The scaling of social interactions across animal species

Abstract Social animals self-organise to create groups to increase protection against predators and productivity. One-to-one interactions are the building blocks of these emergent social structures and may correspond to friendship, grooming, communication, among other social relations. These structu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luis E. C. Rocha, Jan Ryckebusch, Koen Schoors, Matthew Smith
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eddc18ed28e54f8481542168149d6739
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eddc18ed28e54f8481542168149d6739
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eddc18ed28e54f8481542168149d67392021-12-02T16:04:13ZThe scaling of social interactions across animal species10.1038/s41598-021-92025-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/eddc18ed28e54f8481542168149d67392021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92025-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Social animals self-organise to create groups to increase protection against predators and productivity. One-to-one interactions are the building blocks of these emergent social structures and may correspond to friendship, grooming, communication, among other social relations. These structures should be robust to failures and provide efficient communication to compensate the costs of forming and maintaining the social contacts but the specific purpose of each social interaction regulates the evolution of the respective social networks. We collate 611 animal social networks and show that the number of social contacts E scales with group size N as a super-linear power-law $$E=CN^\beta$$ E = C N β for various species of animals, including humans, other mammals and non-mammals. We identify that the power-law exponent $$\beta$$ β varies according to the social function of the interactions as $$\beta = 1+a/4$$ β = 1 + a / 4 , with $$a \approx {1,2,3,4}$$ a ≈ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 . By fitting a multi-layer model to our data, we observe that the cost to cross social groups also varies according to social function. Relatively low costs are observed for physical contact, grooming and group membership which lead to small groups with high and constant social clustering. Offline friendship has similar patterns while online friendship shows weak social structures. The intermediate case of spatial proximity (with  $$\beta =1.5$$ β = 1.5 and clustering dependency on network size quantitatively similar to friendship) suggests that proximity interactions may be as relevant for the spread of infectious diseases as for social processes like friendship.Luis E. C. RochaJan RyckebuschKoen SchoorsMatthew SmithNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Luis E. C. Rocha
Jan Ryckebusch
Koen Schoors
Matthew Smith
The scaling of social interactions across animal species
description Abstract Social animals self-organise to create groups to increase protection against predators and productivity. One-to-one interactions are the building blocks of these emergent social structures and may correspond to friendship, grooming, communication, among other social relations. These structures should be robust to failures and provide efficient communication to compensate the costs of forming and maintaining the social contacts but the specific purpose of each social interaction regulates the evolution of the respective social networks. We collate 611 animal social networks and show that the number of social contacts E scales with group size N as a super-linear power-law $$E=CN^\beta$$ E = C N β for various species of animals, including humans, other mammals and non-mammals. We identify that the power-law exponent $$\beta$$ β varies according to the social function of the interactions as $$\beta = 1+a/4$$ β = 1 + a / 4 , with $$a \approx {1,2,3,4}$$ a ≈ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 . By fitting a multi-layer model to our data, we observe that the cost to cross social groups also varies according to social function. Relatively low costs are observed for physical contact, grooming and group membership which lead to small groups with high and constant social clustering. Offline friendship has similar patterns while online friendship shows weak social structures. The intermediate case of spatial proximity (with  $$\beta =1.5$$ β = 1.5 and clustering dependency on network size quantitatively similar to friendship) suggests that proximity interactions may be as relevant for the spread of infectious diseases as for social processes like friendship.
format article
author Luis E. C. Rocha
Jan Ryckebusch
Koen Schoors
Matthew Smith
author_facet Luis E. C. Rocha
Jan Ryckebusch
Koen Schoors
Matthew Smith
author_sort Luis E. C. Rocha
title The scaling of social interactions across animal species
title_short The scaling of social interactions across animal species
title_full The scaling of social interactions across animal species
title_fullStr The scaling of social interactions across animal species
title_full_unstemmed The scaling of social interactions across animal species
title_sort scaling of social interactions across animal species
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/eddc18ed28e54f8481542168149d6739
work_keys_str_mv AT luisecrocha thescalingofsocialinteractionsacrossanimalspecies
AT janryckebusch thescalingofsocialinteractionsacrossanimalspecies
AT koenschoors thescalingofsocialinteractionsacrossanimalspecies
AT matthewsmith thescalingofsocialinteractionsacrossanimalspecies
AT luisecrocha scalingofsocialinteractionsacrossanimalspecies
AT janryckebusch scalingofsocialinteractionsacrossanimalspecies
AT koenschoors scalingofsocialinteractionsacrossanimalspecies
AT matthewsmith scalingofsocialinteractionsacrossanimalspecies
_version_ 1718385304680792064