Globalization
Globalization is a subject about which it is very easy to write copiously and badly. This is inevitable, given its literal implication of change in everything humanity holds dear, thereby eluding encapsulation within any single paradigm, theory, or perspective. Legions of authors, however, not dete...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
1998
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ed6cb4bf05584a87ae45ca943ac0a120 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Globalization is a subject about which it is very easy to write copiously and badly.
This is inevitable, given its literal implication of change in everything humanity holds
dear, thereby eluding encapsulation within any single paradigm, theory, or perspective.
Legions of authors, however, not deterred by this fact have elaborated on their uniquely
true reading of the outcomes of this phenomenon, so many carefully avoiding serious criticism
of the idea in so doing. Now, as the millenium nears, whole populations are certain
in their knowledge that globalization is here, but very few individuals can claim credibly
to know what it is, how it works, and where it will take us.
One useful approach to doing justice to so broad a topic within a single volume is to
engage the services of several authors, each dealing with those facets of globalization for
which they are best equipped. This is the approach taken in the work under review, where
the talents of 23 individuals have been pooled. The downside is the risk that no tangible
concept of globalization will emerge from the various contributions and that the reader
will be left unconvinced that so many disparate treatments describe the same subject.
Editors Kofman and Youngs exhibit some sensitivity to this problem and, to their
credit, designed their book to encompass a sizable part of the intellectual territory of globalization.
From the vantage points of geography, politics, and international relations, as
well as sociology, law, and even epistemology, each author shares his or her view of globalization
in action. If, at times, the view is from quite a distance or obstructed by foreground
issues of only indirect importance, this is compensated for by the novelty of the
perspectives offered. As far as intellectual coverage is concerned, a stronger economic
content is notable by its absence, for although economists have their say on the subject
nearly everywhere else, the intimacy between politics and economics (as opposed to capitalism)
in the context of globalization deserves every attention.
Kofman and Youngs are anxious to position this work as part of the “second wave”
of serious and scholarly research on globalization, although in so doing they tend to
assume that the “first wave” (presumably consisting of descriptive or historical narratives)
yielded a solid enough foundation on which to build. The fact remains that the
very hypothesis of globalization has its detractors, and in their introduction, the editors
fail to convince the critical reader of globalization’s conceptual or empirical validity.
Similarly, several later chapters could easily be rewritten without recourse to “the G
word,” for they are more useful as perspectives on postlmodernism, capitalism,
interhationalism, internationalization, or regionalism, to name only a representative
selection. Although many participants in academic discourse comprehend globalization
in its particular manifestations, others, myself included, prefer that its elaboration on a
holistic level should be featured just as often. The tendency to work within the “globalization
of ...” framework, rather than “globalization is ...,” eventually may obscure
vital truths of the same variety as a failure to see the forest shrinking due to focused
interest in the growth of individual trees. A book such as this should, by its close, clarify
what globalization is not, in order to demonstrate the theory’s tractability. This
would serve the additional purpose of countering those who write globalization off as
fantasy, or worse, as a conspiracy to revive the fortunes of authors exhausted on other
intellectual fronts. Unfortunately, despite its ostensible commitment to the “is”
approach, a good deal of Globalizution is intent on describing the more readily circumscribed
incidents of an ineffable force ...
|
|---|