Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension

Objective. To determine the validity and reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension (TAQPH), Spanish version, designed by Chunhua Ma et al. Methods. This study was carried out in the city of Ibagué (Colombia)  and the test validation determined validity (fac...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natalia Esquivel Garzón, Luz Patricia Díaz Heredia
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Universidad de Antioquia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eb3549f6df2149c0b8ba3583408a753a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eb3549f6df2149c0b8ba3583408a753a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eb3549f6df2149c0b8ba3583408a753a2021-11-26T20:40:56ZValidity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension2216-028010.17533/udea.iee.v37n3e09https://doaj.org/article/eb3549f6df2149c0b8ba3583408a753a2019-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/iee/article/view/340129https://doaj.org/toc/2216-0280Objective. To determine the validity and reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension (TAQPH), Spanish version, designed by Chunhua Ma et al. Methods. This study was carried out in the city of Ibagué (Colombia)  and the test validation determined validity (face, content, and construct) and reliability. Face and content validity were conducted through expert judgment, using Fleiss’ Kappa Coefficient statistical tests and modified Lawshe’s content validity index. The construct validity and the reliability test had the participation of 220 people with diagnosis of primary hypertension. Reliability was calculated through Cronbach’s alpha statistical test. Results. In the face validity, the instrument reported a Fleiss’ Kappa index was 0.68 in comprehension, 0.76 in clarity, and 0.64 in accuracy, interpreted as a substantial agreement. The content validity index was satisfactory with 0.91; el exploratory factor analysis reported six factors with a total variance explained of 54%. Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.74. Conclusion. The Spanish version of the TAQPH is a valid and reliable scale to evaluate adherence to treatment in patients with primary hypertension.   How to cite this article: Esquivel N, Díaz LP. Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2019; 37(3):e09.Natalia Esquivel GarzónLuz Patricia Díaz HerediaUniversidad de Antioquiaarticleessential hypertensiontreatment adherence and compliancesurveys and questionnairespsychometricsvalidation studies.NursingRT1-120ENInvestigación y Educación en Enfermería, Vol 37, Iss 3 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic essential hypertension
treatment adherence and compliance
surveys and questionnaires
psychometrics
validation studies.
Nursing
RT1-120
spellingShingle essential hypertension
treatment adherence and compliance
surveys and questionnaires
psychometrics
validation studies.
Nursing
RT1-120
Natalia Esquivel Garzón
Luz Patricia Díaz Heredia
Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension
description Objective. To determine the validity and reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension (TAQPH), Spanish version, designed by Chunhua Ma et al. Methods. This study was carried out in the city of Ibagué (Colombia)  and the test validation determined validity (face, content, and construct) and reliability. Face and content validity were conducted through expert judgment, using Fleiss’ Kappa Coefficient statistical tests and modified Lawshe’s content validity index. The construct validity and the reliability test had the participation of 220 people with diagnosis of primary hypertension. Reliability was calculated through Cronbach’s alpha statistical test. Results. In the face validity, the instrument reported a Fleiss’ Kappa index was 0.68 in comprehension, 0.76 in clarity, and 0.64 in accuracy, interpreted as a substantial agreement. The content validity index was satisfactory with 0.91; el exploratory factor analysis reported six factors with a total variance explained of 54%. Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.74. Conclusion. The Spanish version of the TAQPH is a valid and reliable scale to evaluate adherence to treatment in patients with primary hypertension.   How to cite this article: Esquivel N, Díaz LP. Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2019; 37(3):e09.
format article
author Natalia Esquivel Garzón
Luz Patricia Díaz Heredia
author_facet Natalia Esquivel Garzón
Luz Patricia Díaz Heredia
author_sort Natalia Esquivel Garzón
title Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension
title_short Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension
title_full Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension
title_sort validity and reliability of the treatment adherence questionnaire for patients with hypertension
publisher Universidad de Antioquia
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/eb3549f6df2149c0b8ba3583408a753a
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliaesquivelgarzon validityandreliabilityofthetreatmentadherencequestionnaireforpatientswithhypertension
AT luzpatriciadiazheredia validityandreliabilityofthetreatmentadherencequestionnaireforpatientswithhypertension
_version_ 1718409263756345344