Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.

<h4>Background</h4>The interplay between the workflow for clinical tasks and research data collection is often overlooked, ultimately making it ineffective.<h4>Questions/purposes</h4>To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have developed standards that allow for the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Luciana Cofiel, Débora U Bassi, Ryan Kumar Ray, Ricardo Pietrobon, Helena Brentani
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ea6956725df045d0bf9a029118d15eab
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ea6956725df045d0bf9a029118d15eab
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ea6956725df045d0bf9a029118d15eab2021-11-18T08:54:22ZDetecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0075167https://doaj.org/article/ea6956725df045d0bf9a029118d15eab2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24073246/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>The interplay between the workflow for clinical tasks and research data collection is often overlooked, ultimately making it ineffective.<h4>Questions/purposes</h4>To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have developed standards that allow for the comparison of workflow models derived from clinical and research tasks toward the improvement of data collection processes.<h4>Methods</h4>In this study we used the term dissonance for the occurrences where there was a discord between clinical and research workflows. We developed workflow models for a translational research study in psychiatry and the clinic where its data collection was carried out. After identifying points of dissonance between clinical and research models we derived a corresponding classification system that ultimately enabled us to re-engineer the data collection workflow. We considered (1) the number of patients approached for enrollment and (2) the number of patients enrolled in the study as indicators of efficiency in research workflow. We also recorded the number of dissonances before and after the workflow modification.<h4>Results</h4>We identified 22 episodes of dissonance across 6 dissonance categories: actor, communication, information, artifact, time, and space. We were able to eliminate 18 episodes of dissonance and increase the number of patients approached and enrolled in research study trough workflow modification.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The classification developed in this study is useful for guiding the identification of dissonances and reveal modifications required to align the workflow of data collection and the clinical setting. The methodology described in this study can be used by researchers to standardize data collection process.Luciana CofielDébora U BassiRyan Kumar RayRicardo PietrobonHelena BrentaniPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 9, p e75167 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Luciana Cofiel Débora U Bassi Ryan Kumar Ray Ricardo Pietrobon Helena Brentani Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.
description	<h4>Background</h4>The interplay between the workflow for clinical tasks and research data collection is often overlooked, ultimately making it ineffective.<h4>Questions/purposes</h4>To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have developed standards that allow for the comparison of workflow models derived from clinical and research tasks toward the improvement of data collection processes.<h4>Methods</h4>In this study we used the term dissonance for the occurrences where there was a discord between clinical and research workflows. We developed workflow models for a translational research study in psychiatry and the clinic where its data collection was carried out. After identifying points of dissonance between clinical and research models we derived a corresponding classification system that ultimately enabled us to re-engineer the data collection workflow. We considered (1) the number of patients approached for enrollment and (2) the number of patients enrolled in the study as indicators of efficiency in research workflow. We also recorded the number of dissonances before and after the workflow modification.<h4>Results</h4>We identified 22 episodes of dissonance across 6 dissonance categories: actor, communication, information, artifact, time, and space. We were able to eliminate 18 episodes of dissonance and increase the number of patients approached and enrolled in research study trough workflow modification.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The classification developed in this study is useful for guiding the identification of dissonances and reveal modifications required to align the workflow of data collection and the clinical setting. The methodology described in this study can be used by researchers to standardize data collection process.
format	article
author	Luciana Cofiel Débora U Bassi Ryan Kumar Ray Ricardo Pietrobon Helena Brentani
author_facet	Luciana Cofiel Débora U Bassi Ryan Kumar Ray Ricardo Pietrobon Helena Brentani
author_sort	Luciana Cofiel
title	Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.
title_short	Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.
title_full	Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.
title_fullStr	Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.
title_full_unstemmed	Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.
title_sort	detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/ea6956725df045d0bf9a029118d15eab
work_keys_str_mv	AT lucianacofiel detectingdissonanceinclinicalandresearchworkflowfortranslationalpsychiatricregistries AT deboraubassi detectingdissonanceinclinicalandresearchworkflowfortranslationalpsychiatricregistries AT ryankumarray detectingdissonanceinclinicalandresearchworkflowfortranslationalpsychiatricregistries AT ricardopietrobon detectingdissonanceinclinicalandresearchworkflowfortranslationalpsychiatricregistries AT helenabrentani detectingdissonanceinclinicalandresearchworkflowfortranslationalpsychiatricregistries
_version_	1718421236172718080

Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.

Ejemplares similares