Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles.

<h4>Background</h4>Even after the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) found that the risks of menopausal hormone therapy (hormone therapy) outweighed benefit for asymptomatic women, about half of gynecologists in the United States continued to believe that hormones benefited women'...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Adriane Fugh-Berman, Christina Pike McDonald, Alicia M Bell, Emily Catherine Bethards, Anthony R Scialli
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:	Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e9bb43dea7bd41aa94c0eae4e68b09ad
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e9bb43dea7bd41aa94c0eae4e68b09ad
record_format	dspace
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R
spellingShingle	Medicine R Adriane Fugh-Berman Christina Pike McDonald Alicia M Bell Emily Catherine Bethards Anthony R Scialli Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles.
description	<h4>Background</h4>Even after the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) found that the risks of menopausal hormone therapy (hormone therapy) outweighed benefit for asymptomatic women, about half of gynecologists in the United States continued to believe that hormones benefited women's health. The pharmaceutical industry has supported publication of articles in medical journals for marketing purposes. It is unknown whether author relationships with industry affect promotional tone in articles on hormone therapy. The goal of this study was to determine whether promotional tone could be identified in narrative review articles regarding menopausal hormone therapy and whether articles identified as promotional were more likely to have been authored by those with conflicts of interest with manufacturers of menopausal hormone therapy.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We analyzed tone in opinion pieces on hormone therapy published in the four years after the estrogen-progestin arm of the WHI was stopped. First, we identified the ten authors with four or more MEDLINE-indexed reviews, editorials, comments, or letters on hormone replacement therapy or menopausal hormone therapy published between July 2002 and June 2006. Next, we conducted an additional search using the names of these authors to identify other relevant articles. Finally, after author names and affiliations were removed, 50 articles were evaluated by three readers for scientific accuracy and for tone. Scientific accuracy was assessed based on whether or not the findings of the WHI were accurately reported using two criteria: (1) Acknowledgment or lack of denial of the risk of breast cancer diagnosis associated with hormone therapy, and (2) acknowledgment that hormone therapy did not benefit cardiovascular disease endpoints. Determination of promotional tone was based on the assessment by each reader of whether the article appeared to promote hormone therapy. Analysis of inter-rater consistency found moderate agreement for scientific accuracy (κ=0.57) and substantial agreement for promotional tone (κ=0.65). After discussion, readers found 86% of the articles to be scientifically accurate and 64% to be promotional in tone. Themes that were common in articles considered promotional included attacks on the methodology of the WHI, arguments that clinical trial results should not guide treatment for individuals, and arguments that observational studies are as good as or better than randomized clinical trials for guiding clinical decisions. The promotional articles we identified also implied that the risks associated with hormone therapy have been exaggerated and that the benefits of hormone therapy have been or will be proven. Of the ten authors studied, eight were found to have declared payment for speaking or consulting on behalf of menopausal hormone manufacturers or for research support (seven of these eight were speakers or consultants). Thirty of 32 articles (90%) evaluated as promoting hormone therapy were authored by those with potential financial conflicts of interest, compared to 11 of 18 articles (61%) by those without such conflicts (p=0.0025). Articles promoting the use of menopausal hormone therapy were 2.41 times (95% confidence interval 1.49-4.93) as likely to have been authored by authors with conflicts of interest as by authors without conflicts of interest. In articles from three authors with conflicts of interest some of the same text was repeated word-for-word in different articles.<h4>Conclusion</h4>There may be a connection between receiving industry funding for speaking, consulting, or research and the publication of promotional opinion pieces on menopausal hormone therapy.
format	article
author	Adriane Fugh-Berman Christina Pike McDonald Alicia M Bell Emily Catherine Bethards Anthony R Scialli
author_facet	Adriane Fugh-Berman Christina Pike McDonald Alicia M Bell Emily Catherine Bethards Anthony R Scialli
author_sort	Adriane Fugh-Berman
title	Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles.
title_short	Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles.
title_full	Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles.
title_fullStr	Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles.
title_full_unstemmed	Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles.
title_sort	promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the women's health initiative: an analysis of published articles.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2011
url	https://doaj.org/article/e9bb43dea7bd41aa94c0eae4e68b09ad
work_keys_str_mv	AT adrianefughberman promotionaltoneinreviewsofmenopausalhormonetherapyafterthewomenshealthinitiativeananalysisofpublishedarticles AT christinapikemcdonald promotionaltoneinreviewsofmenopausalhormonetherapyafterthewomenshealthinitiativeananalysisofpublishedarticles AT aliciambell promotionaltoneinreviewsofmenopausalhormonetherapyafterthewomenshealthinitiativeananalysisofpublishedarticles AT emilycatherinebethards promotionaltoneinreviewsofmenopausalhormonetherapyafterthewomenshealthinitiativeananalysisofpublishedarticles AT anthonyrscialli promotionaltoneinreviewsofmenopausalhormonetherapyafterthewomenshealthinitiativeananalysisofpublishedarticles
_version_	1718424887102537728
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e9bb43dea7bd41aa94c0eae4e68b09ad2021-11-18T05:41:53ZPromotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles.1549-12771549-167610.1371/journal.pmed.1000425https://doaj.org/article/e9bb43dea7bd41aa94c0eae4e68b09ad2011-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21423581/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676<h4>Background</h4>Even after the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) found that the risks of menopausal hormone therapy (hormone therapy) outweighed benefit for asymptomatic women, about half of gynecologists in the United States continued to believe that hormones benefited women's health. The pharmaceutical industry has supported publication of articles in medical journals for marketing purposes. It is unknown whether author relationships with industry affect promotional tone in articles on hormone therapy. The goal of this study was to determine whether promotional tone could be identified in narrative review articles regarding menopausal hormone therapy and whether articles identified as promotional were more likely to have been authored by those with conflicts of interest with manufacturers of menopausal hormone therapy.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We analyzed tone in opinion pieces on hormone therapy published in the four years after the estrogen-progestin arm of the WHI was stopped. First, we identified the ten authors with four or more MEDLINE-indexed reviews, editorials, comments, or letters on hormone replacement therapy or menopausal hormone therapy published between July 2002 and June 2006. Next, we conducted an additional search using the names of these authors to identify other relevant articles. Finally, after author names and affiliations were removed, 50 articles were evaluated by three readers for scientific accuracy and for tone. Scientific accuracy was assessed based on whether or not the findings of the WHI were accurately reported using two criteria: (1) Acknowledgment or lack of denial of the risk of breast cancer diagnosis associated with hormone therapy, and (2) acknowledgment that hormone therapy did not benefit cardiovascular disease endpoints. Determination of promotional tone was based on the assessment by each reader of whether the article appeared to promote hormone therapy. Analysis of inter-rater consistency found moderate agreement for scientific accuracy (κ=0.57) and substantial agreement for promotional tone (κ=0.65). After discussion, readers found 86% of the articles to be scientifically accurate and 64% to be promotional in tone. Themes that were common in articles considered promotional included attacks on the methodology of the WHI, arguments that clinical trial results should not guide treatment for individuals, and arguments that observational studies are as good as or better than randomized clinical trials for guiding clinical decisions. The promotional articles we identified also implied that the risks associated with hormone therapy have been exaggerated and that the benefits of hormone therapy have been or will be proven. Of the ten authors studied, eight were found to have declared payment for speaking or consulting on behalf of menopausal hormone manufacturers or for research support (seven of these eight were speakers or consultants). Thirty of 32 articles (90%) evaluated as promoting hormone therapy were authored by those with potential financial conflicts of interest, compared to 11 of 18 articles (61%) by those without such conflicts (p=0.0025). Articles promoting the use of menopausal hormone therapy were 2.41 times (95% confidence interval 1.49-4.93) as likely to have been authored by authors with conflicts of interest as by authors without conflicts of interest. In articles from three authors with conflicts of interest some of the same text was repeated word-for-word in different articles.<h4>Conclusion</h4>There may be a connection between receiving industry funding for speaking, consulting, or research and the publication of promotional opinion pieces on menopausal hormone therapy.Adriane Fugh-BermanChristina Pike McDonaldAlicia M BellEmily Catherine BethardsAnthony R ScialliPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRENPLoS Medicine, Vol 8, Iss 3, p e1000425 (2011)

Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles.

Ejemplares similares