Do author-suggested reviewers rate submissions more favorably than editor-suggested reviewers? A study on atmospheric chemistry and physics.
<h4>Background</h4>Ratings in journal peer review can be affected by sources of bias. The bias variable investigated here was the information on whether authors had suggested a possible reviewer for their manuscript, and whether the editor had taken up that suggestion or had chosen a rev...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/eb8d80bd5d314485804a9db1cfb31074 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Declining orangutan encounter rates from Wallace to the present suggest the species was once more abundant.
por: Erik Meijaard, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Improving Submissions to Scholarly Journals via Peer Review
por: Lilia Raitskaya, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
REVIEW: More than just a naughty boy
por: Philip Cass
Publicado: (2017) -
Indonesia Well Abandonment Standard Gap Analysis; A Review and Suggestion
por: Ganesha R Darmawan
Publicado: (2021) -
Inequality in genetic cancer risk suggests bad genes rather than bad luck
por: Mats Julius Stensrud, et al.
Publicado: (2017)