36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Depending on the stage of the disease and the child’s age, different types of interventions can be used to treat early childhood caries. As a result, there is not enough clinical evidence to show that one kind of restoration is better than another. The objective of this longitudinal stud...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Maria Sarapultseva, Alexey Sarapultsev
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	caries risk composite layering technique early childhood caries pediatric dentistry restorations primary teeth caries strip crowns Dentistry RK1-715
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e975df7ea60348e291bea576560e190e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e975df7ea60348e291bea576560e190e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e975df7ea60348e291bea576560e190e2021-11-25T17:19:56Z36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial10.3390/dj91101262304-6767https://doaj.org/article/e975df7ea60348e291bea576560e190e2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/9/11/126https://doaj.org/toc/2304-6767Background: Depending on the stage of the disease and the child’s age, different types of interventions can be used to treat early childhood caries. As a result, there is not enough clinical evidence to show that one kind of restoration is better than another. The objective of this longitudinal study was to compare the results of 36 months of clinical performance of primary incisors restorations using an incremental layering technique with the ceram.x<sup>®</sup> SphereTECTM nanoceramic composite (Dentsply) or a full coverage technique with transparent strip crowns (Frasaco GmbH) with the same composite in children with or without biological caries risk factors. Methods: 80 patients (females 42/52.5%) were included in the study. A total of 160 restorations were performed. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, according to modified Ryge criteria. Conclusion: Restorations with both techniques were clinically highly successful and showed similar clinical performance at postoperatively regardless of the presence of biological factors of caries risk.Maria SarapultsevaAlexey SarapultsevMDPI AGarticlecaries riskcomposite layering techniqueearly childhood cariespediatric dentistry restorationsprimary teeth cariesstrip crownsDentistryRK1-715ENDentistry Journal, Vol 9, Iss 126, p 126 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	caries risk composite layering technique early childhood caries pediatric dentistry restorations primary teeth caries strip crowns Dentistry RK1-715
spellingShingle	caries risk composite layering technique early childhood caries pediatric dentistry restorations primary teeth caries strip crowns Dentistry RK1-715 Maria Sarapultseva Alexey Sarapultsev 36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial
description	Background: Depending on the stage of the disease and the child’s age, different types of interventions can be used to treat early childhood caries. As a result, there is not enough clinical evidence to show that one kind of restoration is better than another. The objective of this longitudinal study was to compare the results of 36 months of clinical performance of primary incisors restorations using an incremental layering technique with the ceram.x<sup>®</sup> SphereTECTM nanoceramic composite (Dentsply) or a full coverage technique with transparent strip crowns (Frasaco GmbH) with the same composite in children with or without biological caries risk factors. Methods: 80 patients (females 42/52.5%) were included in the study. A total of 160 restorations were performed. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, according to modified Ryge criteria. Conclusion: Restorations with both techniques were clinically highly successful and showed similar clinical performance at postoperatively regardless of the presence of biological factors of caries risk.
format	article
author	Maria Sarapultseva Alexey Sarapultsev
author_facet	Maria Sarapultseva Alexey Sarapultsev
author_sort	Maria Sarapultseva
title	36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short	36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full	36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr	36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed	36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort	36 months’ clinical performance of primary incisors restorations depending on the type of restorative technique used: a randomized controlled trial
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/e975df7ea60348e291bea576560e190e
work_keys_str_mv	AT mariasarapultseva 36monthsclinicalperformanceofprimaryincisorsrestorationsdependingonthetypeofrestorativetechniqueusedarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT alexeysarapultsev 36monthsclinicalperformanceofprimaryincisorsrestorationsdependingonthetypeofrestorativetechniqueusedarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_	1718412503199776768

36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ejemplares similares