Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors

Abstract We aimed to analyze the relationship of the distribution of body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in the limbs and trunk with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVD-RF). In total, 13,032 adults were selected from the KNHANES (2008–2011). The prevalence of hypertensi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sunmi Jung, Jihyun Park, Young-Gyun Seo
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e9d2b667d18345568001085da57e88c1
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e9d2b667d18345568001085da57e88c1
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e9d2b667d18345568001085da57e88c12021-12-02T15:25:34ZRelationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors10.1038/s41598-021-96874-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/e9d2b667d18345568001085da57e88c12021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96874-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We aimed to analyze the relationship of the distribution of body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in the limbs and trunk with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVD-RF). In total, 13,032 adults were selected from the KNHANES (2008–2011). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) according to the arm-to-leg ratio and limbs-to-trunk ratio for FM and FFM was compared, respectively. The higher the arm-to-leg FM ratio, the higher the prevalence of CVD-RF (DM-male-OR 7.04, 95% CI 4.22–11.74; DM-female-OR 10.57, 95% CI 5.80–19.26; MetS-male-OR 4.47, 95% CI 3.41- 5.86; MetS-female-OR 8.73, 95% CI 6.38–11.95). The higher the limbs-to-trunk FM ratio (DM-male-OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.07–0.21; DM-female-OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06–0.23; MetS-male-OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.04–0.08; MetS-female-OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01–0.04), the higher the limbs-to-trunk FFM ratio (DM-male-OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.11–0.31; DM-female-OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30–0.70; MetS-male-OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31–0.50; MetS-female-OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.78), and the higher the arm-to-leg FFM ratio (MetS-male-OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59–0.94; MetS-female-OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.92), the lower the prevalence of CVD-RF. The higher the FM of the legs compared to the arms, FFM of the arms compared to the legs, and FM or FFM of the limbs compared to the trunk, the lower the prevalence of CVD-RF.Sunmi JungJihyun ParkYoung-Gyun SeoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Sunmi Jung Jihyun Park Young-Gyun Seo Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
description	Abstract We aimed to analyze the relationship of the distribution of body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in the limbs and trunk with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVD-RF). In total, 13,032 adults were selected from the KNHANES (2008–2011). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) according to the arm-to-leg ratio and limbs-to-trunk ratio for FM and FFM was compared, respectively. The higher the arm-to-leg FM ratio, the higher the prevalence of CVD-RF (DM-male-OR 7.04, 95% CI 4.22–11.74; DM-female-OR 10.57, 95% CI 5.80–19.26; MetS-male-OR 4.47, 95% CI 3.41- 5.86; MetS-female-OR 8.73, 95% CI 6.38–11.95). The higher the limbs-to-trunk FM ratio (DM-male-OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.07–0.21; DM-female-OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06–0.23; MetS-male-OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.04–0.08; MetS-female-OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01–0.04), the higher the limbs-to-trunk FFM ratio (DM-male-OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.11–0.31; DM-female-OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30–0.70; MetS-male-OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31–0.50; MetS-female-OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.78), and the higher the arm-to-leg FFM ratio (MetS-male-OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59–0.94; MetS-female-OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.92), the lower the prevalence of CVD-RF. The higher the FM of the legs compared to the arms, FFM of the arms compared to the legs, and FM or FFM of the limbs compared to the trunk, the lower the prevalence of CVD-RF.
format	article
author	Sunmi Jung Jihyun Park Young-Gyun Seo
author_facet	Sunmi Jung Jihyun Park Young-Gyun Seo
author_sort	Sunmi Jung
title	Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
title_short	Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
title_full	Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
title_fullStr	Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
title_full_unstemmed	Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
title_sort	relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/e9d2b667d18345568001085da57e88c1
work_keys_str_mv	AT sunmijung relationshipbetweenarmtolegandlimbstotrunkbodycompositionratioandcardiovasculardiseaseriskfactors AT jihyunpark relationshipbetweenarmtolegandlimbstotrunkbodycompositionratioandcardiovasculardiseaseriskfactors AT younggyunseo relationshipbetweenarmtolegandlimbstotrunkbodycompositionratioandcardiovasculardiseaseriskfactors
_version_	1718387299846193152

Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors

Ejemplares similares