The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia

Lauren Yates1,*, Emese Csipke2,*, Esme Moniz-Cook3, Phuong Leung2, Holly Walton4, Georgina Charlesworth5, Aimee Spector5, Eef Hogervorst6, Gail Mountain7, Martin Orrell1 1Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; 2Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yates L, Csipke E, Moniz-Cook E, Leung P, Walton H, Charlesworth G, Spector A, Hogervorst E, Mountain G, Orrell M
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e8adb728524c4cb6b43097e052da356d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e8adb728524c4cb6b43097e052da356d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e8adb728524c4cb6b43097e052da356d2021-12-02T02:50:52ZThe development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/e8adb728524c4cb6b43097e052da356d2019-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/the-development-of-the-promoting-independence-in-dementia-pride-interv-peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Lauren Yates1,*, Emese Csipke2,*, Esme Moniz-Cook3, Phuong Leung2, Holly Walton4, Georgina Charlesworth5, Aimee Spector5, Eef Hogervorst6, Gail Mountain7, Martin Orrell1 1Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; 2Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; 3Department of Psychological Health and Well-Being, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Health and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, UK; 4Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK; 5Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; 6National Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK; 7Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Emese CsipkeDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7NF, UKTel +44 207 679 9306Email e.csipke@ucl.ac.ukObjective: Support after a diagnosis of dementia may facilitate better adjustment and ongoing management of symptoms. The aim of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) study was to develop a postdiagnostic social intervention to help people live as well and as independently as possible. The intervention facilitates engagement in evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical and social activities.Methods: Theories to promote adjustment to a dementia diagnosis, including theories of social learning and self-efficacy, were reviewed alongside self-management and the selective optimization model, to form the basis of the intervention. Analyses of two longitudinal databases of older adults, and qualitative analyses of interviews of older people, people with dementia, and their carers about their experiences of dementia, informed the content and focus of the intervention. Consensus expert review involving stakeholders was conducted to synthesize key components. Participants were sourced from the British NHS, voluntary services, and patient and public involvement groups. A tailored manual-based intervention was developed with the aim for this to be delivered by an intervention provider.Results: Evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical, and social activities that have been shown to benefit people were key components of the proposed PRIDE intervention. Thirty-two participants including people with dementia (n=4), carers (n=11), dementia advisers (n=14), and older people (n=3) provided feedback on the drafts of the intervention and manual. Seven topics for activities were included (eg, “making decisions” and “getting your message across”). The manual outlines delivery of the intervention over three sessions where personalized profiles and plans for up to three activities are developed, implemented, and reviewed.Conclusion: A manualized intervention was constructed based on robust methodology and found to be acceptable to participants. Consultations with stakeholders played a key role in shaping the manualized PRIDE intervention and its delivery. Unlike most social interventions for dementia, the target audience for our intervention is the people with dementia themselves.Keywords: self-management, public patient involvement, behavior change, manual, cognitive impairmentYates LCsipke EMoniz-Cook ELeung PWalton HCharlesworth GSpector AHogervorst EMountain GOrrell MDove Medical Pressarticleself-managementpublic patient involvementbehavior changemanualcognitive impairmentGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 14, Pp 1615-1630 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic self-management
public patient involvement
behavior change
manual
cognitive impairment
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
spellingShingle self-management
public patient involvement
behavior change
manual
cognitive impairment
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
Yates L
Csipke E
Moniz-Cook E
Leung P
Walton H
Charlesworth G
Spector A
Hogervorst E
Mountain G
Orrell M
The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia
description Lauren Yates1,*, Emese Csipke2,*, Esme Moniz-Cook3, Phuong Leung2, Holly Walton4, Georgina Charlesworth5, Aimee Spector5, Eef Hogervorst6, Gail Mountain7, Martin Orrell1 1Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; 2Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; 3Department of Psychological Health and Well-Being, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Health and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, UK; 4Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK; 5Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; 6National Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK; 7Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Emese CsipkeDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7NF, UKTel +44 207 679 9306Email e.csipke@ucl.ac.ukObjective: Support after a diagnosis of dementia may facilitate better adjustment and ongoing management of symptoms. The aim of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) study was to develop a postdiagnostic social intervention to help people live as well and as independently as possible. The intervention facilitates engagement in evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical and social activities.Methods: Theories to promote adjustment to a dementia diagnosis, including theories of social learning and self-efficacy, were reviewed alongside self-management and the selective optimization model, to form the basis of the intervention. Analyses of two longitudinal databases of older adults, and qualitative analyses of interviews of older people, people with dementia, and their carers about their experiences of dementia, informed the content and focus of the intervention. Consensus expert review involving stakeholders was conducted to synthesize key components. Participants were sourced from the British NHS, voluntary services, and patient and public involvement groups. A tailored manual-based intervention was developed with the aim for this to be delivered by an intervention provider.Results: Evidence-based stimulating cognitive, physical, and social activities that have been shown to benefit people were key components of the proposed PRIDE intervention. Thirty-two participants including people with dementia (n=4), carers (n=11), dementia advisers (n=14), and older people (n=3) provided feedback on the drafts of the intervention and manual. Seven topics for activities were included (eg, “making decisions” and “getting your message across”). The manual outlines delivery of the intervention over three sessions where personalized profiles and plans for up to three activities are developed, implemented, and reviewed.Conclusion: A manualized intervention was constructed based on robust methodology and found to be acceptable to participants. Consultations with stakeholders played a key role in shaping the manualized PRIDE intervention and its delivery. Unlike most social interventions for dementia, the target audience for our intervention is the people with dementia themselves.Keywords: self-management, public patient involvement, behavior change, manual, cognitive impairment
format article
author Yates L
Csipke E
Moniz-Cook E
Leung P
Walton H
Charlesworth G
Spector A
Hogervorst E
Mountain G
Orrell M
author_facet Yates L
Csipke E
Moniz-Cook E
Leung P
Walton H
Charlesworth G
Spector A
Hogervorst E
Mountain G
Orrell M
author_sort Yates L
title The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia
title_short The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia
title_full The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia
title_fullStr The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia
title_full_unstemmed The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia
title_sort development of the promoting independence in dementia (pride) intervention to enhance independence in dementia
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/e8adb728524c4cb6b43097e052da356d
work_keys_str_mv AT yatesl thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT csipkee thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT monizcooke thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT leungp thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT waltonh thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT charlesworthg thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT spectora thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT hogervorste thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT mountaing thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT orrellm thedevelopmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT yatesl developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT csipkee developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT monizcooke developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT leungp developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT waltonh developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT charlesworthg developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT spectora developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT hogervorste developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT mountaing developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
AT orrellm developmentofthepromotingindependenceindementiaprideinterventiontoenhanceindependenceindementia
_version_ 1718402133739438080