RELENDO RAWLS APÓS PIKETTY: justiça, desigualdade e democracia de cidadãos proprietários

When discussing the type of institutional regime most prone to realizing the principles of justice as fairness, Rawls (2001) presents three arguments about the superiority of a property-owning democracy over welfare-state capitalism, concerning, respectively, the fair value of political liberties, f...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Leandro Martins Zanitelli
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ES FR PT
Publicado:	Universidade Federal do Maranhão 2015
Materias:	property owning democracy welfare state capitalism inequality rawls piketty Political science J Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/eccb9e7a66d5431cbd09f29a148901ba
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:eccb9e7a66d5431cbd09f29a148901ba
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:eccb9e7a66d5431cbd09f29a148901ba2021-11-11T15:50:45ZRELENDO RAWLS APÓS PIKETTY: justiça, desigualdade e democracia de cidadãos proprietários2178-2865https://doaj.org/article/eccb9e7a66d5431cbd09f29a148901ba2015-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=321143695013https://doaj.org/toc/2178-2865When discussing the type of institutional regime most prone to realizing the principles of justice as fairness, Rawls (2001) presents three arguments about the superiority of a property-owning democracy over welfare-state capitalism, concerning, respectively, the fair value of political liberties, fair equality of opportunity and the difference principle. In a critique of those arguments, O’Neill (2012) states that only the last one, the argument of the difference principle, is convincing. This paper, tries to demonstrate how Piketty’s (2014) recent analysis of the tendency of increasing inequality in low-growth societies offers support to Rawls’s arguments favoring property-owning democracy in matters regarding the fair value of political liberties and fair equality of opportunity. Piketty’s work also stresses the importance, in what refers to the difference principle, of distinguishing between a regime encompassing policies to prevent the wealth concentration (property-owning democracy) and another one whose exclusive concern is to reduce income inequality (welfare-state capitalism).Leandro Martins ZanitelliUniversidade Federal do Maranhãoarticlepropertyowning democracywelfarestate capitalisminequalityrawlspikettyPolitical scienceJPolitical institutions and public administration (General)JF20-2112ENESFRPTRevista de Políticas Públicas, Vol 19, Iss 2, Pp 509-520 (2015)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ES FR PT
topic	property owning democracy welfare state capitalism inequality rawls piketty Political science J Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112
spellingShingle	property owning democracy welfare state capitalism inequality rawls piketty Political science J Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Leandro Martins Zanitelli RELENDO RAWLS APÓS PIKETTY: justiça, desigualdade e democracia de cidadãos proprietários
description	When discussing the type of institutional regime most prone to realizing the principles of justice as fairness, Rawls (2001) presents three arguments about the superiority of a property-owning democracy over welfare-state capitalism, concerning, respectively, the fair value of political liberties, fair equality of opportunity and the difference principle. In a critique of those arguments, O’Neill (2012) states that only the last one, the argument of the difference principle, is convincing. This paper, tries to demonstrate how Piketty’s (2014) recent analysis of the tendency of increasing inequality in low-growth societies offers support to Rawls’s arguments favoring property-owning democracy in matters regarding the fair value of political liberties and fair equality of opportunity. Piketty’s work also stresses the importance, in what refers to the difference principle, of distinguishing between a regime encompassing policies to prevent the wealth concentration (property-owning democracy) and another one whose exclusive concern is to reduce income inequality (welfare-state capitalism).
format	article
author	Leandro Martins Zanitelli
author_facet	Leandro Martins Zanitelli
author_sort	Leandro Martins Zanitelli
title	RELENDO RAWLS APÓS PIKETTY: justiça, desigualdade e democracia de cidadãos proprietários
title_short	RELENDO RAWLS APÓS PIKETTY: justiça, desigualdade e democracia de cidadãos proprietários
title_full	RELENDO RAWLS APÓS PIKETTY: justiça, desigualdade e democracia de cidadãos proprietários
title_fullStr	RELENDO RAWLS APÓS PIKETTY: justiça, desigualdade e democracia de cidadãos proprietários
title_full_unstemmed	RELENDO RAWLS APÓS PIKETTY: justiça, desigualdade e democracia de cidadãos proprietários
title_sort	relendo rawls após piketty: justiça, desigualdade e democracia de cidadãos proprietários
publisher	Universidade Federal do Maranhão
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/eccb9e7a66d5431cbd09f29a148901ba
work_keys_str_mv	AT leandromartinszanitelli relendorawlsapospikettyjusticadesigualdadeedemocraciadecidadaosproprietarios
_version_	1718433480944123904

RELENDO RAWLS APÓS PIKETTY: justiça, desigualdade e democracia de cidadãos proprietários

Ejemplares similares