Highly Reproducible 16S Sequencing Facilitates Measurement of Host Genetic Influences on the Stickleback Gut Microbiome

ABSTRACT Multicellular organisms interact with resident microbes in important ways, and a better understanding of host-microbe interactions is aided by tools such as high-throughput 16S sequencing. However, rigorous evaluation of the veracity of these tools in a different context from which they wer...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clayton M. Small, Mark Currey, Emily A. Beck, Susan Bassham, William A. Cresko
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eadd0f761733448dbbfddb2ae162890c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eadd0f761733448dbbfddb2ae162890c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eadd0f761733448dbbfddb2ae162890c2021-12-02T19:47:34ZHighly Reproducible 16S Sequencing Facilitates Measurement of Host Genetic Influences on the Stickleback Gut Microbiome10.1128/mSystems.00331-192379-5077https://doaj.org/article/eadd0f761733448dbbfddb2ae162890c2019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mSystems.00331-19https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5077ABSTRACT Multicellular organisms interact with resident microbes in important ways, and a better understanding of host-microbe interactions is aided by tools such as high-throughput 16S sequencing. However, rigorous evaluation of the veracity of these tools in a different context from which they were developed has often lagged behind. Our goal was to perform one such critical test by examining how variation in tissue preparation and DNA isolation could affect inferences about gut microbiome variation between two genetically divergent lines of threespine stickleback fish maintained in the same laboratory environment. Using careful experimental design and intensive sampling of individuals, we addressed technical and biological sources of variation in 16S-based estimates of microbial diversity. After employing a two-tiered bead beating approach that comprised tissue homogenization followed by microbial lysis in subsamples, we found an extremely minor effect of DNA isolation protocol relative to among-host microbial diversity differences. Abundance estimates for rare operational taxonomic units (OTUs), however, showed much lower reproducibility. Gut microbiome composition was highly variable across fish—even among cohoused siblings—relative to technical replicates, but a subtle effect of host genotype (stickleback line) was nevertheless detected for some microbial taxa. IMPORTANCE Our findings demonstrate the importance of appropriately quantifying biological and technical variance components when attempting to understand major influences on high-throughput microbiome data. Our focus was on understanding among-host (biological) variance in community metrics and its magnitude in relation to within-host (technical) variance, because meaningful comparisons among individuals are necessary in addressing major questions in host-microbe ecology and evolution, such as heritability of the microbiome. Our study design and insights should provide a useful example for others desiring to quantify microbiome variation at biological levels in the face of various technical factors in a variety of systems.Clayton M. SmallMark CurreyEmily A. BeckSusan BasshamWilliam A. CreskoAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleDNA isolationfish modelhost-microbe systemsmicrobial ecologyrepeatabilityreproducibilityMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmSystems, Vol 4, Iss 4 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic DNA isolation
fish model
host-microbe systems
microbial ecology
repeatability
reproducibility
Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle DNA isolation
fish model
host-microbe systems
microbial ecology
repeatability
reproducibility
Microbiology
QR1-502
Clayton M. Small
Mark Currey
Emily A. Beck
Susan Bassham
William A. Cresko
Highly Reproducible 16S Sequencing Facilitates Measurement of Host Genetic Influences on the Stickleback Gut Microbiome
description ABSTRACT Multicellular organisms interact with resident microbes in important ways, and a better understanding of host-microbe interactions is aided by tools such as high-throughput 16S sequencing. However, rigorous evaluation of the veracity of these tools in a different context from which they were developed has often lagged behind. Our goal was to perform one such critical test by examining how variation in tissue preparation and DNA isolation could affect inferences about gut microbiome variation between two genetically divergent lines of threespine stickleback fish maintained in the same laboratory environment. Using careful experimental design and intensive sampling of individuals, we addressed technical and biological sources of variation in 16S-based estimates of microbial diversity. After employing a two-tiered bead beating approach that comprised tissue homogenization followed by microbial lysis in subsamples, we found an extremely minor effect of DNA isolation protocol relative to among-host microbial diversity differences. Abundance estimates for rare operational taxonomic units (OTUs), however, showed much lower reproducibility. Gut microbiome composition was highly variable across fish—even among cohoused siblings—relative to technical replicates, but a subtle effect of host genotype (stickleback line) was nevertheless detected for some microbial taxa. IMPORTANCE Our findings demonstrate the importance of appropriately quantifying biological and technical variance components when attempting to understand major influences on high-throughput microbiome data. Our focus was on understanding among-host (biological) variance in community metrics and its magnitude in relation to within-host (technical) variance, because meaningful comparisons among individuals are necessary in addressing major questions in host-microbe ecology and evolution, such as heritability of the microbiome. Our study design and insights should provide a useful example for others desiring to quantify microbiome variation at biological levels in the face of various technical factors in a variety of systems.
format article
author Clayton M. Small
Mark Currey
Emily A. Beck
Susan Bassham
William A. Cresko
author_facet Clayton M. Small
Mark Currey
Emily A. Beck
Susan Bassham
William A. Cresko
author_sort Clayton M. Small
title Highly Reproducible 16S Sequencing Facilitates Measurement of Host Genetic Influences on the Stickleback Gut Microbiome
title_short Highly Reproducible 16S Sequencing Facilitates Measurement of Host Genetic Influences on the Stickleback Gut Microbiome
title_full Highly Reproducible 16S Sequencing Facilitates Measurement of Host Genetic Influences on the Stickleback Gut Microbiome
title_fullStr Highly Reproducible 16S Sequencing Facilitates Measurement of Host Genetic Influences on the Stickleback Gut Microbiome
title_full_unstemmed Highly Reproducible 16S Sequencing Facilitates Measurement of Host Genetic Influences on the Stickleback Gut Microbiome
title_sort highly reproducible 16s sequencing facilitates measurement of host genetic influences on the stickleback gut microbiome
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/eadd0f761733448dbbfddb2ae162890c
work_keys_str_mv AT claytonmsmall highlyreproducible16ssequencingfacilitatesmeasurementofhostgeneticinfluencesonthesticklebackgutmicrobiome
AT markcurrey highlyreproducible16ssequencingfacilitatesmeasurementofhostgeneticinfluencesonthesticklebackgutmicrobiome
AT emilyabeck highlyreproducible16ssequencingfacilitatesmeasurementofhostgeneticinfluencesonthesticklebackgutmicrobiome
AT susanbassham highlyreproducible16ssequencingfacilitatesmeasurementofhostgeneticinfluencesonthesticklebackgutmicrobiome
AT williamacresko highlyreproducible16ssequencingfacilitatesmeasurementofhostgeneticinfluencesonthesticklebackgutmicrobiome
_version_ 1718375997792845824