Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation

Science-based stakeholder dialogue is a strategy to bring science closer to decision-making with increasing importance for the design of environmental policies. The need for such an approximation has been stressed, but documented implementations are rare. We present our experience of developing a sc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alice Dantas Brites, Kaline de Mello, Paulo André Tavares, Jean Paul Metzger, Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Paulo Guilherme Molin, Luís Fernando Guedes Pinto, Carlos Alfredo Joly, João Francisco Adrien Fernandes, Frederico Soares Machado, Eduardo Trani, Gerd Sparovek
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ed95c36f13754bab9182df788ea0ddae
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ed95c36f13754bab9182df788ea0ddae
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ed95c36f13754bab9182df788ea0ddae2021-11-19T10:59:17ZScience-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation0972-492310.4103/cs.cs_20_134https://doaj.org/article/ed95c36f13754bab9182df788ea0ddae2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2021;volume=19;issue=4;spage=225;epage=235;aulast=Briteshttps://doaj.org/toc/0972-4923Science-based stakeholder dialogue is a strategy to bring science closer to decision-making with increasing importance for the design of environmental policies. The need for such an approximation has been stressed, but documented implementations are rare. We present our experience of developing a science-based dialogue for the Brazilian Forest Code implementation and share the lessons learned. We departed from a mix of participatory methods to conduct six meetings with stakeholders. During the process, we were able to reduce the gap between science and practice, meeting stakeholders' expectations and increasing the accessibility of scientific information. Avoiding falling back to top-down science and keeping stakeholders' participation constancy were challenges faced. Despite the project achievements, important scientific outcomes were disregarded by higher instances of decision-making. Thus, although we were able to start the dialogue successfully, we also come across the fact that external political factors impaired its reach. By reporting our experience, we expect to help to establish science-based dialogues applied to environmental policy implementation, narrowing the science-practice gap and contributing to more effective environmental policies.Alice Dantas BritesKaline de MelloPaulo André TavaresJean Paul MetzgerRicardo Ribeiro RodriguesPaulo Guilherme MolinLuís Fernando Guedes PintoCarlos Alfredo JolyJoão Francisco Adrien FernandesFrederico Soares MachadoEduardo TraniGerd SparovekWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticleenvironmental policybrazildecision-makingscience-practice gapEcologyQH540-549.5ENConservation & Society, Vol 19, Iss 4, Pp 225-235 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic environmental policy
brazil
decision-making
science-practice gap
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle environmental policy
brazil
decision-making
science-practice gap
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Alice Dantas Brites
Kaline de Mello
Paulo André Tavares
Jean Paul Metzger
Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues
Paulo Guilherme Molin
Luís Fernando Guedes Pinto
Carlos Alfredo Joly
João Francisco Adrien Fernandes
Frederico Soares Machado
Eduardo Trani
Gerd Sparovek
Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation
description Science-based stakeholder dialogue is a strategy to bring science closer to decision-making with increasing importance for the design of environmental policies. The need for such an approximation has been stressed, but documented implementations are rare. We present our experience of developing a science-based dialogue for the Brazilian Forest Code implementation and share the lessons learned. We departed from a mix of participatory methods to conduct six meetings with stakeholders. During the process, we were able to reduce the gap between science and practice, meeting stakeholders' expectations and increasing the accessibility of scientific information. Avoiding falling back to top-down science and keeping stakeholders' participation constancy were challenges faced. Despite the project achievements, important scientific outcomes were disregarded by higher instances of decision-making. Thus, although we were able to start the dialogue successfully, we also come across the fact that external political factors impaired its reach. By reporting our experience, we expect to help to establish science-based dialogues applied to environmental policy implementation, narrowing the science-practice gap and contributing to more effective environmental policies.
format article
author Alice Dantas Brites
Kaline de Mello
Paulo André Tavares
Jean Paul Metzger
Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues
Paulo Guilherme Molin
Luís Fernando Guedes Pinto
Carlos Alfredo Joly
João Francisco Adrien Fernandes
Frederico Soares Machado
Eduardo Trani
Gerd Sparovek
author_facet Alice Dantas Brites
Kaline de Mello
Paulo André Tavares
Jean Paul Metzger
Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues
Paulo Guilherme Molin
Luís Fernando Guedes Pinto
Carlos Alfredo Joly
João Francisco Adrien Fernandes
Frederico Soares Machado
Eduardo Trani
Gerd Sparovek
author_sort Alice Dantas Brites
title Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation
title_short Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation
title_full Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation
title_fullStr Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation
title_full_unstemmed Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation
title_sort science-based stakeholder dialogue for environmental policy implementation
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ed95c36f13754bab9182df788ea0ddae
work_keys_str_mv AT alicedantasbrites sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT kalinedemello sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT pauloandretavares sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT jeanpaulmetzger sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT ricardoribeirorodrigues sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT pauloguilhermemolin sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT luisfernandoguedespinto sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT carlosalfredojoly sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT joaofranciscoadrienfernandes sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT fredericosoaresmachado sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT eduardotrani sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
AT gerdsparovek sciencebasedstakeholderdialogueforenvironmentalpolicyimplementation
_version_ 1718420167148437504