On Revisionism in Vygotskian Science. Commentary on «In August of 1941» by Yasnitsky and Lamdan (2017)

In this article we analyze the shift in Vygotskian science from “archival revolution” to the revelatory “revisionist revolution”, which Yasnitsky and colleagues proclaimed in 2012. The aim of revisionist revolu¬tion supporters is a critical analysis of the scientific heritage of Vygotsky, Luria and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Akhutina T.V.
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2021
Materias:	vygotsky luria cultural-historical psychology vygotskian heritage archival revolution revisionist revolution yasnitsky administrative prohibition History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/eb8a3b43dc9d41cba1bea45656746dc1
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:eb8a3b43dc9d41cba1bea45656746dc1
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:eb8a3b43dc9d41cba1bea45656746dc12021-11-30T09:48:16ZOn Revisionism in Vygotskian Science. Commentary on «In August of 1941» by Yasnitsky and Lamdan (2017)10.17759/chp.20211703191816-54352224-8935https://doaj.org/article/eb8a3b43dc9d41cba1bea45656746dc12021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2021/n3/Akhutina.shtmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1816-5435https://doaj.org/toc/2224-8935In this article we analyze the shift in Vygotskian science from “archival revolution” to the revelatory “revisionist revolution”, which Yasnitsky and colleagues proclaimed in 2012. The aim of revisionist revolu¬tion supporters is a critical analysis of the scientific heritage of Vygotsky, Luria and their colleagues, and the demythologization of Vygotsky’s personality as well as the scientific contribution of his school. We ana¬lyze in detail a selected set of the papers within “revisionist” movement and describe their advantages and disadvantages, and further question the soundness of statements of these papers. We justify our disagree¬ment with the exposed by revisionist papers undervaluation of the results of Luria’s Central Asian expedi¬tions. We also refute the assumptions of Yasnitsky and his colleagues about the absence of documentary evidence demonstrating that the heritage and name of Vygotsky were under administrative prohibition during the years of Stalinism, and provide corresponding documents. We conclude that ignorance of one group of facts, tendentious analysis of the other facts, and partiality in the discussion lead the researchers who work on “revisionist revolution” to misrepresent psychological science development.Akhutina T.V.Moscow State University of Psychology and Educationarticlevygotskyluriacultural-historical psychologyvygotskian heritagearchival revolutionrevisionist revolutionyasnitskyadministrative prohibitionHistory of scholarship and learning. The humanitiesAZ20-999ENRUКультурно-историческая психология, Vol 17, Iss 3, Pp 152-159 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	vygotsky luria cultural-historical psychology vygotskian heritage archival revolution revisionist revolution yasnitsky administrative prohibition History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999
spellingShingle	vygotsky luria cultural-historical psychology vygotskian heritage archival revolution revisionist revolution yasnitsky administrative prohibition History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999 Akhutina T.V. On Revisionism in Vygotskian Science. Commentary on «In August of 1941» by Yasnitsky and Lamdan (2017)
description	In this article we analyze the shift in Vygotskian science from “archival revolution” to the revelatory “revisionist revolution”, which Yasnitsky and colleagues proclaimed in 2012. The aim of revisionist revolu¬tion supporters is a critical analysis of the scientific heritage of Vygotsky, Luria and their colleagues, and the demythologization of Vygotsky’s personality as well as the scientific contribution of his school. We ana¬lyze in detail a selected set of the papers within “revisionist” movement and describe their advantages and disadvantages, and further question the soundness of statements of these papers. We justify our disagree¬ment with the exposed by revisionist papers undervaluation of the results of Luria’s Central Asian expedi¬tions. We also refute the assumptions of Yasnitsky and his colleagues about the absence of documentary evidence demonstrating that the heritage and name of Vygotsky were under administrative prohibition during the years of Stalinism, and provide corresponding documents. We conclude that ignorance of one group of facts, tendentious analysis of the other facts, and partiality in the discussion lead the researchers who work on “revisionist revolution” to misrepresent psychological science development.
format	article
author	Akhutina T.V.
author_facet	Akhutina T.V.
author_sort	Akhutina T.V.
title	On Revisionism in Vygotskian Science. Commentary on «In August of 1941» by Yasnitsky and Lamdan (2017)
title_short	On Revisionism in Vygotskian Science. Commentary on «In August of 1941» by Yasnitsky and Lamdan (2017)
title_full	On Revisionism in Vygotskian Science. Commentary on «In August of 1941» by Yasnitsky and Lamdan (2017)
title_fullStr	On Revisionism in Vygotskian Science. Commentary on «In August of 1941» by Yasnitsky and Lamdan (2017)
title_full_unstemmed	On Revisionism in Vygotskian Science. Commentary on «In August of 1941» by Yasnitsky and Lamdan (2017)
title_sort	on revisionism in vygotskian science. commentary on «in august of 1941» by yasnitsky and lamdan (2017)
publisher	Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/eb8a3b43dc9d41cba1bea45656746dc1
work_keys_str_mv	AT akhutinatv onrevisionisminvygotskiansciencecommentaryoninaugustof1941byyasnitskyandlamdan2017
_version_	1718406718704058368

On Revisionism in Vygotskian Science. Commentary on «In August of 1941» by Yasnitsky and Lamdan (2017)

Ejemplares similares