Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma

According to Searle (1969) a constitutive rule creates the very possibility of the entity it rules. Later on, other scholars - such as Benoist (2003), Conte (1983), Guastini (1983) - pointed out the inviolability of constitutive rules. In this paper we want to challenge the inviolability dogma by a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Guglielmo Feis, Umberto M. Sconfienza
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR IT
Publicado:	Rosenberg & Sellier 2016
Materias:	constitutive rules inviolability dogma Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ecdac3b1e29d41d1be30909af59a5e29
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ecdac3b1e29d41d1be30909af59a5e29
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ecdac3b1e29d41d1be30909af59a5e292021-12-02T10:23:37ZChallenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma10.13128/Phe_Mi-196122280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/ecdac3b1e29d41d1be30909af59a5e292016-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7094https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 According to Searle (1969) a constitutive rule creates the very possibility of the entity it rules. Later on, other scholars - such as Benoist (2003), Conte (1983), Guastini (1983) - pointed out the inviolability of constitutive rules. In this paper we want to challenge the inviolability dogma by asking the following question: is it possible to have violations of constitutive rules? We will argue that a parametrical approach to constitutive rules can do away with the inviolability dogma. As a result, our approach allows for violations and introduces two different ways of exiting a game (semantic exit vs. practical exit). Guglielmo FeisUmberto M. SconfienzaRosenberg & Sellierarticleconstitutive rulesinviolability dogmaAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 3 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR IT
topic	constitutive rules inviolability dogma Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
spellingShingle	constitutive rules inviolability dogma Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Guglielmo Feis Umberto M. Sconfienza Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma
description	According to Searle (1969) a constitutive rule creates the very possibility of the entity it rules. Later on, other scholars - such as Benoist (2003), Conte (1983), Guastini (1983) - pointed out the inviolability of constitutive rules. In this paper we want to challenge the inviolability dogma by asking the following question: is it possible to have violations of constitutive rules? We will argue that a parametrical approach to constitutive rules can do away with the inviolability dogma. As a result, our approach allows for violations and introduces two different ways of exiting a game (semantic exit vs. practical exit).
format	article
author	Guglielmo Feis Umberto M. Sconfienza
author_facet	Guglielmo Feis Umberto M. Sconfienza
author_sort	Guglielmo Feis
title	Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma
title_short	Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma
title_full	Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma
title_fullStr	Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma
title_full_unstemmed	Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma
title_sort	challenging the constitutive rules inviolability dogma
publisher	Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/ecdac3b1e29d41d1be30909af59a5e29
work_keys_str_mv	AT guglielmofeis challengingtheconstitutiverulesinviolabilitydogma AT umbertomsconfienza challengingtheconstitutiverulesinviolabilitydogma
_version_	1718397328794058752

Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma

Ejemplares similares