Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs

Abstract The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) have appeared promising as replacements for antibiotics in in vitro studies. Microencapsulation, especially by the spray-drying method, has been used to preserve their num...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pawiya Pupa, Prasert Apiwatsiri, Wandee Sirichokchatchawan, Nopadon Pirarat, Tanawong Maison, Anantawat Koontanatechanon, Nuvee Prapasarakul
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eb460bb01b8d4e8e9e20c0b5cdf0d6f9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eb460bb01b8d4e8e9e20c0b5cdf0d6f9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eb460bb01b8d4e8e9e20c0b5cdf0d6f92021-12-02T15:02:52ZUse of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs10.1038/s41598-021-91427-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/eb460bb01b8d4e8e9e20c0b5cdf0d6f92021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91427-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) have appeared promising as replacements for antibiotics in in vitro studies. Microencapsulation, especially by the spray-drying method, has been used to preserve their numbers and characteristics during storage and digestion. This study compared the efficacy of these strains and their microencapsulated form with antibiotic usage on growth performance, faecal microbial counts, and intestinal morphology in nursing-finishing pigs. A total of 240 healthy neonatal pigs were treated on days 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 after cross-fostering. Sterile peptone water was delivered orally to the control and antibiotic groups. Spray-dried Lactobacillus plantarum strain 22F stored for 6-months was administered to piglets in the spraydry group. Three ml of each the three fresh strains (109 CFU/mL) were orally administered to piglets in each group. All pigs received the basal diets, but these were supplemented with routine antibiotic for the antibiotic group. Pigs in all the probiotic supplemented groups exhibited a better average daily gain and feed conversion ratio than those of the controls in the nursery and grower phases. Probiotic supplementation increased viable lactobacilli and decreased enterobacterial counts. Antibiotic additives reduced both enterobacterial and lactobacilli counts. Villous height and villous height:crypt depth ratio were greater in probiotic and antibiotic supplemented pigs comparing to the controls, especially in the jejunum. The results demonstrated the feasibility of using these strains as a substitute for antibiotics and the practicality of the microencapsulation protocol for use in swine farms.Pawiya PupaPrasert ApiwatsiriWandee SirichokchatchawanNopadon PiraratTanawong MaisonAnantawat KoontanatechanonNuvee PrapasarakulNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Pawiya Pupa
Prasert Apiwatsiri
Wandee Sirichokchatchawan
Nopadon Pirarat
Tanawong Maison
Anantawat Koontanatechanon
Nuvee Prapasarakul
Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs
description Abstract The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) have appeared promising as replacements for antibiotics in in vitro studies. Microencapsulation, especially by the spray-drying method, has been used to preserve their numbers and characteristics during storage and digestion. This study compared the efficacy of these strains and their microencapsulated form with antibiotic usage on growth performance, faecal microbial counts, and intestinal morphology in nursing-finishing pigs. A total of 240 healthy neonatal pigs were treated on days 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 after cross-fostering. Sterile peptone water was delivered orally to the control and antibiotic groups. Spray-dried Lactobacillus plantarum strain 22F stored for 6-months was administered to piglets in the spraydry group. Three ml of each the three fresh strains (109 CFU/mL) were orally administered to piglets in each group. All pigs received the basal diets, but these were supplemented with routine antibiotic for the antibiotic group. Pigs in all the probiotic supplemented groups exhibited a better average daily gain and feed conversion ratio than those of the controls in the nursery and grower phases. Probiotic supplementation increased viable lactobacilli and decreased enterobacterial counts. Antibiotic additives reduced both enterobacterial and lactobacilli counts. Villous height and villous height:crypt depth ratio were greater in probiotic and antibiotic supplemented pigs comparing to the controls, especially in the jejunum. The results demonstrated the feasibility of using these strains as a substitute for antibiotics and the practicality of the microencapsulation protocol for use in swine farms.
format article
author Pawiya Pupa
Prasert Apiwatsiri
Wandee Sirichokchatchawan
Nopadon Pirarat
Tanawong Maison
Anantawat Koontanatechanon
Nuvee Prapasarakul
author_facet Pawiya Pupa
Prasert Apiwatsiri
Wandee Sirichokchatchawan
Nopadon Pirarat
Tanawong Maison
Anantawat Koontanatechanon
Nuvee Prapasarakul
author_sort Pawiya Pupa
title Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs
title_short Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs
title_full Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs
title_fullStr Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs
title_full_unstemmed Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs
title_sort use of lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22f and 25f) and pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72n) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/eb460bb01b8d4e8e9e20c0b5cdf0d6f9
work_keys_str_mv AT pawiyapupa useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs
AT prasertapiwatsiri useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs
AT wandeesirichokchatchawan useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs
AT nopadonpirarat useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs
AT tanawongmaison useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs
AT anantawatkoontanatechanon useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs
AT nuveeprapasarakul useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs
_version_ 1718389110871162880