Cancer classification using machine learning and HRV analysis: preliminary evidence from a pilot study
Abstract Most cancer patients exhibit autonomic dysfunction with attenuated heart rate variability (HRV) levels compared to healthy controls. This research aimed to create and evaluate a machine learning (ML) model enabling discrimination between cancer patients and healthy controls based on 5-min-E...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/edee2d171ae24450a6c36316b4192424 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:edee2d171ae24450a6c36316b4192424 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:edee2d171ae24450a6c36316b41924242021-11-21T12:25:03ZCancer classification using machine learning and HRV analysis: preliminary evidence from a pilot study10.1038/s41598-021-01779-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/edee2d171ae24450a6c36316b41924242021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01779-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Most cancer patients exhibit autonomic dysfunction with attenuated heart rate variability (HRV) levels compared to healthy controls. This research aimed to create and evaluate a machine learning (ML) model enabling discrimination between cancer patients and healthy controls based on 5-min-ECG recordings. We selected 12 HRV features based on previous research and compared the results between cancer patients and healthy individuals using Wilcoxon sum-rank test. Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) identified the top five features, averaged over 5 min and employed them as input to three different ML. Next, we created an ensemble model based on a stacking method that aggregated the predictions from all three base classifiers. All HRV features were significantly different between the two groups. SDNN, RMSSD, pNN50%, HRV triangular index, and SD1 were selected by RFE and used as an input to three different ML. All three base-classifiers performed above chance level, RF being the most efficient with a testing accuracy of 83%. The ensemble model showed a classification accuracy of 86% and an AUC of 0.95. The results obtained by ML algorithms suggest HRV parameters could be a reliable input for differentiating between cancer patients and healthy controls. Results should be interpreted in light of some limitations that call for replication studies with larger sample sizes.Marta VigierBenjamin VigierElisabeth AndritschAndreas R. SchwerdtfegerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Marta Vigier Benjamin Vigier Elisabeth Andritsch Andreas R. Schwerdtfeger Cancer classification using machine learning and HRV analysis: preliminary evidence from a pilot study |
description |
Abstract Most cancer patients exhibit autonomic dysfunction with attenuated heart rate variability (HRV) levels compared to healthy controls. This research aimed to create and evaluate a machine learning (ML) model enabling discrimination between cancer patients and healthy controls based on 5-min-ECG recordings. We selected 12 HRV features based on previous research and compared the results between cancer patients and healthy individuals using Wilcoxon sum-rank test. Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) identified the top five features, averaged over 5 min and employed them as input to three different ML. Next, we created an ensemble model based on a stacking method that aggregated the predictions from all three base classifiers. All HRV features were significantly different between the two groups. SDNN, RMSSD, pNN50%, HRV triangular index, and SD1 were selected by RFE and used as an input to three different ML. All three base-classifiers performed above chance level, RF being the most efficient with a testing accuracy of 83%. The ensemble model showed a classification accuracy of 86% and an AUC of 0.95. The results obtained by ML algorithms suggest HRV parameters could be a reliable input for differentiating between cancer patients and healthy controls. Results should be interpreted in light of some limitations that call for replication studies with larger sample sizes. |
format |
article |
author |
Marta Vigier Benjamin Vigier Elisabeth Andritsch Andreas R. Schwerdtfeger |
author_facet |
Marta Vigier Benjamin Vigier Elisabeth Andritsch Andreas R. Schwerdtfeger |
author_sort |
Marta Vigier |
title |
Cancer classification using machine learning and HRV analysis: preliminary evidence from a pilot study |
title_short |
Cancer classification using machine learning and HRV analysis: preliminary evidence from a pilot study |
title_full |
Cancer classification using machine learning and HRV analysis: preliminary evidence from a pilot study |
title_fullStr |
Cancer classification using machine learning and HRV analysis: preliminary evidence from a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cancer classification using machine learning and HRV analysis: preliminary evidence from a pilot study |
title_sort |
cancer classification using machine learning and hrv analysis: preliminary evidence from a pilot study |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/edee2d171ae24450a6c36316b4192424 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT martavigier cancerclassificationusingmachinelearningandhrvanalysispreliminaryevidencefromapilotstudy AT benjaminvigier cancerclassificationusingmachinelearningandhrvanalysispreliminaryevidencefromapilotstudy AT elisabethandritsch cancerclassificationusingmachinelearningandhrvanalysispreliminaryevidencefromapilotstudy AT andreasrschwerdtfeger cancerclassificationusingmachinelearningandhrvanalysispreliminaryevidencefromapilotstudy |
_version_ |
1718419039810748416 |