Different cranial ontogeny in Europeans and Southern Africans.

Modern human populations differ in developmental processes and in several phenotypic traits. However, the link between ontogenetic variation and human diversification has not been frequently addressed. Here, we analysed craniofacial ontogenies by means of geometric-morphometrics of Europeans and Sou...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marina L Sardi, Fernando V Ramírez Rozzi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eceeb12827194d8e9336bc30664082f5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eceeb12827194d8e9336bc30664082f5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eceeb12827194d8e9336bc30664082f52021-11-18T07:20:30ZDifferent cranial ontogeny in Europeans and Southern Africans.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0035917https://doaj.org/article/eceeb12827194d8e9336bc30664082f52012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22558270/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Modern human populations differ in developmental processes and in several phenotypic traits. However, the link between ontogenetic variation and human diversification has not been frequently addressed. Here, we analysed craniofacial ontogenies by means of geometric-morphometrics of Europeans and Southern Africans, according to dental and chronological ages. Results suggest that different adult cranial morphologies between Southern Africans and Europeans arise by a combination of processes that involve traits modified during the prenatal life and others that diverge during early postnatal ontogeny. Main craniofacial changes indicate that Europeans differ from Southern Africans by increasing facial developmental rates and extending the attainment of adult size and shape. Since other studies have suggested that native subsaharan populations attain adulthood earlier than Europeans, it is probable that facial ontogeny is linked with other developmental mechanisms that control the timing of maturation in other variables. Southern Africans appear as retaining young features in adulthood. Facial ontogeny in Europeans produces taller and narrower noses, which seems as an adaptation to colder environments. The lack of these morphological traits in Neanderthals, who lived in cold environments, seems a paradox, but it is probably the consequence of a warm-adapted faces together with precocious maturation. When modern Homo sapiens migrated into Asia and Europe, colder environments might establish pressures that constrained facial growth and development in order to depart from the warm-adapted morphology. Our results provide some answers about how cranial growth and development occur in two human populations and when developmental shifts take place providing a better adaptation to environmental constraints.Marina L SardiFernando V Ramírez RozziPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 4, p e35917 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Marina L Sardi
Fernando V Ramírez Rozzi
Different cranial ontogeny in Europeans and Southern Africans.
description Modern human populations differ in developmental processes and in several phenotypic traits. However, the link between ontogenetic variation and human diversification has not been frequently addressed. Here, we analysed craniofacial ontogenies by means of geometric-morphometrics of Europeans and Southern Africans, according to dental and chronological ages. Results suggest that different adult cranial morphologies between Southern Africans and Europeans arise by a combination of processes that involve traits modified during the prenatal life and others that diverge during early postnatal ontogeny. Main craniofacial changes indicate that Europeans differ from Southern Africans by increasing facial developmental rates and extending the attainment of adult size and shape. Since other studies have suggested that native subsaharan populations attain adulthood earlier than Europeans, it is probable that facial ontogeny is linked with other developmental mechanisms that control the timing of maturation in other variables. Southern Africans appear as retaining young features in adulthood. Facial ontogeny in Europeans produces taller and narrower noses, which seems as an adaptation to colder environments. The lack of these morphological traits in Neanderthals, who lived in cold environments, seems a paradox, but it is probably the consequence of a warm-adapted faces together with precocious maturation. When modern Homo sapiens migrated into Asia and Europe, colder environments might establish pressures that constrained facial growth and development in order to depart from the warm-adapted morphology. Our results provide some answers about how cranial growth and development occur in two human populations and when developmental shifts take place providing a better adaptation to environmental constraints.
format article
author Marina L Sardi
Fernando V Ramírez Rozzi
author_facet Marina L Sardi
Fernando V Ramírez Rozzi
author_sort Marina L Sardi
title Different cranial ontogeny in Europeans and Southern Africans.
title_short Different cranial ontogeny in Europeans and Southern Africans.
title_full Different cranial ontogeny in Europeans and Southern Africans.
title_fullStr Different cranial ontogeny in Europeans and Southern Africans.
title_full_unstemmed Different cranial ontogeny in Europeans and Southern Africans.
title_sort different cranial ontogeny in europeans and southern africans.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/eceeb12827194d8e9336bc30664082f5
work_keys_str_mv AT marinalsardi differentcranialontogenyineuropeansandsouthernafricans
AT fernandovramirezrozzi differentcranialontogenyineuropeansandsouthernafricans
_version_ 1718423636056997888