A mixed methods approach to exploring values that inform desirable food-systems futures

Throughout the United States, urban food systems are in suboptimal states that are not operating efficiently or equitably and thus do not support food security for all. Creating transformation to a more sustainable and desirable state first requires acknowledging the different values of diverse grou...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rachael Belisle-Toler, Jennifer Hodbod, Chelsea Wentworth
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e95a427e33634a50a5b451ef78c2dd71
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e95a427e33634a50a5b451ef78c2dd71
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e95a427e33634a50a5b451ef78c2dd712021-11-26T11:19:47ZA mixed methods approach to exploring values that inform desirable food-systems futures1548-773310.1080/15487733.2021.1996768https://doaj.org/article/e95a427e33634a50a5b451ef78c2dd712021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1996768https://doaj.org/toc/1548-7733Throughout the United States, urban food systems are in suboptimal states that are not operating efficiently or equitably and thus do not support food security for all. Creating transformation to a more sustainable and desirable state first requires acknowledging the different values of diverse groups within a city. Then these diverse values can be used to explore pluralistic pathways to futures that maximize benefits for multiple stakeholders. We demonstrate how integrating visioning and Q-methodology can achieve an inclusive understanding of values as priorities for such a food system. Applied in Flint, Michigan, a post-industrial Rust Belt city, this approach can shape the planning process for cities experiencing food insecurity. Qualitative analysis of data from a visioning workshop resulted in sixteen values as priorities for a sustainable and desirable food system. Values as priorities were then ranked in a Q-sort activity, from which three unique groups of ranking patterns emerged, each of which can be interpreted as a vision for a better future. The three visions were a food system with healthy foods that residents are willing to travel for; a food system with convenient, fresh food options for those who cannot travel; and a food system that maintains the community’s food traditions. Our novel mixed methods approach empowers communities by giving them a voice in the planning process but also allows decision makers to create transformation pathways that more accurately reflect the needs of the various subsets of community members who hold diverse visions and priorities.Rachael Belisle-TolerJennifer HodbodChelsea WentworthTaylor & Francis Grouparticleurban food systemsvalues as prioritiesfood valuesvisioningq-methodologySocial sciences (General)H1-99ENSustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 362-376 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic urban food systems
values as priorities
food values
visioning
q-methodology
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle urban food systems
values as priorities
food values
visioning
q-methodology
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Rachael Belisle-Toler
Jennifer Hodbod
Chelsea Wentworth
A mixed methods approach to exploring values that inform desirable food-systems futures
description Throughout the United States, urban food systems are in suboptimal states that are not operating efficiently or equitably and thus do not support food security for all. Creating transformation to a more sustainable and desirable state first requires acknowledging the different values of diverse groups within a city. Then these diverse values can be used to explore pluralistic pathways to futures that maximize benefits for multiple stakeholders. We demonstrate how integrating visioning and Q-methodology can achieve an inclusive understanding of values as priorities for such a food system. Applied in Flint, Michigan, a post-industrial Rust Belt city, this approach can shape the planning process for cities experiencing food insecurity. Qualitative analysis of data from a visioning workshop resulted in sixteen values as priorities for a sustainable and desirable food system. Values as priorities were then ranked in a Q-sort activity, from which three unique groups of ranking patterns emerged, each of which can be interpreted as a vision for a better future. The three visions were a food system with healthy foods that residents are willing to travel for; a food system with convenient, fresh food options for those who cannot travel; and a food system that maintains the community’s food traditions. Our novel mixed methods approach empowers communities by giving them a voice in the planning process but also allows decision makers to create transformation pathways that more accurately reflect the needs of the various subsets of community members who hold diverse visions and priorities.
format article
author Rachael Belisle-Toler
Jennifer Hodbod
Chelsea Wentworth
author_facet Rachael Belisle-Toler
Jennifer Hodbod
Chelsea Wentworth
author_sort Rachael Belisle-Toler
title A mixed methods approach to exploring values that inform desirable food-systems futures
title_short A mixed methods approach to exploring values that inform desirable food-systems futures
title_full A mixed methods approach to exploring values that inform desirable food-systems futures
title_fullStr A mixed methods approach to exploring values that inform desirable food-systems futures
title_full_unstemmed A mixed methods approach to exploring values that inform desirable food-systems futures
title_sort mixed methods approach to exploring values that inform desirable food-systems futures
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e95a427e33634a50a5b451ef78c2dd71
work_keys_str_mv AT rachaelbelisletoler amixedmethodsapproachtoexploringvaluesthatinformdesirablefoodsystemsfutures
AT jenniferhodbod amixedmethodsapproachtoexploringvaluesthatinformdesirablefoodsystemsfutures
AT chelseawentworth amixedmethodsapproachtoexploringvaluesthatinformdesirablefoodsystemsfutures
AT rachaelbelisletoler mixedmethodsapproachtoexploringvaluesthatinformdesirablefoodsystemsfutures
AT jenniferhodbod mixedmethodsapproachtoexploringvaluesthatinformdesirablefoodsystemsfutures
AT chelseawentworth mixedmethodsapproachtoexploringvaluesthatinformdesirablefoodsystemsfutures
_version_ 1718409568593117184