Exposure–response analysis of efficacy and safety for pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor

Abstract This analysis was conducted to assess exposure–response relationships for efficacy and safety of pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Efficacy was assessed categorically by overall response rate (ORR) with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ophelia Yin, Hamim Zahir, Jonathan French, Daniel Polhamus, Xiaoning Wang, Michiel van deSande, William D. Tap, Hans Gelderblom, Andrew J. Wagner, John H. Healey, Jonathan Greenberg, Dale Shuster, Silvia Stacchiotti
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e98d8752c9444f7c9cdac6701994c7d3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e98d8752c9444f7c9cdac6701994c7d3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e98d8752c9444f7c9cdac6701994c7d32021-11-15T18:41:54ZExposure–response analysis of efficacy and safety for pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor2163-830610.1002/psp4.12712https://doaj.org/article/e98d8752c9444f7c9cdac6701994c7d32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12712https://doaj.org/toc/2163-8306Abstract This analysis was conducted to assess exposure–response relationships for efficacy and safety of pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Efficacy was assessed categorically by overall response rate (ORR) with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and longitudinally (changes in tumor size and volume). Safety included hepatic parameters (i.e., alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], and total bilirubin). Average pexidartinib concentration (Cavg) was identified as the primary exposure parameter correlated with response. In categorical and longitudinal analyses, higher Cavg coincided with greater ORR and tumor size reduction, respectively, with smaller joint size having a greater impact. For safety, a significant relationship was observed between Cavg and incidence of ALT‐related and AST‐related adverse events (AEs). With increased exposure, an increase in efficacy was predicted with near maximum effect at 800 mg/day. Higher initial dose (1000 mg/day) during the first 2 weeks did not improve efficacy. Higher doses were associated with an increased risk of ALT‐related and AST‐related AEs. These results support the US Food and Drug Administration–approved dose (400 mg two times/day without initial loading dose).Ophelia YinHamim ZahirJonathan FrenchDaniel PolhamusXiaoning WangMichiel van deSandeWilliam D. TapHans GelderblomAndrew J. WagnerJohn H. HealeyJonathan GreenbergDale ShusterSilvia StacchiottiWileyarticleTherapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950ENCPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Vol 10, Iss 11, Pp 1422-1432 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
spellingShingle Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
Ophelia Yin
Hamim Zahir
Jonathan French
Daniel Polhamus
Xiaoning Wang
Michiel van deSande
William D. Tap
Hans Gelderblom
Andrew J. Wagner
John H. Healey
Jonathan Greenberg
Dale Shuster
Silvia Stacchiotti
Exposure–response analysis of efficacy and safety for pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor
description Abstract This analysis was conducted to assess exposure–response relationships for efficacy and safety of pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Efficacy was assessed categorically by overall response rate (ORR) with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and longitudinally (changes in tumor size and volume). Safety included hepatic parameters (i.e., alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], and total bilirubin). Average pexidartinib concentration (Cavg) was identified as the primary exposure parameter correlated with response. In categorical and longitudinal analyses, higher Cavg coincided with greater ORR and tumor size reduction, respectively, with smaller joint size having a greater impact. For safety, a significant relationship was observed between Cavg and incidence of ALT‐related and AST‐related adverse events (AEs). With increased exposure, an increase in efficacy was predicted with near maximum effect at 800 mg/day. Higher initial dose (1000 mg/day) during the first 2 weeks did not improve efficacy. Higher doses were associated with an increased risk of ALT‐related and AST‐related AEs. These results support the US Food and Drug Administration–approved dose (400 mg two times/day without initial loading dose).
format article
author Ophelia Yin
Hamim Zahir
Jonathan French
Daniel Polhamus
Xiaoning Wang
Michiel van deSande
William D. Tap
Hans Gelderblom
Andrew J. Wagner
John H. Healey
Jonathan Greenberg
Dale Shuster
Silvia Stacchiotti
author_facet Ophelia Yin
Hamim Zahir
Jonathan French
Daniel Polhamus
Xiaoning Wang
Michiel van deSande
William D. Tap
Hans Gelderblom
Andrew J. Wagner
John H. Healey
Jonathan Greenberg
Dale Shuster
Silvia Stacchiotti
author_sort Ophelia Yin
title Exposure–response analysis of efficacy and safety for pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor
title_short Exposure–response analysis of efficacy and safety for pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor
title_full Exposure–response analysis of efficacy and safety for pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor
title_fullStr Exposure–response analysis of efficacy and safety for pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor
title_full_unstemmed Exposure–response analysis of efficacy and safety for pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor
title_sort exposure–response analysis of efficacy and safety for pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e98d8752c9444f7c9cdac6701994c7d3
work_keys_str_mv AT opheliayin exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT hamimzahir exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT jonathanfrench exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT danielpolhamus exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT xiaoningwang exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT michielvandesande exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT williamdtap exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT hansgelderblom exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT andrewjwagner exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT johnhhealey exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT jonathangreenberg exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT daleshuster exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
AT silviastacchiotti exposureresponseanalysisofefficacyandsafetyforpexidartinibinpatientswithtenosynovialgiantcelltumor
_version_ 1718426878847483904