A daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication, texting, and their interplay on understanding and relationship satisfaction

There is conflicting literature regarding the associations between CMC communication (especially texting) and relationship outcomes in established romantic relationships. These discrepancies could be in part because of differences and imperfections in the methodology of earlier studies, which often...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monique M.H. Pollmann, Tyler J. Norman, Erin E. Crockett
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
CMC
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eccf5ce039a742fb8763f2e6d8711a1b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eccf5ce039a742fb8763f2e6d8711a1b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eccf5ce039a742fb8763f2e6d8711a1b2021-12-01T05:04:00ZA daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication, texting, and their interplay on understanding and relationship satisfaction2451-958810.1016/j.chbr.2021.100088https://doaj.org/article/eccf5ce039a742fb8763f2e6d8711a1b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958821000361https://doaj.org/toc/2451-9588There is conflicting literature regarding the associations between CMC communication (especially texting) and relationship outcomes in established romantic relationships. These discrepancies could be in part because of differences and imperfections in the methodology of earlier studies, which often study CMC in isolation from other forms of communication. To address this gap in the literature, we used a daily-diary study, in which we asked people to report on the time they spent in phone calls, video calls, and texting with their partner, as well as the time they spent face-to-face with their partners. Each day we also asked participants the extent to which they felt understood by their partner and satisfied with their relationships. Results of our multilevel analyses indicated that the more face-to-face communication participants had with their partners, the more understood they felt and the more satisfied they were with their relationship. Texting, by contrast, did not predict relationship satisfaction. Texting was positively associated with understanding, but only when face-to-face communication was relatively low. These findings differ from those found in cross-sectional studies and suggest that texting should be investigated in concert with other forms of communication, especially face-to-face communication.Monique M.H. PollmannTyler J. NormanErin E. CrockettElsevierarticleCMCRelationship satisfactionUnderstandingTextingElectronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95PsychologyBF1-990ENComputers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol 3, Iss , Pp 100088- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic CMC
Relationship satisfaction
Understanding
Texting
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle CMC
Relationship satisfaction
Understanding
Texting
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
Monique M.H. Pollmann
Tyler J. Norman
Erin E. Crockett
A daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication, texting, and their interplay on understanding and relationship satisfaction
description There is conflicting literature regarding the associations between CMC communication (especially texting) and relationship outcomes in established romantic relationships. These discrepancies could be in part because of differences and imperfections in the methodology of earlier studies, which often study CMC in isolation from other forms of communication. To address this gap in the literature, we used a daily-diary study, in which we asked people to report on the time they spent in phone calls, video calls, and texting with their partner, as well as the time they spent face-to-face with their partners. Each day we also asked participants the extent to which they felt understood by their partner and satisfied with their relationships. Results of our multilevel analyses indicated that the more face-to-face communication participants had with their partners, the more understood they felt and the more satisfied they were with their relationship. Texting, by contrast, did not predict relationship satisfaction. Texting was positively associated with understanding, but only when face-to-face communication was relatively low. These findings differ from those found in cross-sectional studies and suggest that texting should be investigated in concert with other forms of communication, especially face-to-face communication.
format article
author Monique M.H. Pollmann
Tyler J. Norman
Erin E. Crockett
author_facet Monique M.H. Pollmann
Tyler J. Norman
Erin E. Crockett
author_sort Monique M.H. Pollmann
title A daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication, texting, and their interplay on understanding and relationship satisfaction
title_short A daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication, texting, and their interplay on understanding and relationship satisfaction
title_full A daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication, texting, and their interplay on understanding and relationship satisfaction
title_fullStr A daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication, texting, and their interplay on understanding and relationship satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed A daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication, texting, and their interplay on understanding and relationship satisfaction
title_sort daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication, texting, and their interplay on understanding and relationship satisfaction
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/eccf5ce039a742fb8763f2e6d8711a1b
work_keys_str_mv AT moniquemhpollmann adailydiarystudyontheeffectsoffacetofacecommunicationtextingandtheirinterplayonunderstandingandrelationshipsatisfaction
AT tylerjnorman adailydiarystudyontheeffectsoffacetofacecommunicationtextingandtheirinterplayonunderstandingandrelationshipsatisfaction
AT erinecrockett adailydiarystudyontheeffectsoffacetofacecommunicationtextingandtheirinterplayonunderstandingandrelationshipsatisfaction
AT moniquemhpollmann dailydiarystudyontheeffectsoffacetofacecommunicationtextingandtheirinterplayonunderstandingandrelationshipsatisfaction
AT tylerjnorman dailydiarystudyontheeffectsoffacetofacecommunicationtextingandtheirinterplayonunderstandingandrelationshipsatisfaction
AT erinecrockett dailydiarystudyontheeffectsoffacetofacecommunicationtextingandtheirinterplayonunderstandingandrelationshipsatisfaction
_version_ 1718405576236466176