The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools

Livestock operations in California face livestock losses due to a range of carnivore species. Simultaneously, there is an increased call to reduce the use of lethal predator control methods and replace them with nonlethal methods. Livestock guardian dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are one such nonleth...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dan Macon, Carolyn Whitesell
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: California Department of Fish and Wildlife 2021
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e8810cff6eb847c28e6b607d5b424894
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e8810cff6eb847c28e6b607d5b424894
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e8810cff6eb847c28e6b607d5b4248942021-11-04T14:15:44ZThe case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools10.51492/cfwj.hwisi.32689-4203https://doaj.org/article/e8810cff6eb847c28e6b607d5b4248942021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2689-4203Livestock operations in California face livestock losses due to a range of carnivore species. Simultaneously, there is an increased call to reduce the use of lethal predator control methods and replace them with nonlethal methods. Livestock guardian dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are one such nonlethal livestock protection tool (LPT), yet research is still lacking on the factors and situations that impact their effectiveness. Using three case studies, we demonstrate the value of objective analyses that explicitly address the inherent differences in ranch management, environment, and surrounding land uses in examining livestock guardian dogs as an LPT. We used semi-structured questionnaire surveys of livestock operators to collect information on effectiveness, behavior, and producer satisfaction of LGDs protecting poultry (Gallus gallus domesticus), calves (Bovus taurus), and sheep (Ovis aries) on private and public land and in conjunction with a variety of other livestock protection tools. We aimed to address all aspects related to the use of LGDs as a means of informing livestock operators’ decisions on whether LGDs are an appropriate tool for a particular operation. The case studies demonstrated the complexities involved in applying LGDs as a LPT within the context of a livestock operation. In two of the three case studies, LGDs did not entirely eliminate livestock losses yet operator satisfaction remained high.Dan MaconCarolyn WhitesellCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlifearticlehuman-wildlife coexistencelivestock depredationlivestock guardian doglivestock protection toolsScienceQENCalifornia Fish and Wildlife Journal, Vol 107, Iss 3, Pp 173-183 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic human-wildlife coexistence
livestock depredation
livestock guardian dog
livestock protection tools
Science
Q
spellingShingle human-wildlife coexistence
livestock depredation
livestock guardian dog
livestock protection tools
Science
Q
Dan Macon
Carolyn Whitesell
The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
description Livestock operations in California face livestock losses due to a range of carnivore species. Simultaneously, there is an increased call to reduce the use of lethal predator control methods and replace them with nonlethal methods. Livestock guardian dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are one such nonlethal livestock protection tool (LPT), yet research is still lacking on the factors and situations that impact their effectiveness. Using three case studies, we demonstrate the value of objective analyses that explicitly address the inherent differences in ranch management, environment, and surrounding land uses in examining livestock guardian dogs as an LPT. We used semi-structured questionnaire surveys of livestock operators to collect information on effectiveness, behavior, and producer satisfaction of LGDs protecting poultry (Gallus gallus domesticus), calves (Bovus taurus), and sheep (Ovis aries) on private and public land and in conjunction with a variety of other livestock protection tools. We aimed to address all aspects related to the use of LGDs as a means of informing livestock operators’ decisions on whether LGDs are an appropriate tool for a particular operation. The case studies demonstrated the complexities involved in applying LGDs as a LPT within the context of a livestock operation. In two of the three case studies, LGDs did not entirely eliminate livestock losses yet operator satisfaction remained high.
format article
author Dan Macon
Carolyn Whitesell
author_facet Dan Macon
Carolyn Whitesell
author_sort Dan Macon
title The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
title_short The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
title_full The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
title_fullStr The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
title_full_unstemmed The case for case studies: A new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
title_sort case for case studies: a new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of livestock protection tools
publisher California Department of Fish and Wildlife
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e8810cff6eb847c28e6b607d5b424894
work_keys_str_mv AT danmacon thecaseforcasestudiesanewapproachtoevaluatingtheeffectivenessoflivestockprotectiontools
AT carolynwhitesell thecaseforcasestudiesanewapproachtoevaluatingtheeffectivenessoflivestockprotectiontools
AT danmacon caseforcasestudiesanewapproachtoevaluatingtheeffectivenessoflivestockprotectiontools
AT carolynwhitesell caseforcasestudiesanewapproachtoevaluatingtheeffectivenessoflivestockprotectiontools
_version_ 1718444874507747328