The Elephant in the Room: NAMUDNO, Shelby County, and Racially Polarized Voting
A key provision of the Voting Rights Act was rendered ineffective by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 decision in 2013. The provision, focused primarily on governments in the South, required them to gain federal “preclearance” for changes in their election arrangements before they could be impleme...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | Richard L. Engstrom |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR |
Publicado: |
Association Française d'Etudes Américaines
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ea20bc29f13e4d31a82e940e8a743c28 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The Voting Rights Act After Shelby County v. Holder: A Potential Fix to Revive Section 5
por: Thomas L. Brunell, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Paul Carmignani. Shelby Foote. Un sudiste au carré.
por: Michel Bandry
Publicado: (2006) -
Restricting Voting Rights in Modern America
por: Desmond King, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Débat étatsunien sur les statistiques ethno-raciales : l’exemple de la Proposition 54 en Californie
por: Olivier Richomme
Publicado: (2011) -
« Ouest(s) en éclats », compte-rendu de l’exposition Road Trip, Photographies XIXe-XXIe siècles du Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Musée des Beaux-Arts de Bordeaux, 28 août-10 novembre 2014
por: Mathilde Arrivé
Publicado: (2016)