Economic impact of pharmaceutical interventions on healthcare services from Brazil: a systematic review
Objective: The aim of this research was to systematically review the studies that investigated the economic impact of the pharmaceutical intervention in Brazilian healthcare services. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS databases to select the economic eval...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN PT |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ee1a2965a6604306bc879a32c548da65 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:ee1a2965a6604306bc879a32c548da65 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:ee1a2965a6604306bc879a32c548da652021-11-28T02:44:25ZEconomic impact of pharmaceutical interventions on healthcare services from Brazil: a systematic review10.30968/rbfhss.2020.114.05122179-59242316-7750https://doaj.org/article/ee1a2965a6604306bc879a32c548da652020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.rbfhss.org.br/sbrafh/article/view/512https://doaj.org/toc/2179-5924https://doaj.org/toc/2316-7750 Objective: The aim of this research was to systematically review the studies that investigated the economic impact of the pharmaceutical intervention in Brazilian healthcare services. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS databases to select the economic evaluations published until November 2019. Two independent authors selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality using the 19-items Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC-list) instrument and the reporting quality using the 24-items Consolidated Standards of Economic Health Assessment (CHEERS) checklist. Results: Out of the 290 identified articles, 10 met the eligibility criteria. Most studies were conducted in the southeastern region of Brazil (n=7) and significantly differed in design, economic outcome measure, and type of intervention. The majority (n=8) reported that pharmaceutical practice resulted in reduction of costs and clinical benefits to patients. In general, the methodological and the reporting qualities of the studies were low/moderate with an average score at CHEC-list of 10.3 (range: 3-16 points) and at CHEERS of 15.8 (range: 11-21 points). Conclusions: The Brazilian studies indicate that the pharmacist intervention can lead to economic and clinical benefits for healthcare services. The methodological and the reporting qualities of the studies were limiting factors. Gustavo B. TIGUMANRonaldo M. JUNIORSociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de SaúdearticlePublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270Pharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Therapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950ENPTRevista Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde, Vol 11, Iss 4 (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN PT |
topic |
Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Therapeutics. Pharmacology RM1-950 |
spellingShingle |
Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Therapeutics. Pharmacology RM1-950 Gustavo B. TIGUMAN Ronaldo M. JUNIOR Economic impact of pharmaceutical interventions on healthcare services from Brazil: a systematic review |
description |
Objective: The aim of this research was to systematically review the studies that investigated the economic impact of the pharmaceutical intervention in Brazilian healthcare services. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS databases to select the economic evaluations published until November 2019. Two independent authors selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality using the 19-items Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC-list) instrument and the reporting quality using the 24-items Consolidated Standards of Economic Health Assessment (CHEERS) checklist. Results: Out of the 290 identified articles, 10 met the eligibility criteria. Most studies were conducted in the southeastern region of Brazil (n=7) and significantly differed in design, economic outcome measure, and type of intervention. The majority (n=8) reported that pharmaceutical practice resulted in reduction of costs and clinical benefits to patients. In general, the methodological and the reporting qualities of the studies were low/moderate with an average score at CHEC-list of 10.3 (range: 3-16 points) and at CHEERS of 15.8 (range: 11-21 points). Conclusions: The Brazilian studies indicate that the pharmacist intervention can lead to economic and clinical benefits for healthcare services. The methodological and the reporting qualities of the studies were limiting factors.
|
format |
article |
author |
Gustavo B. TIGUMAN Ronaldo M. JUNIOR |
author_facet |
Gustavo B. TIGUMAN Ronaldo M. JUNIOR |
author_sort |
Gustavo B. TIGUMAN |
title |
Economic impact of pharmaceutical interventions on healthcare services from Brazil: a systematic review |
title_short |
Economic impact of pharmaceutical interventions on healthcare services from Brazil: a systematic review |
title_full |
Economic impact of pharmaceutical interventions on healthcare services from Brazil: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Economic impact of pharmaceutical interventions on healthcare services from Brazil: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic impact of pharmaceutical interventions on healthcare services from Brazil: a systematic review |
title_sort |
economic impact of pharmaceutical interventions on healthcare services from brazil: a systematic review |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/ee1a2965a6604306bc879a32c548da65 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gustavobtiguman economicimpactofpharmaceuticalinterventionsonhealthcareservicesfrombrazilasystematicreview AT ronaldomjunior economicimpactofpharmaceuticalinterventionsonhealthcareservicesfrombrazilasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1718408474133528576 |