Status of the Recovery Mandate Under Section 7(a)(1) of the U.S. Endangered Species Act

The U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) is widely considered to be one of the strongest laws for protecting imperiled wildlife, with nearly all species protected under the law still existing today. Among the ESA's strongest provisions, at least as written, is the requirement under section 7(a)(1)...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Megan Evansen, Heather Harl, Andrew Carter, Jacob Malcom
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ed63f289bcc4416f821f111d5e0f094e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ed63f289bcc4416f821f111d5e0f094e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ed63f289bcc4416f821f111d5e0f094e2021-11-12T04:38:36ZStatus of the Recovery Mandate Under Section 7(a)(1) of the U.S. Endangered Species Act2673-611X10.3389/fcosc.2021.768628https://doaj.org/article/ed63f289bcc4416f821f111d5e0f094e2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcosc.2021.768628/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2673-611XThe U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) is widely considered to be one of the strongest laws for protecting imperiled wildlife, with nearly all species protected under the law still existing today. Among the ESA's strongest provisions, at least as written, is the requirement under section 7(a)(1) that federal agencies use their authorities to help recover imperiled species. New initiatives like 30 x 30, the campaign to conserve at least 30% of U.S. lands and waters by 2030, offer opportunities to reinvigorate and expand 7(a)(1) programs to play a significant role in biodiversity conservation. To gauge the current status of 7(a)(1) plans and assess their effectiveness, we collected all section 7(a)(1) materials available to the public through internet searches and direct requests to agencies. We evaluated the scope of existing 7(a)(1) programs and found that despite the clear potential benefits of strong programs, the section has been significantly underused by federal agencies. Further, we show that existing plans are highly inconsistent in content and style, and we trace that inconsistency to the lack of policy guidance for their creation and implementation. Based on these findings, we recommend five strategies for improving 7(a)(1) implementation: establishment of formal guidance from the federal wildlife agencies, tailored guidance from other federal agencies to help them meet their 7(a)(1) obligation, dedicated funding, integration of 7(a)(1) into existing initiatives and opportunities, and top-level executive branch coordination and cooperation.Megan EvansenHeather HarlAndrew CarterAndrew CarterJacob MalcomJacob MalcomFrontiers Media S.A.articleEndangered Species Act (ESA)environmental policysection 7(a)(1)section 7(a)(2)conservationendangered speciesGeneral. Including nature conservation, geographical distributionQH1-199.5ENFrontiers in Conservation Science, Vol 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Endangered Species Act (ESA)
environmental policy
section 7(a)(1)
section 7(a)(2)
conservation
endangered species
General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
spellingShingle Endangered Species Act (ESA)
environmental policy
section 7(a)(1)
section 7(a)(2)
conservation
endangered species
General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
Megan Evansen
Heather Harl
Andrew Carter
Andrew Carter
Jacob Malcom
Jacob Malcom
Status of the Recovery Mandate Under Section 7(a)(1) of the U.S. Endangered Species Act
description The U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) is widely considered to be one of the strongest laws for protecting imperiled wildlife, with nearly all species protected under the law still existing today. Among the ESA's strongest provisions, at least as written, is the requirement under section 7(a)(1) that federal agencies use their authorities to help recover imperiled species. New initiatives like 30 x 30, the campaign to conserve at least 30% of U.S. lands and waters by 2030, offer opportunities to reinvigorate and expand 7(a)(1) programs to play a significant role in biodiversity conservation. To gauge the current status of 7(a)(1) plans and assess their effectiveness, we collected all section 7(a)(1) materials available to the public through internet searches and direct requests to agencies. We evaluated the scope of existing 7(a)(1) programs and found that despite the clear potential benefits of strong programs, the section has been significantly underused by federal agencies. Further, we show that existing plans are highly inconsistent in content and style, and we trace that inconsistency to the lack of policy guidance for their creation and implementation. Based on these findings, we recommend five strategies for improving 7(a)(1) implementation: establishment of formal guidance from the federal wildlife agencies, tailored guidance from other federal agencies to help them meet their 7(a)(1) obligation, dedicated funding, integration of 7(a)(1) into existing initiatives and opportunities, and top-level executive branch coordination and cooperation.
format article
author Megan Evansen
Heather Harl
Andrew Carter
Andrew Carter
Jacob Malcom
Jacob Malcom
author_facet Megan Evansen
Heather Harl
Andrew Carter
Andrew Carter
Jacob Malcom
Jacob Malcom
author_sort Megan Evansen
title Status of the Recovery Mandate Under Section 7(a)(1) of the U.S. Endangered Species Act
title_short Status of the Recovery Mandate Under Section 7(a)(1) of the U.S. Endangered Species Act
title_full Status of the Recovery Mandate Under Section 7(a)(1) of the U.S. Endangered Species Act
title_fullStr Status of the Recovery Mandate Under Section 7(a)(1) of the U.S. Endangered Species Act
title_full_unstemmed Status of the Recovery Mandate Under Section 7(a)(1) of the U.S. Endangered Species Act
title_sort status of the recovery mandate under section 7(a)(1) of the u.s. endangered species act
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ed63f289bcc4416f821f111d5e0f094e
work_keys_str_mv AT meganevansen statusoftherecoverymandateundersection7a1oftheusendangeredspeciesact
AT heatherharl statusoftherecoverymandateundersection7a1oftheusendangeredspeciesact
AT andrewcarter statusoftherecoverymandateundersection7a1oftheusendangeredspeciesact
AT andrewcarter statusoftherecoverymandateundersection7a1oftheusendangeredspeciesact
AT jacobmalcom statusoftherecoverymandateundersection7a1oftheusendangeredspeciesact
AT jacobmalcom statusoftherecoverymandateundersection7a1oftheusendangeredspeciesact
_version_ 1718431263401967616