The efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria

Abstract Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are used as a probiotic alternative to antibiotics in livestock production. Microencapsulation technology is widely used for probiotic preservation. A variety of microencapsulation protocols have been proposed and compared based on chemicals and mechanical procedu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pawiya Pupa, Prasert Apiwatsiri, Wandee Sirichokchatchawan, Nopadon Pirarat, Nongnuj Muangsin, Asad Ali Shah, Nuvee Prapasarakul
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/edf28a4c595541b6a2ff769d46408ed6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:edf28a4c595541b6a2ff769d46408ed6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:edf28a4c595541b6a2ff769d46408ed62021-12-02T18:18:32ZThe efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria10.1038/s41598-021-93263-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/edf28a4c595541b6a2ff769d46408ed62021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93263-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are used as a probiotic alternative to antibiotics in livestock production. Microencapsulation technology is widely used for probiotic preservation. A variety of microencapsulation protocols have been proposed and compared based on chemicals and mechanical procedures. This study aimed to develop a double-encapsulated coating from alginate (1.5%) and chitosan (0.5%) by extrusion, emulsion, and spray drying methods using the LAB strains Lactobacillus plantarum strains 31F, 25F, 22F, Pediococcus pentosaceus 77F, and P. acidilactici 72N, and to monitor the basic probiotic properties of the encapsulated prototypes. The final products from each microencapsulation protocol were analysed for their appearance, probiotic properties and viable cell count. Using the spray drying method, particles smaller than 15 μm in diameter with a regular spherical shape were obtained, whereas the other methods produced larger (1.4–52 mm) and irregularly shaped microcapsules. After storage for 6 months at room temperature, the LAB viability of the spray-dried particles was the highest among the three methods. In all the LAB strains examined, the encapsulated LAB retained their probiotic properties in relation to acid-bile tolerance and antibacterial activity. This study highlights the efficacy of double-coating microencapsulation for preserving LAB properties and survival rate, and demonstrates its potential for probiotic application in livestock farms.Pawiya PupaPrasert ApiwatsiriWandee SirichokchatchawanNopadon PiraratNongnuj MuangsinAsad Ali ShahNuvee PrapasarakulNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Pawiya Pupa
Prasert Apiwatsiri
Wandee Sirichokchatchawan
Nopadon Pirarat
Nongnuj Muangsin
Asad Ali Shah
Nuvee Prapasarakul
The efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria
description Abstract Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are used as a probiotic alternative to antibiotics in livestock production. Microencapsulation technology is widely used for probiotic preservation. A variety of microencapsulation protocols have been proposed and compared based on chemicals and mechanical procedures. This study aimed to develop a double-encapsulated coating from alginate (1.5%) and chitosan (0.5%) by extrusion, emulsion, and spray drying methods using the LAB strains Lactobacillus plantarum strains 31F, 25F, 22F, Pediococcus pentosaceus 77F, and P. acidilactici 72N, and to monitor the basic probiotic properties of the encapsulated prototypes. The final products from each microencapsulation protocol were analysed for their appearance, probiotic properties and viable cell count. Using the spray drying method, particles smaller than 15 μm in diameter with a regular spherical shape were obtained, whereas the other methods produced larger (1.4–52 mm) and irregularly shaped microcapsules. After storage for 6 months at room temperature, the LAB viability of the spray-dried particles was the highest among the three methods. In all the LAB strains examined, the encapsulated LAB retained their probiotic properties in relation to acid-bile tolerance and antibacterial activity. This study highlights the efficacy of double-coating microencapsulation for preserving LAB properties and survival rate, and demonstrates its potential for probiotic application in livestock farms.
format article
author Pawiya Pupa
Prasert Apiwatsiri
Wandee Sirichokchatchawan
Nopadon Pirarat
Nongnuj Muangsin
Asad Ali Shah
Nuvee Prapasarakul
author_facet Pawiya Pupa
Prasert Apiwatsiri
Wandee Sirichokchatchawan
Nopadon Pirarat
Nongnuj Muangsin
Asad Ali Shah
Nuvee Prapasarakul
author_sort Pawiya Pupa
title The efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria
title_short The efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria
title_full The efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria
title_fullStr The efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria
title_sort efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/edf28a4c595541b6a2ff769d46408ed6
work_keys_str_mv AT pawiyapupa theefficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT prasertapiwatsiri theefficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT wandeesirichokchatchawan theefficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT nopadonpirarat theefficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT nongnujmuangsin theefficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT asadalishah theefficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT nuveeprapasarakul theefficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT pawiyapupa efficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT prasertapiwatsiri efficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT wandeesirichokchatchawan efficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT nopadonpirarat efficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT nongnujmuangsin efficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT asadalishah efficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
AT nuveeprapasarakul efficacyofthreedoublemicroencapsulationmethodsforpreservationofprobioticbacteria
_version_ 1718378307233251328