Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared

Raffaele Nuzzi, Simona Scalabrin, Alice Becco Eye Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, ItalyCorrespondence: Raffaele NuzziEye Clinic of University of Turin, Turin, ItalyTel +39 0116337225Fax +39 0116335481Email prof.n...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nuzzi R, Scalabrin S, Becco A
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e8757490b3e846c9818cb92563c67cb8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e8757490b3e846c9818cb92563c67cb8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e8757490b3e846c9818cb92563c67cb82021-12-02T11:03:32ZReduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/e8757490b3e846c9818cb92563c67cb82020-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/reduction-of-intraocular-pressure-spikes-due-to-intravitreal-bevacizum-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Raffaele Nuzzi, Simona Scalabrin, Alice Becco Eye Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, ItalyCorrespondence: Raffaele NuzziEye Clinic of University of Turin, Turin, ItalyTel +39 0116337225Fax +39 0116335481Email prof.nuzzi_raffaele@hotmail.itPurpose: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different decompressive injection techniques in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes, if compared to the injection without pressure applied on the eye, following the intravitreal injection of bevacizumab.Patients and Methods: Two hundred patients with indication to intravitreal therapy were randomized into five arms: 40 received intravitreal injection without ocular decompression (arm A), 40 with pre-injection scleral indentation with cotton swab (arm B), 40 with pre-injection digital ocular massage (arm C), 40 with post-injection scleral indentation with cotton swab (arm D) and 40 with post-injection digital ocular massage (arm E). All patients underwent measurement of the IOP with Goldamm applanation tonometer 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the injection. The primary endpoint of the study was variation of the post- injection IOP with the different techniques.Results: An increase in post-injection IOP was observed in all the arms, if compared to pre-injection values. The greatest increase was observed in arm A with a mean IOP rise of 17.60 mmHg. All other techniques showed lower mean IOP increases: arm B 10.76 mmHg, arm C 9.35 mmHg, arm D 8.8 mmHg, arm E 3.4 mmHg. The post-injection IOP differences of innovative techniques compared to the technique without ocular decompression were all statistically significant (p-value < 0.01). If compared to arm A (35%), a reduction in IOP spike ≥ 40 mmHg frequency was also observed. The status of phakia/pseudophakia, a previous diagnosis of glaucoma and the underlying pathology for which indication was given to inject bevacizumab did not significantly alter the post-injection IOP in any of the protocols.Conclusion: The introduction of new injection protocols, such as injections performed before or after decompressive treatments, could be a safe and effective approach to control post-injection IOP increase.Keywords: bevacizumab injection, injection technique, intraocular pressure spike, digital ocular massage, scleral indentation, applanation tonometryNuzzi RScalabrin SBecco ADove Medical Pressarticlebevacizumab injectioninjection techniqueintraocular pressure spikedigital ocular massagescleral indentationapplanation tonometryOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 14, Pp 2533-2541 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic bevacizumab injection
injection technique
intraocular pressure spike
digital ocular massage
scleral indentation
applanation tonometry
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle bevacizumab injection
injection technique
intraocular pressure spike
digital ocular massage
scleral indentation
applanation tonometry
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Nuzzi R
Scalabrin S
Becco A
Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
description Raffaele Nuzzi, Simona Scalabrin, Alice Becco Eye Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, ItalyCorrespondence: Raffaele NuzziEye Clinic of University of Turin, Turin, ItalyTel +39 0116337225Fax +39 0116335481Email prof.nuzzi_raffaele@hotmail.itPurpose: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different decompressive injection techniques in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes, if compared to the injection without pressure applied on the eye, following the intravitreal injection of bevacizumab.Patients and Methods: Two hundred patients with indication to intravitreal therapy were randomized into five arms: 40 received intravitreal injection without ocular decompression (arm A), 40 with pre-injection scleral indentation with cotton swab (arm B), 40 with pre-injection digital ocular massage (arm C), 40 with post-injection scleral indentation with cotton swab (arm D) and 40 with post-injection digital ocular massage (arm E). All patients underwent measurement of the IOP with Goldamm applanation tonometer 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the injection. The primary endpoint of the study was variation of the post- injection IOP with the different techniques.Results: An increase in post-injection IOP was observed in all the arms, if compared to pre-injection values. The greatest increase was observed in arm A with a mean IOP rise of 17.60 mmHg. All other techniques showed lower mean IOP increases: arm B 10.76 mmHg, arm C 9.35 mmHg, arm D 8.8 mmHg, arm E 3.4 mmHg. The post-injection IOP differences of innovative techniques compared to the technique without ocular decompression were all statistically significant (p-value < 0.01). If compared to arm A (35%), a reduction in IOP spike ≥ 40 mmHg frequency was also observed. The status of phakia/pseudophakia, a previous diagnosis of glaucoma and the underlying pathology for which indication was given to inject bevacizumab did not significantly alter the post-injection IOP in any of the protocols.Conclusion: The introduction of new injection protocols, such as injections performed before or after decompressive treatments, could be a safe and effective approach to control post-injection IOP increase.Keywords: bevacizumab injection, injection technique, intraocular pressure spike, digital ocular massage, scleral indentation, applanation tonometry
format article
author Nuzzi R
Scalabrin S
Becco A
author_facet Nuzzi R
Scalabrin S
Becco A
author_sort Nuzzi R
title Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title_short Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title_full Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title_fullStr Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Spikes Due to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections by Scleral Indentation with Cotton Swab or Digital Ocular Massage: Innovative Techniques Compared
title_sort reduction of intraocular pressure spikes due to intravitreal bevacizumab injections by scleral indentation with cotton swab or digital ocular massage: innovative techniques compared
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/e8757490b3e846c9818cb92563c67cb8
work_keys_str_mv AT nuzzir reductionofintraocularpressurespikesduetointravitrealbevacizumabinjectionsbyscleralindentationwithcottonswabordigitalocularmassageinnovativetechniquescompared
AT scalabrins reductionofintraocularpressurespikesduetointravitrealbevacizumabinjectionsbyscleralindentationwithcottonswabordigitalocularmassageinnovativetechniquescompared
AT beccoa reductionofintraocularpressurespikesduetointravitrealbevacizumabinjectionsbyscleralindentationwithcottonswabordigitalocularmassageinnovativetechniquescompared
_version_ 1718396326136250368