leaders to accumulate wealth and fund political economies, and pursuit of these opportunities led to societies with leaders whose power had a direct economic base. Wider household spacing, on the other hand, impeded interaction and the development of well-integrated local economies. In such contexts, aspiring leaders were able to turn to ritual and religion as a base of social power. Even when well-integrated local economies offered opportunities for wealth accumulation and a ready source of funding for political economies, these opportunities were not always taken advantage of. That variation in the shapes of early chiefdoms can be traced back to patterns of household spacing highlights the importance of settlement and interaction in explaining not just chiefdom development, but societal change more generally.
format article
author C Adam Berrey
Robert D Drennan
Christian E Peterson
author_facet C Adam Berrey
Robert D Drennan
Christian E Peterson
author_sort C Adam Berrey
title Local economies and household spacing in early chiefdom communities.
title_short Local economies and household spacing in early chiefdom communities.
title_full Local economies and household spacing in early chiefdom communities.
title_fullStr Local economies and household spacing in early chiefdom communities.
title_full_unstemmed Local economies and household spacing in early chiefdom communities.
title_sort local economies and household spacing in early chiefdom communities.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e87139f9e6c54f55ad7355ca296ceb5e
work_keys_str_mv AT cadamberrey localeconomiesandhouseholdspacinginearlychiefdomcommunities
AT robertddrennan localeconomiesandhouseholdspacinginearlychiefdomcommunities
AT christianepeterson localeconomiesandhouseholdspacinginearlychiefdomcommunities
_version_ 1718374916464574464