The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis

Objective. This meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types. Methods. Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CN...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lele Cong, Hongyan Sun, Miao Hao, Qian Sun, Yang Zheng, Xianling Cong, Rihua Jiang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ed60cfedb3b44879baf26196f8d63cd7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ed60cfedb3b44879baf26196f8d63cd7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ed60cfedb3b44879baf26196f8d63cd72021-11-08T02:35:19ZThe Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis1687-846910.1155/2021/3161714https://doaj.org/article/ed60cfedb3b44879baf26196f8d63cd72021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3161714https://doaj.org/toc/1687-8469Objective. This meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types. Methods. Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), were searched for relevant studies up to August 2021, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between SLNCR1 expression and overall survival (OS). Results. 12 studies with a total of 1155 patients with 9 different types of cancers were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR indicates that high SLNCR1 expression represented poorer prognosis of cancer (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.59–2.80, I2 = 0%, P<0.00001). Additionally, high SLNCR1 expression was correlated with TNM stage (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% CI: 1.08–2.74, I2 = 62%, P=0.02), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (OR:2.42, 95% CI: 1.61–3.64, I2 = 55%, P<0.0001), and distant metastases (DM) (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.50–3.55, I2 = 27%, P=0.0002). However, no evidence was found for a relationship between SLNCR1 expression and clinical features such as tumor size (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 0.93–3.14, I2 = 71%, P=0.09), age (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68–1.08, I2 = 0%, P=0.19), or gender (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.64–1.81, I2 = 55%, P=0.79). Conclusion. Our findings found that high SLNCR1 expression was associated with poor OS, advanced tumor stage, tumor size, LNM, and DM in multiple cancers, indicating that SLNCR1 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for cancer patients in China.Lele CongHongyan SunMiao HaoQian SunYang ZhengXianling CongRihua JiangHindawi LimitedarticleNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENJournal of Oncology, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Lele Cong
Hongyan Sun
Miao Hao
Qian Sun
Yang Zheng
Xianling Cong
Rihua Jiang
The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
description Objective. This meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types. Methods. Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), were searched for relevant studies up to August 2021, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between SLNCR1 expression and overall survival (OS). Results. 12 studies with a total of 1155 patients with 9 different types of cancers were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR indicates that high SLNCR1 expression represented poorer prognosis of cancer (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.59–2.80, I2 = 0%, P<0.00001). Additionally, high SLNCR1 expression was correlated with TNM stage (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% CI: 1.08–2.74, I2 = 62%, P=0.02), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (OR:2.42, 95% CI: 1.61–3.64, I2 = 55%, P<0.0001), and distant metastases (DM) (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.50–3.55, I2 = 27%, P=0.0002). However, no evidence was found for a relationship between SLNCR1 expression and clinical features such as tumor size (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 0.93–3.14, I2 = 71%, P=0.09), age (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68–1.08, I2 = 0%, P=0.19), or gender (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.64–1.81, I2 = 55%, P=0.79). Conclusion. Our findings found that high SLNCR1 expression was associated with poor OS, advanced tumor stage, tumor size, LNM, and DM in multiple cancers, indicating that SLNCR1 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for cancer patients in China.
format article
author Lele Cong
Hongyan Sun
Miao Hao
Qian Sun
Yang Zheng
Xianling Cong
Rihua Jiang
author_facet Lele Cong
Hongyan Sun
Miao Hao
Qian Sun
Yang Zheng
Xianling Cong
Rihua Jiang
author_sort Lele Cong
title The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_short The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_full The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort prognostic value of lncrna slncr1 in cancers: a meta-analysis
publisher Hindawi Limited
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ed60cfedb3b44879baf26196f8d63cd7
work_keys_str_mv AT lelecong theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT hongyansun theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT miaohao theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT qiansun theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT yangzheng theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT xianlingcong theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT rihuajiang theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT lelecong prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT hongyansun prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT miaohao prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT qiansun prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT yangzheng prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT xianlingcong prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT rihuajiang prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
_version_ 1718443243220238336