On the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs

This paper investigates the prepositional nature of non-finite verbal forms. Assuming well-known observations that relate the categories P and V on the one hand (see Chomsky 1970, 1981, Demirdache & Uribe-Etxebarria 2000, Hale & Keyser 2002, and Svenonius 2003, 2007, 2008, among others), and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ángel J. Gallego
Formato: article
Lenguaje:CA
EN
Publicado: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ecce3001e2d949b9ad708a60c16073a2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ecce3001e2d949b9ad708a60c16073a2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ecce3001e2d949b9ad708a60c16073a22021-11-27T10:47:33ZOn the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs10.5565/rev/catjl.951695-68852014-9719https://doaj.org/article/ecce3001e2d949b9ad708a60c16073a22010-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistes.uab.cat/catJL/article/view/95https://doaj.org/toc/1695-6885https://doaj.org/toc/2014-9719This paper investigates the prepositional nature of non-finite verbal forms. Assuming well-known observations that relate the categories P and V on the one hand (see Chomsky 1970, 1981, Demirdache & Uribe-Etxebarria 2000, Hale & Keyser 2002, and Svenonius 2003, 2007, 2008, among others), and P and C on the other (see den Besten 1983, Emonds 1985, Kayne 2000, and van Riemsdijk 1978) I argue that some non-finite verbs —in particular, past participles and gerunds— incorporate a preposition as a result of the interaction between the categories C and T, which can manifest itself as a species of P in non-finte contexts (see Demirdache & Uribe- Etxebarria 2000, and Pesetsky & Torrego 2004). This approach not only explains different syntactic facts concerning non-finite clauses, but also sheds some light on their interpretive intricacies.Ángel J. GallegoUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaarticlecategoryinfinitivegerundparticipleprepositionAux/T-to-C movementPhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091CAENCatalan Journal of Linguistics, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language CA
EN
topic category
infinitive
gerund
participle
preposition
Aux/T-to-C movement
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
spellingShingle category
infinitive
gerund
participle
preposition
Aux/T-to-C movement
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Ángel J. Gallego
On the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs
description This paper investigates the prepositional nature of non-finite verbal forms. Assuming well-known observations that relate the categories P and V on the one hand (see Chomsky 1970, 1981, Demirdache & Uribe-Etxebarria 2000, Hale & Keyser 2002, and Svenonius 2003, 2007, 2008, among others), and P and C on the other (see den Besten 1983, Emonds 1985, Kayne 2000, and van Riemsdijk 1978) I argue that some non-finite verbs —in particular, past participles and gerunds— incorporate a preposition as a result of the interaction between the categories C and T, which can manifest itself as a species of P in non-finte contexts (see Demirdache & Uribe- Etxebarria 2000, and Pesetsky & Torrego 2004). This approach not only explains different syntactic facts concerning non-finite clauses, but also sheds some light on their interpretive intricacies.
format article
author Ángel J. Gallego
author_facet Ángel J. Gallego
author_sort Ángel J. Gallego
title On the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs
title_short On the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs
title_full On the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs
title_fullStr On the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs
title_full_unstemmed On the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs
title_sort on the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs
publisher Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/ecce3001e2d949b9ad708a60c16073a2
work_keys_str_mv AT angeljgallego ontheprepositionalnatureofnonfiniteverbs
_version_ 1718409082109427712