Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome

Abstract Shotgun metagenomic sequencing is a valuable tool for the taxonomic and functional profiling of microbial communities. However, this approach is challenging in samples, such as milk, where a low microbial abundance, combined with high levels of host DNA, result in inefficient and uneconomic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Min Yap, Conor Feehily, Calum J. Walsh, Mark Fenelon, Eileen F. Murphy, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, Douwe van Sinderen, Paul W. O’Toole, Orla O’Sullivan, Paul D. Cotter
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ebd35d15f2fe424d9aae078bc49b7de4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ebd35d15f2fe424d9aae078bc49b7de4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ebd35d15f2fe424d9aae078bc49b7de42021-12-02T11:43:36ZEvaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome10.1038/s41598-020-78773-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/ebd35d15f2fe424d9aae078bc49b7de42020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78773-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Shotgun metagenomic sequencing is a valuable tool for the taxonomic and functional profiling of microbial communities. However, this approach is challenging in samples, such as milk, where a low microbial abundance, combined with high levels of host DNA, result in inefficient and uneconomical sequencing. Here we evaluate approaches to deplete host DNA or enrich microbial DNA prior to sequencing using three commercially available kits. We compared the percentage of microbial reads obtained from each kit after shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Using bovine and human milk samples, we determined that host depletion with the MolYsis complete5 kit significantly improved microbial sequencing depth compared to other approaches tested. Importantly, no biases were introduced. Additionally, the increased microbial sequencing depth allowed for further characterization of the microbiome through the generation of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Furthermore, with the use of a mock community, we compared three common classifiers and determined that Kraken2 was the optimal classifier for these samples. This evaluation shows that microbiome analysis can be performed on both bovine and human milk samples at a much greater resolution without the need for more expensive deep-sequencing approaches.Min YapConor FeehilyCalum J. WalshMark FenelonEileen F. MurphyFionnuala M. McAuliffeDouwe van SinderenPaul W. O’TooleOrla O’SullivanPaul D. CotterNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Min Yap
Conor Feehily
Calum J. Walsh
Mark Fenelon
Eileen F. Murphy
Fionnuala M. McAuliffe
Douwe van Sinderen
Paul W. O’Toole
Orla O’Sullivan
Paul D. Cotter
Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome
description Abstract Shotgun metagenomic sequencing is a valuable tool for the taxonomic and functional profiling of microbial communities. However, this approach is challenging in samples, such as milk, where a low microbial abundance, combined with high levels of host DNA, result in inefficient and uneconomical sequencing. Here we evaluate approaches to deplete host DNA or enrich microbial DNA prior to sequencing using three commercially available kits. We compared the percentage of microbial reads obtained from each kit after shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Using bovine and human milk samples, we determined that host depletion with the MolYsis complete5 kit significantly improved microbial sequencing depth compared to other approaches tested. Importantly, no biases were introduced. Additionally, the increased microbial sequencing depth allowed for further characterization of the microbiome through the generation of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Furthermore, with the use of a mock community, we compared three common classifiers and determined that Kraken2 was the optimal classifier for these samples. This evaluation shows that microbiome analysis can be performed on both bovine and human milk samples at a much greater resolution without the need for more expensive deep-sequencing approaches.
format article
author Min Yap
Conor Feehily
Calum J. Walsh
Mark Fenelon
Eileen F. Murphy
Fionnuala M. McAuliffe
Douwe van Sinderen
Paul W. O’Toole
Orla O’Sullivan
Paul D. Cotter
author_facet Min Yap
Conor Feehily
Calum J. Walsh
Mark Fenelon
Eileen F. Murphy
Fionnuala M. McAuliffe
Douwe van Sinderen
Paul W. O’Toole
Orla O’Sullivan
Paul D. Cotter
author_sort Min Yap
title Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome
title_short Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome
title_full Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome
title_fullStr Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome
title_sort evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/ebd35d15f2fe424d9aae078bc49b7de4
work_keys_str_mv AT minyap evaluationofmethodsforthereductionofcontaminatinghostreadswhenperformingshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofthemilkmicrobiome
AT conorfeehily evaluationofmethodsforthereductionofcontaminatinghostreadswhenperformingshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofthemilkmicrobiome
AT calumjwalsh evaluationofmethodsforthereductionofcontaminatinghostreadswhenperformingshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofthemilkmicrobiome
AT markfenelon evaluationofmethodsforthereductionofcontaminatinghostreadswhenperformingshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofthemilkmicrobiome
AT eileenfmurphy evaluationofmethodsforthereductionofcontaminatinghostreadswhenperformingshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofthemilkmicrobiome
AT fionnualammcauliffe evaluationofmethodsforthereductionofcontaminatinghostreadswhenperformingshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofthemilkmicrobiome
AT douwevansinderen evaluationofmethodsforthereductionofcontaminatinghostreadswhenperformingshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofthemilkmicrobiome
AT paulwotoole evaluationofmethodsforthereductionofcontaminatinghostreadswhenperformingshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofthemilkmicrobiome
AT orlaosullivan evaluationofmethodsforthereductionofcontaminatinghostreadswhenperformingshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofthemilkmicrobiome
AT pauldcotter evaluationofmethodsforthereductionofcontaminatinghostreadswhenperformingshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofthemilkmicrobiome
_version_ 1718395375523463168