Kontestacja wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony w Parlamencie Europejskim na przykładzie działań UE w Afganistanie w latach 2005-2013

Contestation of the common foreign and security policy in European Parliament. The case of EU actions in Afghanistan in 2005‑2013 Foreign policy, including the security policy, has traditionally been considered a domain of the public policy, where lower standards of parliamentary democratic contr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Marcin Zubek
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
PL
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:
Law
K
J
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ebeb5f5e4f124bbfb9732bea19b7ac6a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ebeb5f5e4f124bbfb9732bea19b7ac6a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ebeb5f5e4f124bbfb9732bea19b7ac6a2021-11-27T13:06:43ZKontestacja wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony w Parlamencie Europejskim na przykładzie działań UE w Afganistanie w latach 2005-201310.12797/Politeja.14.2017.49.131733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/ebeb5f5e4f124bbfb9732bea19b7ac6a2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/1644https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 Contestation of the common foreign and security policy in European Parliament. The case of EU actions in Afghanistan in 2005‑2013 Foreign policy, including the security policy, has traditionally been considered a domain of the public policy, where lower standards of parliamentary democratic control and scrutiny can be employed. There is a belief among the policy‑makers, that in order to act effectively in this field, they should not be limited by the legislative power. This democratic deficit is even amplified on the international level, whenever an international organization is involved in implementing security policy. In spite of that fact, parliaments still retained the right to scrutinize security policies via debates, which reveal MPs approach towards state’s security policy. The main aim of this article is to analyze a case of democratic control over security policy on the international level, namely the security policy towards Afghanistan between 2005 and 2013 and its contestation in the European Parliament (EP). In order to do so a qualitative analysis of the plenary debates in the EP will be employed, which will reveal arguments used by the MEPs in order to justify certain policies, political claims directed to national and international institutions and contestation of the process of the formulation of the EU policy towards this particular security issue. Marcin ZubekKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleAfghanistanForeign PolicyCommon Security and Defence PolicycontestationEuropean ParliamentLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 14, Iss 4(49) (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
PL
topic Afghanistan
Foreign Policy
Common Security and Defence Policy
contestation
European Parliament
Law
K
Political science
J
spellingShingle Afghanistan
Foreign Policy
Common Security and Defence Policy
contestation
European Parliament
Law
K
Political science
J
Marcin Zubek
Kontestacja wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony w Parlamencie Europejskim na przykładzie działań UE w Afganistanie w latach 2005-2013
description Contestation of the common foreign and security policy in European Parliament. The case of EU actions in Afghanistan in 2005‑2013 Foreign policy, including the security policy, has traditionally been considered a domain of the public policy, where lower standards of parliamentary democratic control and scrutiny can be employed. There is a belief among the policy‑makers, that in order to act effectively in this field, they should not be limited by the legislative power. This democratic deficit is even amplified on the international level, whenever an international organization is involved in implementing security policy. In spite of that fact, parliaments still retained the right to scrutinize security policies via debates, which reveal MPs approach towards state’s security policy. The main aim of this article is to analyze a case of democratic control over security policy on the international level, namely the security policy towards Afghanistan between 2005 and 2013 and its contestation in the European Parliament (EP). In order to do so a qualitative analysis of the plenary debates in the EP will be employed, which will reveal arguments used by the MEPs in order to justify certain policies, political claims directed to national and international institutions and contestation of the process of the formulation of the EU policy towards this particular security issue.
format article
author Marcin Zubek
author_facet Marcin Zubek
author_sort Marcin Zubek
title Kontestacja wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony w Parlamencie Europejskim na przykładzie działań UE w Afganistanie w latach 2005-2013
title_short Kontestacja wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony w Parlamencie Europejskim na przykładzie działań UE w Afganistanie w latach 2005-2013
title_full Kontestacja wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony w Parlamencie Europejskim na przykładzie działań UE w Afganistanie w latach 2005-2013
title_fullStr Kontestacja wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony w Parlamencie Europejskim na przykładzie działań UE w Afganistanie w latach 2005-2013
title_full_unstemmed Kontestacja wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony w Parlamencie Europejskim na przykładzie działań UE w Afganistanie w latach 2005-2013
title_sort kontestacja wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony w parlamencie europejskim na przykładzie działań ue w afganistanie w latach 2005-2013
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ebeb5f5e4f124bbfb9732bea19b7ac6a
work_keys_str_mv AT marcinzubek kontestacjawspolnejpolitykibezpieczenstwaiobronywparlamencieeuropejskimnaprzykładziedziałanuewafganistaniewlatach20052013
_version_ 1718408777403727872