Tracking the Resolution of Student Misconceptions about the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology
The goal of our study was to track changes in student understanding of the central dogma of molecular biology before and after taking a genetics course. Concept maps require the ability to synthesize new information into existing knowledge frameworks, and so the hypothesis guiding this study was tha...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ed2c9d062a294c2193049599e95c8124 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:ed2c9d062a294c2193049599e95c8124 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:ed2c9d062a294c2193049599e95c81242021-11-15T15:13:57ZTracking the Resolution of Student Misconceptions about the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.11651935-78851935-7877https://doaj.org/article/ed2c9d062a294c2193049599e95c81242016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1165https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7877https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7885The goal of our study was to track changes in student understanding of the central dogma of molecular biology before and after taking a genetics course. Concept maps require the ability to synthesize new information into existing knowledge frameworks, and so the hypothesis guiding this study was that student performance on concept maps reveals specific central dogma misconceptions gained, lost, and retained by students. Students in a genetics course completed pre- and posttest concept mapping tasks using terms related to the central dogma. Student maps increased in complexity and validity, indicating learning gains in both content and complexity of understanding. Changes in each of the 351 possible connections in the mapping task were tracked for each student. Our students did not retain much about the central dogma from their introductory biology courses, but they did move to more advanced levels of understanding by the end of the genetics course. The information they retained from their introductory courses focused on structural components (e.g., protein is made of amino acids) and not on overall mechanistic components (e.g., DNA comes before RNA, the ribosome makes protein). Students made the greatest gains in connections related to transcription, and they resolved the most prior misconceptions about translation. These concept-mapping tasks revealed that students are able to correct prior misconceptions about the central dogma during an intermediate-level genetics course. From these results, educators can design new classroom interventions to target those aspects of this foundational principle with which students have the most trouble.Amy G. BriggsStephanie K. MorganSeth K. SandersonMolly C. SchultingLaramie J. WiesemanAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Biology (General)QH301-705.5ENJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol 17, Iss 3, Pp 339-350 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 |
spellingShingle |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Amy G. Briggs Stephanie K. Morgan Seth K. Sanderson Molly C. Schulting Laramie J. Wieseman Tracking the Resolution of Student Misconceptions about the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology |
description |
The goal of our study was to track changes in student understanding of the central dogma of molecular biology before and after taking a genetics course. Concept maps require the ability to synthesize new information into existing knowledge frameworks, and so the hypothesis guiding this study was that student performance on concept maps reveals specific central dogma misconceptions gained, lost, and retained by students. Students in a genetics course completed pre- and posttest concept mapping tasks using terms related to the central dogma. Student maps increased in complexity and validity, indicating learning gains in both content and complexity of understanding. Changes in each of the 351 possible connections in the mapping task were tracked for each student. Our students did not retain much about the central dogma from their introductory biology courses, but they did move to more advanced levels of understanding by the end of the genetics course. The information they retained from their introductory courses focused on structural components (e.g., protein is made of amino acids) and not on overall mechanistic components (e.g., DNA comes before RNA, the ribosome makes protein). Students made the greatest gains in connections related to transcription, and they resolved the most prior misconceptions about translation. These concept-mapping tasks revealed that students are able to correct prior misconceptions about the central dogma during an intermediate-level genetics course. From these results, educators can design new classroom interventions to target those aspects of this foundational principle with which students have the most trouble. |
format |
article |
author |
Amy G. Briggs Stephanie K. Morgan Seth K. Sanderson Molly C. Schulting Laramie J. Wieseman |
author_facet |
Amy G. Briggs Stephanie K. Morgan Seth K. Sanderson Molly C. Schulting Laramie J. Wieseman |
author_sort |
Amy G. Briggs |
title |
Tracking the Resolution of Student Misconceptions about the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology |
title_short |
Tracking the Resolution of Student Misconceptions about the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology |
title_full |
Tracking the Resolution of Student Misconceptions about the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology |
title_fullStr |
Tracking the Resolution of Student Misconceptions about the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tracking the Resolution of Student Misconceptions about the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology |
title_sort |
tracking the resolution of student misconceptions about the central dogma of molecular biology |
publisher |
American Society for Microbiology |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/ed2c9d062a294c2193049599e95c8124 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amygbriggs trackingtheresolutionofstudentmisconceptionsaboutthecentraldogmaofmolecularbiology AT stephaniekmorgan trackingtheresolutionofstudentmisconceptionsaboutthecentraldogmaofmolecularbiology AT sethksanderson trackingtheresolutionofstudentmisconceptionsaboutthecentraldogmaofmolecularbiology AT mollycschulting trackingtheresolutionofstudentmisconceptionsaboutthecentraldogmaofmolecularbiology AT laramiejwieseman trackingtheresolutionofstudentmisconceptionsaboutthecentraldogmaofmolecularbiology |
_version_ |
1718428226139717632 |