A comparative study on hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation with sequential or simultaneous integrated boost on different positions after breast-conserving surgery

Abstract This study explored the dosimetric difference between hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HFWBI) with sequential boost (SEB) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) based on supine and prone positions to identify the superior boost mode and superior position. Thirty breast cancer pat...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Ting Yu, Yankang Li, Tao Sun, Min Xu, Wei Wang, Qian Shao, Yingjie Zhang, Jianbin Li, Jinming Yu
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: Nature Portfolio 2021
Sujets:
R
Q
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/ebc2ac0f418b421a80b61b4d723ccf19
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
Description
Résumé:Abstract This study explored the dosimetric difference between hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HFWBI) with sequential boost (SEB) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) based on supine and prone positions to identify the superior boost mode and superior position. Thirty breast cancer patients eligible for HFWBI after breast-conserving surgery were enrolled. All patients underwent 3DCT simulation scanning in both supine and prone positions. For the SEB-HFWBI plan, the dose prescribed for the planning target volume (PTV) of whole breast (WB) was 2.67 Gy per fraction with a total of 15 fractions, followed by a sequential boost of 3.2 Gy per fraction to the PTV of tumor bed (TB) in 3 fractions. For the SIB-HFWBI plan, the dose prescribed for the PTV of WB was 2.67 Gy per fraction with a total of 15 fractions, with a simultaneously integrated boost of 3.2 Gy per fraction to the PTV of TB with a total of 15 fractions. Regardless of the position, for the PTV of TB, the conformal index (CI) in the SIB-HFWBI plans was greater than those in the SEB-HFWBI plans (T = − 8.114, − 8.114; both P < 0.05). The CI for the PTV of WB increased significantly in the prone position relative to the supine position in both two plans(Z = − 3.340, − 3.501; all P < 0.05). The study suggested that prone SIB-HFWBI might be more suitable for postoperative radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer patients.