Experts’ Judgment-Based Mamdani-Type Decision System for Risk Assessment

Mamdani fuzzy inference system has been widely used for potential risk modelling and management. The decision-making is usually provided by multiple experts in the field. The conflicting information in sources from different experts become an open issue and has attracted some researchers to investig...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fatin Amirah Ahmad Shukri, Zaidi Isa
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ed46f6d0af1d4c13be8a19db9a337e61
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ed46f6d0af1d4c13be8a19db9a337e61
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ed46f6d0af1d4c13be8a19db9a337e612021-11-15T01:19:31ZExperts’ Judgment-Based Mamdani-Type Decision System for Risk Assessment1563-514710.1155/2021/6652419https://doaj.org/article/ed46f6d0af1d4c13be8a19db9a337e612021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6652419https://doaj.org/toc/1563-5147Mamdani fuzzy inference system has been widely used for potential risk modelling and management. The decision-making is usually provided by multiple experts in the field. The conflicting information in sources from different experts become an open issue and has attracted some researchers to investigate further. Various risk factors in a project caused difficulties for decision makers to make reliable decisions on the whole project since it involves ambiguities, vagueness, and fuzziness. The introduction of the fuzzy inference system to the evaluation of construction risk is capable in explaining its reasoning process and, hence, overcoming such problems. Risk factors under the project management risk were identified through literature sources and from the opinion of experts. It is found that the likelihood and severity of risk is somehow interlinked with the concept of fuzzy theory. For model input and output linguistics variables, the triangular membership function was selected. The methodology employs a fuzzy aggregation system in which an appropriate control action can be determined by the acquisition of expert judgment. A total of 23 rules with logical OR operator, truncation implication, and Mean of Maxima (MoM) method for defuzzification were used to create an effective fuzzy model intended for making decisions. The framework determines the relationship between input and output parameters in if-then rules or mathematical functions using an effective fuzzy arithmetic operator. The study addresses the principle issues of multiexpert opinions based on Mamdani-type decision system and the illustrative example taken from one of medium-sized project held in Malaysia’s construction industry. By comparing with other experimental results, we verify the rationality and reliability of the proposed method.Fatin Amirah Ahmad ShukriZaidi IsaHindawi LimitedarticleEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MathematicsQA1-939ENMathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Mathematics
QA1-939
spellingShingle Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Mathematics
QA1-939
Fatin Amirah Ahmad Shukri
Zaidi Isa
Experts’ Judgment-Based Mamdani-Type Decision System for Risk Assessment
description Mamdani fuzzy inference system has been widely used for potential risk modelling and management. The decision-making is usually provided by multiple experts in the field. The conflicting information in sources from different experts become an open issue and has attracted some researchers to investigate further. Various risk factors in a project caused difficulties for decision makers to make reliable decisions on the whole project since it involves ambiguities, vagueness, and fuzziness. The introduction of the fuzzy inference system to the evaluation of construction risk is capable in explaining its reasoning process and, hence, overcoming such problems. Risk factors under the project management risk were identified through literature sources and from the opinion of experts. It is found that the likelihood and severity of risk is somehow interlinked with the concept of fuzzy theory. For model input and output linguistics variables, the triangular membership function was selected. The methodology employs a fuzzy aggregation system in which an appropriate control action can be determined by the acquisition of expert judgment. A total of 23 rules with logical OR operator, truncation implication, and Mean of Maxima (MoM) method for defuzzification were used to create an effective fuzzy model intended for making decisions. The framework determines the relationship between input and output parameters in if-then rules or mathematical functions using an effective fuzzy arithmetic operator. The study addresses the principle issues of multiexpert opinions based on Mamdani-type decision system and the illustrative example taken from one of medium-sized project held in Malaysia’s construction industry. By comparing with other experimental results, we verify the rationality and reliability of the proposed method.
format article
author Fatin Amirah Ahmad Shukri
Zaidi Isa
author_facet Fatin Amirah Ahmad Shukri
Zaidi Isa
author_sort Fatin Amirah Ahmad Shukri
title Experts’ Judgment-Based Mamdani-Type Decision System for Risk Assessment
title_short Experts’ Judgment-Based Mamdani-Type Decision System for Risk Assessment
title_full Experts’ Judgment-Based Mamdani-Type Decision System for Risk Assessment
title_fullStr Experts’ Judgment-Based Mamdani-Type Decision System for Risk Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Experts’ Judgment-Based Mamdani-Type Decision System for Risk Assessment
title_sort experts’ judgment-based mamdani-type decision system for risk assessment
publisher Hindawi Limited
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ed46f6d0af1d4c13be8a19db9a337e61
work_keys_str_mv AT fatinamirahahmadshukri expertsjudgmentbasedmamdanitypedecisionsystemforriskassessment
AT zaidiisa expertsjudgmentbasedmamdanitypedecisionsystemforriskassessment
_version_ 1718428957553983488