CRITICAL ASPECTS, MOTIVATORS AND BARRIERS OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED VEGETATION

Purpose Green buildings which provide improved user health conditions and environmentally responsible applications have gained significant attention, due to the increasing environmental problems, particularly caused by the construction industry at the global scale. However, vegetation is still not...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Monder Almuder, Ozge Suzer
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design 2020
Materias:	Building-Integrated Vegetation Green Roofs Green Walls Interior Gardens Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ec08e3d1529341559194d430050617d8
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ec08e3d1529341559194d430050617d8
record_format	dspace
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Building-Integrated Vegetation Green Roofs Green Walls Interior Gardens Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9
spellingShingle	Building-Integrated Vegetation Green Roofs Green Walls Interior Gardens Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9 Monder Almuder Ozge Suzer CRITICAL ASPECTS, MOTIVATORS AND BARRIERS OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED VEGETATION
description	Purpose Green buildings which provide improved user health conditions and environmentally responsible applications have gained significant attention, due to the increasing environmental problems, particularly caused by the construction industry at the global scale. However, vegetation is still not sufficiently integrated into buildings, even though numerous benefits of plants have been proven by many studies in literature. This research aims to find out the opinions of professionals and academicians in architecture-related fields regarding the critical aspects, as well as the motivators and barriers faced in BIV applications, namely; green roofs, green walls and interior gardens. Hence, it strives to help increase their application rates by underlining the significant issues to be considered. Design/methodology/approach As to fulfilling these objectives, a questionnaire survey was conducted on 120 participants with varying professions including architects, landscape designers and civil engineers, from four countries. Findings The results of this study pointed out that, healthcare buildings were given the first priority among the building types for applying BIV. Moreover, among the motivator factors, receiving a certificate was found as an important incentive, besides the environmental, social and economic benefits of BIV. Furthermore, although the highly rated barriers were found as ‘the lack of proper regulations’ and ‘lack of demand by the user/client’, the findings showed that the highest responsibility for the implementation of these applications was placed on the architect. Research Limitations/Implications Based on the five major groups of Köppen climate classification system, the case countries were selected as one from each of the four main types, and by neglecting only Polar, as it lacks settlements. By considering diverse levels of development and economic welfare, countries were selected as; Canada (Snow: Humid-Subarctic), Libya (Dry: Desert-arid), Malaysia (Tropical: Tropical-Rain forest) and Turkey (Mild temperate: Mediterranean). Since the study covered four different countries, the survey was conducted by the use of Google Forms software program. This tool enabled the production and distribution of questionnaires, as well as the collection of data based on the responses of the participants. Furthermore, in order to provide consistency among the questionnaires applied in different countries, the survey was conducted in English language, although it was not the native language for a majority of the participants. Moreover, based on studies claiming that participants are more inclined to select the option with the mid-value in a Likert scale, which implies a neutral position, in the questionnaire, these types of questions were constructed with the forced choice method, by keeping the scales with even number of options. Practical Implications It is expected that the results of this study would be beneficial to both the academicians and professionals involved in the green building industry, as well as to the governmental and/or green building authorities. It is expected that this study will help serve as a guide for the stakeholders to increase the application rates of BIV in the construction industry. Social Implications The results of this study were also evaluated based on the findings of four case countries and certain conclusions were derived as to their underlying socio-economic and geographical reasons. Originality/value - Although studies on similar subjects have appeared in the literature, there are none which solely focuses on BIV applications by conducting a survey on the mentioned four case countries and compares its findings with the literature and presents an in-depth analysis on the issue.
format	article
author	Monder Almuder Ozge Suzer
author_facet	Monder Almuder Ozge Suzer
author_sort	Monder Almuder
title	CRITICAL ASPECTS, MOTIVATORS AND BARRIERS OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED VEGETATION
title_short	CRITICAL ASPECTS, MOTIVATORS AND BARRIERS OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED VEGETATION
title_full	CRITICAL ASPECTS, MOTIVATORS AND BARRIERS OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED VEGETATION
title_fullStr	CRITICAL ASPECTS, MOTIVATORS AND BARRIERS OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED VEGETATION
title_full_unstemmed	CRITICAL ASPECTS, MOTIVATORS AND BARRIERS OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED VEGETATION
title_sort	critical aspects, motivators and barriers of building-integrated vegetation
publisher	Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/ec08e3d1529341559194d430050617d8
work_keys_str_mv	AT monderalmuder criticalaspectsmotivatorsandbarriersofbuildingintegratedvegetation AT ozgesuzer criticalaspectsmotivatorsandbarriersofbuildingintegratedvegetation
_version_	1718443646683971584
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ec08e3d1529341559194d430050617d82021-11-07T06:22:15ZCRITICAL ASPECTS, MOTIVATORS AND BARRIERS OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED VEGETATION10.15320/ICONARP.2020.1072147-9380https://doaj.org/article/ec08e3d1529341559194d430050617d82020-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/316https://doaj.org/toc/2147-9380 Purpose Green buildings which provide improved user health conditions and environmentally responsible applications have gained significant attention, due to the increasing environmental problems, particularly caused by the construction industry at the global scale. However, vegetation is still not sufficiently integrated into buildings, even though numerous benefits of plants have been proven by many studies in literature. This research aims to find out the opinions of professionals and academicians in architecture-related fields regarding the critical aspects, as well as the motivators and barriers faced in BIV applications, namely; green roofs, green walls and interior gardens. Hence, it strives to help increase their application rates by underlining the significant issues to be considered. Design/methodology/approach As to fulfilling these objectives, a questionnaire survey was conducted on 120 participants with varying professions including architects, landscape designers and civil engineers, from four countries. Findings The results of this study pointed out that, healthcare buildings were given the first priority among the building types for applying BIV. Moreover, among the motivator factors, receiving a certificate was found as an important incentive, besides the environmental, social and economic benefits of BIV. Furthermore, although the highly rated barriers were found as ‘the lack of proper regulations’ and ‘lack of demand by the user/client’, the findings showed that the highest responsibility for the implementation of these applications was placed on the architect. Research Limitations/Implications Based on the five major groups of Köppen climate classification system, the case countries were selected as one from each of the four main types, and by neglecting only Polar, as it lacks settlements. By considering diverse levels of development and economic welfare, countries were selected as; Canada (Snow: Humid-Subarctic), Libya (Dry: Desert-arid), Malaysia (Tropical: Tropical-Rain forest) and Turkey (Mild temperate: Mediterranean). Since the study covered four different countries, the survey was conducted by the use of Google Forms software program. This tool enabled the production and distribution of questionnaires, as well as the collection of data based on the responses of the participants. Furthermore, in order to provide consistency among the questionnaires applied in different countries, the survey was conducted in English language, although it was not the native language for a majority of the participants. Moreover, based on studies claiming that participants are more inclined to select the option with the mid-value in a Likert scale, which implies a neutral position, in the questionnaire, these types of questions were constructed with the forced choice method, by keeping the scales with even number of options. Practical Implications It is expected that the results of this study would be beneficial to both the academicians and professionals involved in the green building industry, as well as to the governmental and/or green building authorities. It is expected that this study will help serve as a guide for the stakeholders to increase the application rates of BIV in the construction industry. Social Implications The results of this study were also evaluated based on the findings of four case countries and certain conclusions were derived as to their underlying socio-economic and geographical reasons. Originality/value - Although studies on similar subjects have appeared in the literature, there are none which solely focuses on BIV applications by conducting a survey on the mentioned four case countries and compares its findings with the literature and presents an in-depth analysis on the issue. Monder AlmuderOzge SuzerKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and DesignarticleBuilding-Integrated VegetationGreen RoofsGreen WallsInterior GardensArchitectureNA1-9428City planningHT165.5-169.9ENIconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning, Vol 8, Iss 1 (2020)

CRITICAL ASPECTS, MOTIVATORS AND BARRIERS OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED VEGETATION

Ejemplares similares