The History of a Genuine Fake Philosophical Treatise (Ḥatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob and Ḥatatā Walda Ḥeywat). Episode 2: The Time of Debunking, The Time in the Wilderness (from 1916 to the 1950s)

This second article in a series devoted to the history of the philosophical treatises attributed to Zar’a Yā‘eqob and his disciple Walda Ḥeywat explores the moment of “debunking”. How did doubts arise about the Hatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob as early as 1916? How did its authorship come to be attributed to Gi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Anaïs Wion
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
Publicado: Institut des Mondes Africains 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e944f54ccdde43d18cf9a2d0e41578d4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e944f54ccdde43d18cf9a2d0e41578d4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e944f54ccdde43d18cf9a2d0e41578d42021-12-02T09:54:58ZThe History of a Genuine Fake Philosophical Treatise (Ḥatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob and Ḥatatā Walda Ḥeywat). Episode 2: The Time of Debunking, The Time in the Wilderness (from 1916 to the 1950s)2108-679610.4000/afriques.3188https://doaj.org/article/e944f54ccdde43d18cf9a2d0e41578d42021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/afriques/3188https://doaj.org/toc/2108-6796This second article in a series devoted to the history of the philosophical treatises attributed to Zar’a Yā‘eqob and his disciple Walda Ḥeywat explores the moment of “debunking”. How did doubts arise about the Hatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob as early as 1916? How did its authorship come to be attributed to Giusto d’Urbino in 1920? After all, the article by the great philologist and historian C. Conti Rossini that turned this “rare jewel of Ethiopian literature” into a literary forgery is very succinct, and is more of a collection of pieces of evidence than an irrefutable proof. A few years later, another philologist, E. Mittwoch, tried to prove a Giusto d’Urbino authorship; however, his linguistic and philological analysis was flawed due to its reliance on an indirect source. Nonetheless, the academic community accepted these two scholars’ authoritative arguments. The present article follows up on this scholarly investigation in an effort to corroborate and enrich it, but also to show its shortcomings. Above all, it provides a new interpretation of the texts based on genetic criticism, and as such, tries to envisage the author, Giusto d’Urbino, at work on the Hatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob. It also once again draws on Giusto d’Urbino’s unpublished correspondence with Antoine d’Abbadie with a view to better understanding the freethinker’s thought and motivations.Anaïs WionInstitut des Mondes Africainsarticlemystificationphilosophydeismautobiographygenetic criticismOrientalismHistory of AfricaDT1-3415DEENFRAfriques (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
topic mystification
philosophy
deism
autobiography
genetic criticism
Orientalism
History of Africa
DT1-3415
spellingShingle mystification
philosophy
deism
autobiography
genetic criticism
Orientalism
History of Africa
DT1-3415
Anaïs Wion
The History of a Genuine Fake Philosophical Treatise (Ḥatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob and Ḥatatā Walda Ḥeywat). Episode 2: The Time of Debunking, The Time in the Wilderness (from 1916 to the 1950s)
description This second article in a series devoted to the history of the philosophical treatises attributed to Zar’a Yā‘eqob and his disciple Walda Ḥeywat explores the moment of “debunking”. How did doubts arise about the Hatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob as early as 1916? How did its authorship come to be attributed to Giusto d’Urbino in 1920? After all, the article by the great philologist and historian C. Conti Rossini that turned this “rare jewel of Ethiopian literature” into a literary forgery is very succinct, and is more of a collection of pieces of evidence than an irrefutable proof. A few years later, another philologist, E. Mittwoch, tried to prove a Giusto d’Urbino authorship; however, his linguistic and philological analysis was flawed due to its reliance on an indirect source. Nonetheless, the academic community accepted these two scholars’ authoritative arguments. The present article follows up on this scholarly investigation in an effort to corroborate and enrich it, but also to show its shortcomings. Above all, it provides a new interpretation of the texts based on genetic criticism, and as such, tries to envisage the author, Giusto d’Urbino, at work on the Hatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob. It also once again draws on Giusto d’Urbino’s unpublished correspondence with Antoine d’Abbadie with a view to better understanding the freethinker’s thought and motivations.
format article
author Anaïs Wion
author_facet Anaïs Wion
author_sort Anaïs Wion
title The History of a Genuine Fake Philosophical Treatise (Ḥatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob and Ḥatatā Walda Ḥeywat). Episode 2: The Time of Debunking, The Time in the Wilderness (from 1916 to the 1950s)
title_short The History of a Genuine Fake Philosophical Treatise (Ḥatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob and Ḥatatā Walda Ḥeywat). Episode 2: The Time of Debunking, The Time in the Wilderness (from 1916 to the 1950s)
title_full The History of a Genuine Fake Philosophical Treatise (Ḥatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob and Ḥatatā Walda Ḥeywat). Episode 2: The Time of Debunking, The Time in the Wilderness (from 1916 to the 1950s)
title_fullStr The History of a Genuine Fake Philosophical Treatise (Ḥatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob and Ḥatatā Walda Ḥeywat). Episode 2: The Time of Debunking, The Time in the Wilderness (from 1916 to the 1950s)
title_full_unstemmed The History of a Genuine Fake Philosophical Treatise (Ḥatatā Zar’a Yā‘eqob and Ḥatatā Walda Ḥeywat). Episode 2: The Time of Debunking, The Time in the Wilderness (from 1916 to the 1950s)
title_sort history of a genuine fake philosophical treatise (ḥatatā zar’a yā‘eqob and ḥatatā walda ḥeywat). episode 2: the time of debunking, the time in the wilderness (from 1916 to the 1950s)
publisher Institut des Mondes Africains
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e944f54ccdde43d18cf9a2d0e41578d4
work_keys_str_mv AT anaiswion thehistoryofagenuinefakephilosophicaltreatisehatatazarayaeqobandhatatawaldaheywatepisode2thetimeofdebunkingthetimeinthewildernessfrom1916tothe1950s
AT anaiswion historyofagenuinefakephilosophicaltreatisehatatazarayaeqobandhatatawaldaheywatepisode2thetimeofdebunkingthetimeinthewildernessfrom1916tothe1950s
_version_ 1718397917381787648