Do author-suggested reviewers rate submissions more favorably than editor-suggested reviewers? A study on atmospheric chemistry and physics.
<h4>Background</h4>Ratings in journal peer review can be affected by sources of bias. The bias variable investigated here was the information on whether authors had suggested a possible reviewer for their manuscript, and whether the editor had taken up that suggestion or had chosen a rev...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/eb8d80bd5d314485804a9db1cfb31074 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Declining orangutan encounter rates from Wallace to the present suggest the species was once more abundant.
par: Erik Meijaard, et autres
Publié: (2010) -
Improving Submissions to Scholarly Journals via Peer Review
par: Lilia Raitskaya, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
REVIEW: More than just a naughty boy
par: Philip Cass
Publié: (2017) -
Indonesia Well Abandonment Standard Gap Analysis; A Review and Suggestion
par: Ganesha R Darmawan
Publié: (2021) -
Inequality in genetic cancer risk suggests bad genes rather than bad luck
par: Mats Julius Stensrud, et autres
Publié: (2017)