Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan

Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan are among the highly developed countries in the UN e-Government Development Index. With a high rate of digitalization of public administration, solving the problems of citizens' access to the Internet and developing the electronic services sector, these countries...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	L. V. Smorgunov
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration 2021
Materias:	digital sovereignty internet governance institutions multilateral interaction stakeholder cooperation centralized management Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ee2d273d36df4a77b62ec24001fae8f5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ee2d273d36df4a77b62ec24001fae8f5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ee2d273d36df4a77b62ec24001fae8f52021-11-12T10:46:13ZPublic Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan1726-11391816-859010.22394/1726-1139-2020-12-24-39https://doaj.org/article/ee2d273d36df4a77b62ec24001fae8f52021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1588https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan are among the highly developed countries in the UN e-Government Development Index. With a high rate of digitalization of public administration, solving the problems of citizens' access to the Internet and developing the electronic services sector, these countries differ from each other in the design of a digitalization policy. The structure of digitalization projects in these countries includes all the necessary components — strategy, coordination, evaluation, intervention, but it is distinguished by a focus on digital change and a political infrastructure that ensures technology interference in the public sphere. Among the significant factors of digitalization policy in the described cases, the idea of sovereignty related to the Internet and digital technologies stands out. The general policy of the countries included in the Eurasian space of cooperation is expressed by the principle of “digital sovereignty”. The article analyses the general understanding of the principle of “digital sovereignty” and the various strategies for its implementation — “multilateral interaction”, “stakeholdercooperation” and “centralized management”, as well as the institutions of management that provide them.L. V. SmorgunovNorth-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration articledigital sovereigntyinternet governanceinstitutionsmultilateral interactionstakeholder cooperationcentralized managementPolitical institutions and public administration (General)JF20-2112ENRUУправленческое консультирование, Vol 0, Iss 12, Pp 24-39 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	digital sovereignty internet governance institutions multilateral interaction stakeholder cooperation centralized management Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112
spellingShingle	digital sovereignty internet governance institutions multilateral interaction stakeholder cooperation centralized management Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 L. V. Smorgunov Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan
description	Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan are among the highly developed countries in the UN e-Government Development Index. With a high rate of digitalization of public administration, solving the problems of citizens' access to the Internet and developing the electronic services sector, these countries differ from each other in the design of a digitalization policy. The structure of digitalization projects in these countries includes all the necessary components — strategy, coordination, evaluation, intervention, but it is distinguished by a focus on digital change and a political infrastructure that ensures technology interference in the public sphere. Among the significant factors of digitalization policy in the described cases, the idea of sovereignty related to the Internet and digital technologies stands out. The general policy of the countries included in the Eurasian space of cooperation is expressed by the principle of “digital sovereignty”. The article analyses the general understanding of the principle of “digital sovereignty” and the various strategies for its implementation — “multilateral interaction”, “stakeholdercooperation” and “centralized management”, as well as the institutions of management that provide them.
format	article
author	L. V. Smorgunov
author_facet	L. V. Smorgunov
author_sort	L. V. Smorgunov
title	Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan
title_short	Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan
title_full	Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan
title_fullStr	Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan
title_full_unstemmed	Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan
title_sort	public internet governance institutes: comparative analysis of russia, belarus and kazakhstan
publisher	North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/ee2d273d36df4a77b62ec24001fae8f5
work_keys_str_mv	AT lvsmorgunov publicinternetgovernanceinstitutescomparativeanalysisofrussiabelarusandkazakhstan
_version_	1718430714559463424

Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan

Ejemplares similares