Comparison of Four Foraminiferal Biotic Indices Assessing the Environmental Quality of Coastal Mediterranean Soft Bottoms

Coastal environments are exposed to numerous pressures that potentially affect marine soft bottom faunas. Among these pressures, organic matter enrichment is very frequent. Several indices based on living (Rose Bengal-stained) foraminiferal communities have recently been developed to assess the indu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briz Parent, Christine Barras, Erica Bicchi, Laurie M. Charrieau, Constance Choquel, Éric Bénéteau, Grégoire M. Maillet, Frans J. Jorissen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
FSI
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eb8b7d4a0e4d437ab9173e28196a577c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eb8b7d4a0e4d437ab9173e28196a577c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eb8b7d4a0e4d437ab9173e28196a577c2021-11-25T19:15:24ZComparison of Four Foraminiferal Biotic Indices Assessing the Environmental Quality of Coastal Mediterranean Soft Bottoms10.3390/w132231932073-4441https://doaj.org/article/eb8b7d4a0e4d437ab9173e28196a577c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/22/3193https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4441Coastal environments are exposed to numerous pressures that potentially affect marine soft bottom faunas. Among these pressures, organic matter enrichment is very frequent. Several indices based on living (Rose Bengal-stained) foraminiferal communities have recently been developed to assess the induced impact and determine the environmental quality of these environments. Here, we use an open waters Mediterranean Sea data set to test the benefits and drawbacks of four foraminiferal indices: (1) the effective number of species (exp(H’<sub>bc</sub>)), (2) the Tolerant Species Index for the Mediterranean (TSI-Med), (3) the Foraminifera AMBI (Foram-AMBI), and (4) the Foram Stress Index (FSI). These indices all intend to measure the response of the foraminiferal communities to organic matter enrichment, and therefore, their results should be very similar. We found that the diversity-based index, exp(H’<sub>bc</sub>), was not suitable to evaluate the environmental quality of our Mediterranean coastal settings, as it had a non-monotonic relationship with the organic matter enrichment gradient. The three indices based on groups of indicator species (TSI-Med, Foram-AMBI, and FSI) yielded fairly similar results. For Foram-AMBI, using only assigned species to calculate proportions of indicator species partly avoided to misinterpret the results. In TSI-Med, a correction based on sediment grain size is applied to distinguish between natural and anthropogenic organic enrichment. Such a correction could also be added to Foram-AMBI and FSI. The limits between the Ecological Quality Status (EQS) classes used for macrofauna were not adapted for Foram-AMBI. Here, we propose new EQS class limits for the Foram-AMBI as follows: very good: 0 ≤ x < 1.4; good: 1.4 ≤ x < 2.4; moderate: 2.4 ≤ x < 3.4; poor: 3.4 ≤ x < 4.4; bad: 4.4 ≤ x ≤ 6. These limits could evolve in the future as new data become available, especially with a poor and bad environmental quality.Briz ParentChristine BarrasErica BicchiLaurie M. CharrieauConstance ChoquelÉric BénéteauGrégoire M. MailletFrans J. JorissenMDPI AGarticlebiomonitoringTSI-MedForam-AMBIFSIeffective number of speciesorganic matter enrichmentHydraulic engineeringTC1-978Water supply for domestic and industrial purposesTD201-500ENWater, Vol 13, Iss 3193, p 3193 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic biomonitoring
TSI-Med
Foram-AMBI
FSI
effective number of species
organic matter enrichment
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
spellingShingle biomonitoring
TSI-Med
Foram-AMBI
FSI
effective number of species
organic matter enrichment
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
Briz Parent
Christine Barras
Erica Bicchi
Laurie M. Charrieau
Constance Choquel
Éric Bénéteau
Grégoire M. Maillet
Frans J. Jorissen
Comparison of Four Foraminiferal Biotic Indices Assessing the Environmental Quality of Coastal Mediterranean Soft Bottoms
description Coastal environments are exposed to numerous pressures that potentially affect marine soft bottom faunas. Among these pressures, organic matter enrichment is very frequent. Several indices based on living (Rose Bengal-stained) foraminiferal communities have recently been developed to assess the induced impact and determine the environmental quality of these environments. Here, we use an open waters Mediterranean Sea data set to test the benefits and drawbacks of four foraminiferal indices: (1) the effective number of species (exp(H’<sub>bc</sub>)), (2) the Tolerant Species Index for the Mediterranean (TSI-Med), (3) the Foraminifera AMBI (Foram-AMBI), and (4) the Foram Stress Index (FSI). These indices all intend to measure the response of the foraminiferal communities to organic matter enrichment, and therefore, their results should be very similar. We found that the diversity-based index, exp(H’<sub>bc</sub>), was not suitable to evaluate the environmental quality of our Mediterranean coastal settings, as it had a non-monotonic relationship with the organic matter enrichment gradient. The three indices based on groups of indicator species (TSI-Med, Foram-AMBI, and FSI) yielded fairly similar results. For Foram-AMBI, using only assigned species to calculate proportions of indicator species partly avoided to misinterpret the results. In TSI-Med, a correction based on sediment grain size is applied to distinguish between natural and anthropogenic organic enrichment. Such a correction could also be added to Foram-AMBI and FSI. The limits between the Ecological Quality Status (EQS) classes used for macrofauna were not adapted for Foram-AMBI. Here, we propose new EQS class limits for the Foram-AMBI as follows: very good: 0 ≤ x < 1.4; good: 1.4 ≤ x < 2.4; moderate: 2.4 ≤ x < 3.4; poor: 3.4 ≤ x < 4.4; bad: 4.4 ≤ x ≤ 6. These limits could evolve in the future as new data become available, especially with a poor and bad environmental quality.
format article
author Briz Parent
Christine Barras
Erica Bicchi
Laurie M. Charrieau
Constance Choquel
Éric Bénéteau
Grégoire M. Maillet
Frans J. Jorissen
author_facet Briz Parent
Christine Barras
Erica Bicchi
Laurie M. Charrieau
Constance Choquel
Éric Bénéteau
Grégoire M. Maillet
Frans J. Jorissen
author_sort Briz Parent
title Comparison of Four Foraminiferal Biotic Indices Assessing the Environmental Quality of Coastal Mediterranean Soft Bottoms
title_short Comparison of Four Foraminiferal Biotic Indices Assessing the Environmental Quality of Coastal Mediterranean Soft Bottoms
title_full Comparison of Four Foraminiferal Biotic Indices Assessing the Environmental Quality of Coastal Mediterranean Soft Bottoms
title_fullStr Comparison of Four Foraminiferal Biotic Indices Assessing the Environmental Quality of Coastal Mediterranean Soft Bottoms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Four Foraminiferal Biotic Indices Assessing the Environmental Quality of Coastal Mediterranean Soft Bottoms
title_sort comparison of four foraminiferal biotic indices assessing the environmental quality of coastal mediterranean soft bottoms
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/eb8b7d4a0e4d437ab9173e28196a577c
work_keys_str_mv AT brizparent comparisonoffourforaminiferalbioticindicesassessingtheenvironmentalqualityofcoastalmediterraneansoftbottoms
AT christinebarras comparisonoffourforaminiferalbioticindicesassessingtheenvironmentalqualityofcoastalmediterraneansoftbottoms
AT ericabicchi comparisonoffourforaminiferalbioticindicesassessingtheenvironmentalqualityofcoastalmediterraneansoftbottoms
AT lauriemcharrieau comparisonoffourforaminiferalbioticindicesassessingtheenvironmentalqualityofcoastalmediterraneansoftbottoms
AT constancechoquel comparisonoffourforaminiferalbioticindicesassessingtheenvironmentalqualityofcoastalmediterraneansoftbottoms
AT ericbeneteau comparisonoffourforaminiferalbioticindicesassessingtheenvironmentalqualityofcoastalmediterraneansoftbottoms
AT gregoiremmaillet comparisonoffourforaminiferalbioticindicesassessingtheenvironmentalqualityofcoastalmediterraneansoftbottoms
AT fransjjorissen comparisonoffourforaminiferalbioticindicesassessingtheenvironmentalqualityofcoastalmediterraneansoftbottoms
_version_ 1718410128830496768