Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial
Abstract This study aimed to examine the effect of repeated anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) on learning a split-belt treadmill task. Thirty healthy individuals randomly received three consecutive sessions of active or sham anodal ctDCS during split-belt treadmill tr...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/eb47985f094440c2a8716877eeb3f7b4 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:eb47985f094440c2a8716877eeb3f7b4 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:eb47985f094440c2a8716877eeb3f7b42021-12-02T15:33:10ZCerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial10.1038/s41598-020-68825-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/eb47985f094440c2a8716877eeb3f7b42020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68825-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This study aimed to examine the effect of repeated anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) on learning a split-belt treadmill task. Thirty healthy individuals randomly received three consecutive sessions of active or sham anodal ctDCS during split-belt treadmill training. Motor performance and strides to steady-state performance were evaluated before (baseline), during (adaptation), and after (de-adaptation) the intervention. The outcomes were measured one week later to assess absolute learning and during the intervention to evaluate cumulative, consecutive, and session-specific effects. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects regression models. During adaptation, there was no significant difference in absolute learning between the groups (p > 0.05). During de-adaptation, a significant difference in absolute learning between the groups (p = 0.03) indicated slower de-adaptation with anodal ctDCS. Pre-planned secondary analysis revealed that anodal ctDCS significantly reduced the cumulative (p = 0.01) and consecutive-session effect (p = 0.01) on immediate adaptation. There were significant cumulative (p = 0.02) and session-specific effects (p = 0.003) on immediate de-adaptation. Repeated anodal ctDCS does not enhance motor learning measured during adaptation to a split-belt treadmill task. However, it influences the maintenance of learnt walking patterns, suggesting that it may be beneficial in maintaining therapeutic effects.Nitika KumariDenise TaylorUsman RashidAlain C. VandalPaul F. SmithNada SignalNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Nitika Kumari Denise Taylor Usman Rashid Alain C. Vandal Paul F. Smith Nada Signal Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial |
description |
Abstract This study aimed to examine the effect of repeated anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) on learning a split-belt treadmill task. Thirty healthy individuals randomly received three consecutive sessions of active or sham anodal ctDCS during split-belt treadmill training. Motor performance and strides to steady-state performance were evaluated before (baseline), during (adaptation), and after (de-adaptation) the intervention. The outcomes were measured one week later to assess absolute learning and during the intervention to evaluate cumulative, consecutive, and session-specific effects. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects regression models. During adaptation, there was no significant difference in absolute learning between the groups (p > 0.05). During de-adaptation, a significant difference in absolute learning between the groups (p = 0.03) indicated slower de-adaptation with anodal ctDCS. Pre-planned secondary analysis revealed that anodal ctDCS significantly reduced the cumulative (p = 0.01) and consecutive-session effect (p = 0.01) on immediate adaptation. There were significant cumulative (p = 0.02) and session-specific effects (p = 0.003) on immediate de-adaptation. Repeated anodal ctDCS does not enhance motor learning measured during adaptation to a split-belt treadmill task. However, it influences the maintenance of learnt walking patterns, suggesting that it may be beneficial in maintaining therapeutic effects. |
format |
article |
author |
Nitika Kumari Denise Taylor Usman Rashid Alain C. Vandal Paul F. Smith Nada Signal |
author_facet |
Nitika Kumari Denise Taylor Usman Rashid Alain C. Vandal Paul F. Smith Nada Signal |
author_sort |
Nitika Kumari |
title |
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short |
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full |
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort |
cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/eb47985f094440c2a8716877eeb3f7b4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nitikakumari cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT denisetaylor cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT usmanrashid cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT alaincvandal cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT paulfsmith cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nadasignal cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1718387117840662528 |