F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: History and Typology of Commentary
The article reviews the history and conception typology of the novel by F.M. Dostoevsky called “Idiot” in XX century. The pluralism in understanding of purposes and objectives of its commenting which appeared between two centuries is stated, as a result the text comments and interpretation of its co...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN RU |
| Publicado: |
Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/eb6325b782a8450dbaed3ee87a504f79 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:eb6325b782a8450dbaed3ee87a504f79 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:eb6325b782a8450dbaed3ee87a504f792021-12-02T18:55:03ZF. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: History and Typology of Commentary10.22455/2619-0311-2018-4-194-2002619-03112712-8512https://doaj.org/article/eb6325b782a8450dbaed3ee87a504f792018-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dostmirkult.ru/images/dost_2018-4а-INT-финал-196-202.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2619-0311https://doaj.org/toc/2712-8512The article reviews the history and conception typology of the novel by F.M. Dostoevsky called “Idiot” in XX century. The pluralism in understanding of purposes and objectives of its commenting which appeared between two centuries is stated, as a result the text comments and interpretation of its conception are mixed together. There is also a sharp polarization of alternative interpretations of this piece of work in the modern literature studies: the novel and its character are deemed on pro et contra principle. Hereof the simultaneous expression of Christian apology and demythologization of Myshkin's image which is caused by the receptive conflict in relation to him that is suddenly appeared in 1990 when the “inspection” of “Idiot” novel and the polemic around its principal character began. Polar opposite assessments of H. Holbein picture so ecphrasically described by Dostoevsky are considered as a stunning example of receptive and axiological conflict.Valentina V. BorisovaRussian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literaturearticlef.m. dostoevsky“idiot”commentsapology and demythologization of myshkin's imagereceptive conflicth. holbein pictureSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665ENRUДостоевский и мировая культура: Филологический журнал, Iss 4, Pp 194-200 (2018) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN RU |
| topic |
f.m. dostoevsky “idiot” comments apology and demythologization of myshkin's image receptive conflict h. holbein picture Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 |
| spellingShingle |
f.m. dostoevsky “idiot” comments apology and demythologization of myshkin's image receptive conflict h. holbein picture Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 Valentina V. Borisova F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: History and Typology of Commentary |
| description |
The article reviews the history and conception typology of the novel by F.M. Dostoevsky called “Idiot” in XX century. The pluralism in understanding of purposes and objectives of its commenting which appeared between two centuries is stated, as a result the text comments and interpretation of its conception are mixed together. There is also a sharp polarization of alternative interpretations of this piece of work in the modern literature studies: the novel and its character are deemed on pro et contra principle. Hereof the simultaneous expression of Christian apology and demythologization of Myshkin's image which is caused by the receptive conflict in relation to him that is suddenly appeared in 1990 when the “inspection” of “Idiot” novel and the polemic around its principal character began. Polar opposite assessments of H. Holbein picture so ecphrasically described by Dostoevsky are considered as a stunning example of receptive and axiological conflict. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Valentina V. Borisova |
| author_facet |
Valentina V. Borisova |
| author_sort |
Valentina V. Borisova |
| title |
F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: History and Typology of Commentary |
| title_short |
F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: History and Typology of Commentary |
| title_full |
F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: History and Typology of Commentary |
| title_fullStr |
F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: History and Typology of Commentary |
| title_full_unstemmed |
F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”: History and Typology of Commentary |
| title_sort |
f. m. dostoevsky’s novel “the idiot”: history and typology of commentary |
| publisher |
Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/eb6325b782a8450dbaed3ee87a504f79 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT valentinavborisova fmdostoevskysnoveltheidiothistoryandtypologyofcommentary |
| _version_ |
1718377361061183488 |