Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract This study aimed to examine the effect of repeated anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) on learning a split-belt treadmill task. Thirty healthy individuals randomly received three consecutive sessions of active or sham anodal ctDCS during split-belt treadmill tr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nitika Kumari, Denise Taylor, Usman Rashid, Alain C. Vandal, Paul F. Smith, Nada Signal
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eb47985f094440c2a8716877eeb3f7b4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eb47985f094440c2a8716877eeb3f7b4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eb47985f094440c2a8716877eeb3f7b42021-12-02T15:33:10ZCerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial10.1038/s41598-020-68825-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/eb47985f094440c2a8716877eeb3f7b42020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68825-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This study aimed to examine the effect of repeated anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) on learning a split-belt treadmill task. Thirty healthy individuals randomly received three consecutive sessions of active or sham anodal ctDCS during split-belt treadmill training. Motor performance and strides to steady-state performance were evaluated before (baseline), during (adaptation), and after (de-adaptation) the intervention. The outcomes were measured one week later to assess absolute learning and during the intervention to evaluate cumulative, consecutive, and session-specific effects. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects regression models. During adaptation, there was no significant difference in absolute learning between the groups (p > 0.05). During de-adaptation, a significant difference in absolute learning between the groups (p = 0.03) indicated slower de-adaptation with anodal ctDCS. Pre-planned secondary analysis revealed that anodal ctDCS significantly reduced the cumulative (p = 0.01) and consecutive-session effect (p = 0.01) on immediate adaptation. There were significant cumulative (p = 0.02) and session-specific effects (p = 0.003) on immediate de-adaptation. Repeated anodal ctDCS does not enhance motor learning measured during adaptation to a split-belt treadmill task. However, it influences the maintenance of learnt walking patterns, suggesting that it may be beneficial in maintaining therapeutic effects.Nitika KumariDenise TaylorUsman RashidAlain C. VandalPaul F. SmithNada SignalNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Nitika Kumari
Denise Taylor
Usman Rashid
Alain C. Vandal
Paul F. Smith
Nada Signal
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial
description Abstract This study aimed to examine the effect of repeated anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) on learning a split-belt treadmill task. Thirty healthy individuals randomly received three consecutive sessions of active or sham anodal ctDCS during split-belt treadmill training. Motor performance and strides to steady-state performance were evaluated before (baseline), during (adaptation), and after (de-adaptation) the intervention. The outcomes were measured one week later to assess absolute learning and during the intervention to evaluate cumulative, consecutive, and session-specific effects. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects regression models. During adaptation, there was no significant difference in absolute learning between the groups (p > 0.05). During de-adaptation, a significant difference in absolute learning between the groups (p = 0.03) indicated slower de-adaptation with anodal ctDCS. Pre-planned secondary analysis revealed that anodal ctDCS significantly reduced the cumulative (p = 0.01) and consecutive-session effect (p = 0.01) on immediate adaptation. There were significant cumulative (p = 0.02) and session-specific effects (p = 0.003) on immediate de-adaptation. Repeated anodal ctDCS does not enhance motor learning measured during adaptation to a split-belt treadmill task. However, it influences the maintenance of learnt walking patterns, suggesting that it may be beneficial in maintaining therapeutic effects.
format article
author Nitika Kumari
Denise Taylor
Usman Rashid
Alain C. Vandal
Paul F. Smith
Nada Signal
author_facet Nitika Kumari
Denise Taylor
Usman Rashid
Alain C. Vandal
Paul F. Smith
Nada Signal
author_sort Nitika Kumari
title Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/eb47985f094440c2a8716877eeb3f7b4
work_keys_str_mv AT nitikakumari cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT denisetaylor cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT usmanrashid cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT alaincvandal cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT paulfsmith cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nadasignal cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationforlearninganovelsplitbelttreadmilltaskarandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718387117840662528