Sizing and operation of energy storage by Power-to-Gas and Underwater Compressed Air systems applied to offshore wind power generation
Among the possible solutions for large-scale renewable energy storage, Power-to-Gas (P2G) and Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) appear very promising. In this work, P2G and an innovative type of CAES based on underwater storage volumes (UW-CAES) are compared from a techno-economic point of view,...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN FR |
| Publicado: |
EDP Sciences
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ea258136c9f34cbfa393f8a599ecc81f |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Among the possible solutions for large-scale renewable energy storage, Power-to-Gas (P2G) and Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) appear very promising. In this work, P2G and an innovative type of CAES based on underwater storage volumes (UW-CAES) are compared from a techno-economic point of view, when applied in combination with a 48 MWe offshore wind power plant, selecting an appropriate location for both high productivity and favorable seabed depth. An optimization model is employed to study the system design and operation, maximizing the lifetime plant profitability, while considering differential installation and operation costs, market values of the products (i.e., hydrogen and electricity), and technological constraints. In the current economic and technological scenario, the resulting P2G system has a nominal power equivalent to about 10% of the wind park capacity, with a small hydrogen storage buffer. On the other hand, the compressor and the turbine of the UWCAES have a nominal power close to the full wind farm capacity, and large underwater compressed air tanks are required. Both options significantly impact the wind plant management but the most beneficial applications of the two systems are different: the P2G results in a compact and flexible unit, whereas the UW-CAES is able to exploit a higher average conversion efficiency (about 80% round-trip) against a much higher installed power and investment cost. Anyway, considering the current framework, the resulting economics are still inadequate, but their competitiveness can improve compatible with the expected evolution of energy markets in the next future. |
|---|