The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia
Lauren Yates1,*, Emese Csipke2,*, Esme Moniz-Cook3, Phuong Leung2, Holly Walton4, Georgina Charlesworth5, Aimee Spector5, Eef Hogervorst6, Gail Mountain7, Martin Orrell1 1Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; 2Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London,...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e8adb728524c4cb6b43097e052da356d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e8adb728524c4cb6b43097e052da356d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e8adb728524c4cb6b43097e052da356d2021-12-02T02:50:52ZThe development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/e8adb728524c4cb6b43097e052da356d2019-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/the-development-of-the-promoting-independence-in-dementia-pride-interv-peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Lauren Yates1,*, Emese Csipke2,*, Esme Moniz-Cook3, Phuong Leung2, Holly Walton4, Georgina Charlesworth5, Aimee Spector5, Eef Hogervorst6, Gail Mountain7, Martin Orrell1 1Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; 2Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; 3Department of Psychological Health and Well-Being, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Health and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, UK; 4Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK; 5Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; 6National Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK; 7Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Emese CsipkeDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7NF, UKTel +44 207 679 9306Email e.csipke@ucl.ac.ukObjective: Support after a diagnosis of dementia may facilitate better adjustment and ongoing management of symptoms. The aim of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) study was to develop a postdiagnostic social intervention to help people live as well and as independently as possible. The intervention facilitates engagement in evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical and social activities.Methods: Theories to promote adjustment to a dementia diagnosis, including theories of social learning and self-efficacy, were reviewed alongside self-management and the selective optimization model, to form the basis of the intervention. Analyses of two longitudinal databases of older adults, and qualitative analyses of interviews of older people, people with dementia, and their carers about their experiences of dementia, informed the content and focus of the intervention. Consensus expert review involving stakeholders was conducted to synthesize key components. Participants were sourced from the British NHS, voluntary services, and patient and public involvement groups. A tailored manual-based intervention was developed with the aim for this to be delivered by an intervention provider.Results: Evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical, and social activities that have been shown to benefit people were key components of the proposed PRIDE intervention. Thirty-two participants including people with dementia (n=4), carers (n=11), dementia advisers (n=14), and older people (n=3) provided feedback on the drafts of the intervention and manual. Seven topics for activities were included (eg, “making decisions” and “getting your message across”). The manual outlines delivery of the intervention over three sessions where personalized profiles and plans for up to three activities are developed, implemented, and reviewed.Conclusion: A manualized intervention was constructed based on robust methodology and found to be acceptable to participants. Consultations with stakeholders played a key role in shaping the manualized PRIDE intervention and its delivery. Unlike most social interventions for dementia, the target audience for our intervention is the people with dementia themselves.Keywords: self-management, public patient involvement, behavior change, manual, cognitive impairmentYates LCsipke EMoniz-Cook ELeung PWalton HCharlesworth GSpector AHogervorst EMountain GOrrell MDove Medical Pressarticleself-managementpublic patient involvementbehavior changemanualcognitive impairmentGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 14, Pp 1615-1630 (2019) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
self-management public patient involvement behavior change manual cognitive impairment Geriatrics RC952-954.6 |
spellingShingle |
self-management public patient involvement behavior change manual cognitive impairment Geriatrics RC952-954.6 Yates L Csipke E Moniz-Cook E Leung P Walton H Charlesworth G Spector A Hogervorst E Mountain G Orrell M The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia |
description |
Lauren Yates1,*, Emese Csipke2,*, Esme Moniz-Cook3, Phuong Leung2, Holly Walton4, Georgina Charlesworth5, Aimee Spector5, Eef Hogervorst6, Gail Mountain7, Martin Orrell1 1Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; 2Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; 3Department of Psychological Health and Well-Being, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Health and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, UK; 4Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK; 5Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; 6National Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK; 7Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Emese CsipkeDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7NF, UKTel +44 207 679 9306Email e.csipke@ucl.ac.ukObjective: Support after a diagnosis of dementia may facilitate better adjustment and ongoing management of symptoms. The aim of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) study was to develop a postdiagnostic social intervention to help people live as well and as independently as possible. The intervention facilitates engagement in evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical and social activities.Methods: Theories to promote adjustment to a dementia diagnosis, including theories of social learning and self-efficacy, were reviewed alongside self-management and the selective optimization model, to form the basis of the intervention. Analyses of two longitudinal databases of older adults, and qualitative analyses of interviews of older people, people with dementia, and their carers about their experiences of dementia, informed the content and focus of the intervention. Consensus expert review involving stakeholders was conducted to synthesize key components. Participants were sourced from the British NHS, voluntary services, and patient and public involvement groups. A tailored manual-based intervention was developed with the aim for this to be delivered by an intervention provider.Results: Evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical, and social activities that have been shown to benefit people were key components of the proposed PRIDE intervention. Thirty-two participants including people with dementia (n=4), carers (n=11), dementia advisers (n=14), and older people (n=3) provided feedback on the drafts of the intervention and manual. Seven topics for activities were included (eg, “making decisions” and “getting your message across”). The manual outlines delivery of the intervention over three sessions where personalized profiles and plans for up to three activities are developed, implemented, and reviewed.Conclusion: A manualized intervention was constructed based on robust methodology and found to be acceptable to participants. Consultations with stakeholders played a key role in shaping the manualized PRIDE intervention and its delivery. Unlike most social interventions for dementia, the target audience for our intervention is the people with dementia themselves.Keywords: self-management, public patient involvement, behavior change, manual, cognitive impairment |
format |
article |
author |
Yates L Csipke E Moniz-Cook E Leung P Walton H Charlesworth G Spector A Hogervorst E Mountain G Orrell M |
author_facet |
Yates L Csipke E Moniz-Cook E Leung P Walton H Charlesworth G Spector A Hogervorst E Mountain G Orrell M |
author_sort |
Yates L |
title |
The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia |
title_short |
The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia |
title_full |
The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia |
title_fullStr |
The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia |
title_full_unstemmed |
The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia |
title_sort |
development of the promoting independence in dementia (pride) intervention to enhance independence in dementia |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/e8adb728524c4cb6b43097e052da356d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yatesl thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT csipkee thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT monizcooke thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT leungp thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT waltonh thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT charlesworthg thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT spectora thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT hogervorste thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT mountaing thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT orrellm thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT yatesl developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT csipkee developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT monizcooke developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT leungp developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT waltonh developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT charlesworthg developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT spectora developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT hogervorste developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT mountaing developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia AT orrellm developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia |
_version_ |
1718402133739438080 |