Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs
Abstract The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) have appeared promising as replacements for antibiotics in in vitro studies. Microencapsulation, especially by the spray-drying method, has been used to preserve their num...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/eb460bb01b8d4e8e9e20c0b5cdf0d6f9 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:eb460bb01b8d4e8e9e20c0b5cdf0d6f9 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:eb460bb01b8d4e8e9e20c0b5cdf0d6f92021-12-02T15:02:52ZUse of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs10.1038/s41598-021-91427-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/eb460bb01b8d4e8e9e20c0b5cdf0d6f92021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91427-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) have appeared promising as replacements for antibiotics in in vitro studies. Microencapsulation, especially by the spray-drying method, has been used to preserve their numbers and characteristics during storage and digestion. This study compared the efficacy of these strains and their microencapsulated form with antibiotic usage on growth performance, faecal microbial counts, and intestinal morphology in nursing-finishing pigs. A total of 240 healthy neonatal pigs were treated on days 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 after cross-fostering. Sterile peptone water was delivered orally to the control and antibiotic groups. Spray-dried Lactobacillus plantarum strain 22F stored for 6-months was administered to piglets in the spraydry group. Three ml of each the three fresh strains (109 CFU/mL) were orally administered to piglets in each group. All pigs received the basal diets, but these were supplemented with routine antibiotic for the antibiotic group. Pigs in all the probiotic supplemented groups exhibited a better average daily gain and feed conversion ratio than those of the controls in the nursery and grower phases. Probiotic supplementation increased viable lactobacilli and decreased enterobacterial counts. Antibiotic additives reduced both enterobacterial and lactobacilli counts. Villous height and villous height:crypt depth ratio were greater in probiotic and antibiotic supplemented pigs comparing to the controls, especially in the jejunum. The results demonstrated the feasibility of using these strains as a substitute for antibiotics and the practicality of the microencapsulation protocol for use in swine farms.Pawiya PupaPrasert ApiwatsiriWandee SirichokchatchawanNopadon PiraratTanawong MaisonAnantawat KoontanatechanonNuvee PrapasarakulNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Pawiya Pupa Prasert Apiwatsiri Wandee Sirichokchatchawan Nopadon Pirarat Tanawong Maison Anantawat Koontanatechanon Nuvee Prapasarakul Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
description |
Abstract The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) have appeared promising as replacements for antibiotics in in vitro studies. Microencapsulation, especially by the spray-drying method, has been used to preserve their numbers and characteristics during storage and digestion. This study compared the efficacy of these strains and their microencapsulated form with antibiotic usage on growth performance, faecal microbial counts, and intestinal morphology in nursing-finishing pigs. A total of 240 healthy neonatal pigs were treated on days 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 after cross-fostering. Sterile peptone water was delivered orally to the control and antibiotic groups. Spray-dried Lactobacillus plantarum strain 22F stored for 6-months was administered to piglets in the spraydry group. Three ml of each the three fresh strains (109 CFU/mL) were orally administered to piglets in each group. All pigs received the basal diets, but these were supplemented with routine antibiotic for the antibiotic group. Pigs in all the probiotic supplemented groups exhibited a better average daily gain and feed conversion ratio than those of the controls in the nursery and grower phases. Probiotic supplementation increased viable lactobacilli and decreased enterobacterial counts. Antibiotic additives reduced both enterobacterial and lactobacilli counts. Villous height and villous height:crypt depth ratio were greater in probiotic and antibiotic supplemented pigs comparing to the controls, especially in the jejunum. The results demonstrated the feasibility of using these strains as a substitute for antibiotics and the practicality of the microencapsulation protocol for use in swine farms. |
format |
article |
author |
Pawiya Pupa Prasert Apiwatsiri Wandee Sirichokchatchawan Nopadon Pirarat Tanawong Maison Anantawat Koontanatechanon Nuvee Prapasarakul |
author_facet |
Pawiya Pupa Prasert Apiwatsiri Wandee Sirichokchatchawan Nopadon Pirarat Tanawong Maison Anantawat Koontanatechanon Nuvee Prapasarakul |
author_sort |
Pawiya Pupa |
title |
Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title_short |
Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title_full |
Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title_fullStr |
Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title_sort |
use of lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22f and 25f) and pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72n) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/eb460bb01b8d4e8e9e20c0b5cdf0d6f9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pawiyapupa useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT prasertapiwatsiri useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT wandeesirichokchatchawan useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT nopadonpirarat useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT tanawongmaison useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT anantawatkoontanatechanon useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT nuveeprapasarakul useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs |
_version_ |
1718389110871162880 |