TWO PERSPECTIVES ON THE ACT ON MUSEUMS
In the paper the analysis of two newly published commentaries (2021) on the Act on Museums is conducted: the first commentary by A. Barbasiewicz, a lawyer specializing in cultural heritage, and the other by a team of scholars: Z. Cieślik, I. Gredka-Ligarska, P. Gwoździewicz- -Matan, I. Lipowicz, A....
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | DE EN PL |
| Publicado: |
Index Copernicus International S.A.
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ec159026a17041a3b3ed55cca81a468a |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | In the paper the analysis of two newly published
commentaries (2021) on the Act on Museums is conducted:
the first commentary by A. Barbasiewicz, a lawyer
specializing in cultural heritage, and the other by a team
of scholars: Z. Cieślik, I. Gredka-Ligarska, P. Gwoździewicz-
-Matan, I. Lipowicz, A. Matan, K. Zeidler specializing
in administrative proceedings and legal protection of
historic monuments. Both publications represent various
perspectives on the same issue, thus complementing one
another. The difference in the approach makes them both
useful to experienced practitioners on the one hand and
those who happen to confront these topics for the first time
one the other. Importantly, both have been written in a clear
language comprehensible to non-lawyers. Their high-rating
cannot be diminished by the few critical remarks formulated
in the paper.
|
|---|