Assessment of Motor Planning and Inhibition Performance in Non-Clinical Sample—Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks

In two studies, we examine the test-retest reliability and factor structure of the computerized Tower of London (TOL) and Go/No Go (GNG). Before analyses, raw results of variables that were not normally distributed were transformed. Study 1 examined the reliability of a broad spectrum of indicators...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ernest Tyburski, Magdalena Kerestey, Pavlo Kerestey, Stanisław Radoń, Shane T. Mueller
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	motor planning motor inhibition Psychology Experiment Building Language Tower of London Go/No Go task test-retest reliability Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ea9e0cd652c44b2a8f677f41461207f8
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ea9e0cd652c44b2a8f677f41461207f8
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ea9e0cd652c44b2a8f677f41461207f82021-11-25T16:56:49ZAssessment of Motor Planning and Inhibition Performance in Non-Clinical Sample—Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks10.3390/brainsci111114202076-3425https://doaj.org/article/ea9e0cd652c44b2a8f677f41461207f82021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1420https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3425In two studies, we examine the test-retest reliability and factor structure of the computerized Tower of London (TOL) and Go/No Go (GNG). Before analyses, raw results of variables that were not normally distributed were transformed. Study 1 examined the reliability of a broad spectrum of indicators (Initial Time Thinking, ITT; Execution Time, ET; Full Time, FT; Extra Moves, EM; No Go Errors, NGE; Reaction Time for Go Responses, RTGR) across an eight-week delay in a sample of 20 young adults. After correction for multiple comparisons and correlations, our results demonstrate that the tasks have ambiguous test-retest reliability coefficients (non-significant <i>r</i> for all indicators, and interclass correlation (ICC) for TOL; significant ICC for GNG; show lack of reliable change over time for all indicators in both tasks); moreover, ITT exhibits strong practice effects. Study 2 investigated both tasks’ factor structure and conducted a more detailed analysis of indicators for each trial (ITT, ET, EM) in the TOL task in the group of 95 young adults. Results reveal a satisfactory 2-factor solution, with the first factor (planning inhibition) defined by ITT, NGE, and RTGR, and the second factor (move efficiency) defined by EM and ET. The detailed analysis identified a 6-factor solution with the first factor defined by ITT for more difficult trials and the remaining five factors defined by EM and ET for each trial, reflecting move efficiency for each trial separately.Ernest TyburskiMagdalena KeresteyPavlo KeresteyStanisław RadońShane T. MuellerMDPI AGarticlemotor planningmotor inhibitionPsychology Experiment Building LanguageTower of LondonGo/No Go tasktest-retest reliabilityNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENBrain Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 1420, p 1420 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	motor planning motor inhibition Psychology Experiment Building Language Tower of London Go/No Go task test-retest reliability Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571
spellingShingle	motor planning motor inhibition Psychology Experiment Building Language Tower of London Go/No Go task test-retest reliability Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Ernest Tyburski Magdalena Kerestey Pavlo Kerestey Stanisław Radoń Shane T. Mueller Assessment of Motor Planning and Inhibition Performance in Non-Clinical Sample—Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks
description	In two studies, we examine the test-retest reliability and factor structure of the computerized Tower of London (TOL) and Go/No Go (GNG). Before analyses, raw results of variables that were not normally distributed were transformed. Study 1 examined the reliability of a broad spectrum of indicators (Initial Time Thinking, ITT; Execution Time, ET; Full Time, FT; Extra Moves, EM; No Go Errors, NGE; Reaction Time for Go Responses, RTGR) across an eight-week delay in a sample of 20 young adults. After correction for multiple comparisons and correlations, our results demonstrate that the tasks have ambiguous test-retest reliability coefficients (non-significant <i>r</i> for all indicators, and interclass correlation (ICC) for TOL; significant ICC for GNG; show lack of reliable change over time for all indicators in both tasks); moreover, ITT exhibits strong practice effects. Study 2 investigated both tasks’ factor structure and conducted a more detailed analysis of indicators for each trial (ITT, ET, EM) in the TOL task in the group of 95 young adults. Results reveal a satisfactory 2-factor solution, with the first factor (planning inhibition) defined by ITT, NGE, and RTGR, and the second factor (move efficiency) defined by EM and ET. The detailed analysis identified a 6-factor solution with the first factor defined by ITT for more difficult trials and the remaining five factors defined by EM and ET for each trial, reflecting move efficiency for each trial separately.
format	article
author	Ernest Tyburski Magdalena Kerestey Pavlo Kerestey Stanisław Radoń Shane T. Mueller
author_facet	Ernest Tyburski Magdalena Kerestey Pavlo Kerestey Stanisław Radoń Shane T. Mueller
author_sort	Ernest Tyburski
title	Assessment of Motor Planning and Inhibition Performance in Non-Clinical Sample—Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks
title_short	Assessment of Motor Planning and Inhibition Performance in Non-Clinical Sample—Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks
title_full	Assessment of Motor Planning and Inhibition Performance in Non-Clinical Sample—Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks
title_fullStr	Assessment of Motor Planning and Inhibition Performance in Non-Clinical Sample—Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks
title_full_unstemmed	Assessment of Motor Planning and Inhibition Performance in Non-Clinical Sample—Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks
title_sort	assessment of motor planning and inhibition performance in non-clinical sample—reliability and factor structure of the tower of london and go/no go computerized tasks
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/ea9e0cd652c44b2a8f677f41461207f8
work_keys_str_mv	AT ernesttyburski assessmentofmotorplanningandinhibitionperformanceinnonclinicalsamplereliabilityandfactorstructureofthetoweroflondonandgonogocomputerizedtasks AT magdalenakerestey assessmentofmotorplanningandinhibitionperformanceinnonclinicalsamplereliabilityandfactorstructureofthetoweroflondonandgonogocomputerizedtasks AT pavlokerestey assessmentofmotorplanningandinhibitionperformanceinnonclinicalsamplereliabilityandfactorstructureofthetoweroflondonandgonogocomputerizedtasks AT stanisławradon assessmentofmotorplanningandinhibitionperformanceinnonclinicalsamplereliabilityandfactorstructureofthetoweroflondonandgonogocomputerizedtasks AT shanetmueller assessmentofmotorplanningandinhibitionperformanceinnonclinicalsamplereliabilityandfactorstructureofthetoweroflondonandgonogocomputerizedtasks
_version_	1718412870537969664

Assessment of Motor Planning and Inhibition Performance in Non-Clinical Sample—Reliability and Factor Structure of the Tower of London and Go/No Go Computerized Tasks

Ejemplares similares