Does Ontogenesis of Social Ontology Start with Pretence?
Rakoczy and Tomasello follow Searle in claiming that rule games need status function assignment and constitutive rules. But, in the case of pretend play, it is not easy to put together these notions with the natural world knowledge necessary to engage in it. If we consider the pretended scenario as...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR IT |
Publicado: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ed5c78c844e54436ab97f3b9aa63dfe9 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:ed5c78c844e54436ab97f3b9aa63dfe9 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:ed5c78c844e54436ab97f3b9aa63dfe92021-12-02T09:51:19ZDoes Ontogenesis of Social Ontology Start with Pretence?10.13128/Phe_Mi-196142280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/ed5c78c844e54436ab97f3b9aa63dfe92016-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7096https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 Rakoczy and Tomasello follow Searle in claiming that rule games need status function assignment and constitutive rules. But, in the case of pretend play, it is not easy to put together these notions with the natural world knowledge necessary to engage in it. If we consider the pretended scenario as a possible world, metaphysically possible, then, how can we abandon the natural necessity implicit in it? The rules of pretend-inference can have a robustly objective status. On this view pretence stands to pretending as truth stands to belief. Gaetano AlbergoRosenberg & Sellierarticlestatus functionpretenceAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 3 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN FR IT |
topic |
status function pretence Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 |
spellingShingle |
status function pretence Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Gaetano Albergo Does Ontogenesis of Social Ontology Start with Pretence? |
description |
Rakoczy and Tomasello follow Searle in claiming that rule games need status function assignment and constitutive rules. But, in the case of pretend play, it is not easy to put together these notions with the natural world knowledge necessary to engage in it. If we consider the pretended scenario as a possible world, metaphysically possible, then, how can we abandon the natural necessity implicit in it? The rules of pretend-inference can have a robustly objective status. On this view pretence stands to pretending as truth stands to belief.
|
format |
article |
author |
Gaetano Albergo |
author_facet |
Gaetano Albergo |
author_sort |
Gaetano Albergo |
title |
Does Ontogenesis of Social Ontology Start with Pretence? |
title_short |
Does Ontogenesis of Social Ontology Start with Pretence? |
title_full |
Does Ontogenesis of Social Ontology Start with Pretence? |
title_fullStr |
Does Ontogenesis of Social Ontology Start with Pretence? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does Ontogenesis of Social Ontology Start with Pretence? |
title_sort |
does ontogenesis of social ontology start with pretence? |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/ed5c78c844e54436ab97f3b9aa63dfe9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gaetanoalbergo doesontogenesisofsocialontologystartwithpretence |
_version_ |
1718398039937253376 |