The Efficacy Between Conventional Lid Hygiene and Additional Thermal Pulsatile System in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Patients Treated with Long-Term Anti-Glaucoma Medications in a Randomized Controlled Trial

Ngamjit Kasetsuwan, Disorn Suwajanakorn, Chitchanok Tantipat, Usanee Reinprayoon Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, ThailandCorrespondence: Chitchanok TantipatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasetsuwan N, Suwajanakorn D, Tantipat C, Reinprayoon U
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ee606f0c9dc3452d9c87d8e3302d4cf1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ee606f0c9dc3452d9c87d8e3302d4cf1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ee606f0c9dc3452d9c87d8e3302d4cf12021-12-02T10:41:45ZThe Efficacy Between Conventional Lid Hygiene and Additional Thermal Pulsatile System in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Patients Treated with Long-Term Anti-Glaucoma Medications in a Randomized Controlled Trial1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/ee606f0c9dc3452d9c87d8e3302d4cf12020-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-between-conventional-lid-hygiene-and-additional-thermal-p-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Ngamjit Kasetsuwan, Disorn Suwajanakorn, Chitchanok Tantipat, Usanee Reinprayoon Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, ThailandCorrespondence: Chitchanok TantipatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, ThailandTel +66-86-111-8524Fax +66-2-252-8290Email chitchanok.tob88@gmail.comPurpose: To evaluate the efficacy of additional thermal pulsatile system compared to standard lid hygiene alone in meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) patients who are using long-term anti-glaucoma medications.Patients and Methods: Well-controlled glaucoma patients who used anti-glaucoma medications for at least 1 year and had MGD were enrolled and randomized between a study group who received thermal pulsatile system (Lipiflow®) treatment and standard lid hygiene, and a control group who received standard lid hygiene alone. The primary outcome was meibomian gland expression score, and the secondary outcomes were the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score, Schirmer test score, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal staining score, lipid layer thickness (LLT), and meibography score. All the outcomes were re-evaluated at 1 week, then at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.Results: Of 60 participants who underwent randomization, 48 completed the study. At the 6-month mark, this study could not demonstrate any significant difference between groups in both primary and secondary outcomes. However, there was significant improvement from baseline in both groups of the following outcomes: meibomian gland expression score, OSDI score, LLT, and meibography score. No serious adverse event was found in this study.Conclusion: An additional single thermal pulsatile system treatment with standard lid hygiene significantly improved meibomian gland assessment score and subjective symptoms at 6 months. Any difference between additional thermal pulsatile system treatment and lid hygiene alone was not found in this study. The results may suggest more chronic MGD and more damaged meibomian gland induced by long-term anti-glaucoma medications.Keywords: meibomian gland dysfunction, anti-glaucoma medications, Lipiflow®, thermal pulsatile system, lid hygieneKasetsuwan NSuwajanakorn DTantipat CReinprayoon UDove Medical Pressarticlemeibomian gland dysfunctionanti-glaucoma medicationslipiflow®thermal pulsatile systemlid hygieneOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 14, Pp 2891-2902 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic meibomian gland dysfunction
anti-glaucoma medications
lipiflow®
thermal pulsatile system
lid hygiene
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle meibomian gland dysfunction
anti-glaucoma medications
lipiflow®
thermal pulsatile system
lid hygiene
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Kasetsuwan N
Suwajanakorn D
Tantipat C
Reinprayoon U
The Efficacy Between Conventional Lid Hygiene and Additional Thermal Pulsatile System in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Patients Treated with Long-Term Anti-Glaucoma Medications in a Randomized Controlled Trial
description Ngamjit Kasetsuwan, Disorn Suwajanakorn, Chitchanok Tantipat, Usanee Reinprayoon Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, ThailandCorrespondence: Chitchanok TantipatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, ThailandTel +66-86-111-8524Fax +66-2-252-8290Email chitchanok.tob88@gmail.comPurpose: To evaluate the efficacy of additional thermal pulsatile system compared to standard lid hygiene alone in meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) patients who are using long-term anti-glaucoma medications.Patients and Methods: Well-controlled glaucoma patients who used anti-glaucoma medications for at least 1 year and had MGD were enrolled and randomized between a study group who received thermal pulsatile system (Lipiflow®) treatment and standard lid hygiene, and a control group who received standard lid hygiene alone. The primary outcome was meibomian gland expression score, and the secondary outcomes were the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score, Schirmer test score, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal staining score, lipid layer thickness (LLT), and meibography score. All the outcomes were re-evaluated at 1 week, then at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.Results: Of 60 participants who underwent randomization, 48 completed the study. At the 6-month mark, this study could not demonstrate any significant difference between groups in both primary and secondary outcomes. However, there was significant improvement from baseline in both groups of the following outcomes: meibomian gland expression score, OSDI score, LLT, and meibography score. No serious adverse event was found in this study.Conclusion: An additional single thermal pulsatile system treatment with standard lid hygiene significantly improved meibomian gland assessment score and subjective symptoms at 6 months. Any difference between additional thermal pulsatile system treatment and lid hygiene alone was not found in this study. The results may suggest more chronic MGD and more damaged meibomian gland induced by long-term anti-glaucoma medications.Keywords: meibomian gland dysfunction, anti-glaucoma medications, Lipiflow®, thermal pulsatile system, lid hygiene
format article
author Kasetsuwan N
Suwajanakorn D
Tantipat C
Reinprayoon U
author_facet Kasetsuwan N
Suwajanakorn D
Tantipat C
Reinprayoon U
author_sort Kasetsuwan N
title The Efficacy Between Conventional Lid Hygiene and Additional Thermal Pulsatile System in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Patients Treated with Long-Term Anti-Glaucoma Medications in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short The Efficacy Between Conventional Lid Hygiene and Additional Thermal Pulsatile System in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Patients Treated with Long-Term Anti-Glaucoma Medications in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full The Efficacy Between Conventional Lid Hygiene and Additional Thermal Pulsatile System in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Patients Treated with Long-Term Anti-Glaucoma Medications in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Efficacy Between Conventional Lid Hygiene and Additional Thermal Pulsatile System in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Patients Treated with Long-Term Anti-Glaucoma Medications in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy Between Conventional Lid Hygiene and Additional Thermal Pulsatile System in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Patients Treated with Long-Term Anti-Glaucoma Medications in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort efficacy between conventional lid hygiene and additional thermal pulsatile system in meibomian gland dysfunction patients treated with long-term anti-glaucoma medications in a randomized controlled trial
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/ee606f0c9dc3452d9c87d8e3302d4cf1
work_keys_str_mv AT kasetsuwann theefficacybetweenconventionallidhygieneandadditionalthermalpulsatilesysteminmeibomianglanddysfunctionpatientstreatedwithlongtermantiglaucomamedicationsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suwajanakornd theefficacybetweenconventionallidhygieneandadditionalthermalpulsatilesysteminmeibomianglanddysfunctionpatientstreatedwithlongtermantiglaucomamedicationsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tantipatc theefficacybetweenconventionallidhygieneandadditionalthermalpulsatilesysteminmeibomianglanddysfunctionpatientstreatedwithlongtermantiglaucomamedicationsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reinprayoonu theefficacybetweenconventionallidhygieneandadditionalthermalpulsatilesysteminmeibomianglanddysfunctionpatientstreatedwithlongtermantiglaucomamedicationsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kasetsuwann efficacybetweenconventionallidhygieneandadditionalthermalpulsatilesysteminmeibomianglanddysfunctionpatientstreatedwithlongtermantiglaucomamedicationsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suwajanakornd efficacybetweenconventionallidhygieneandadditionalthermalpulsatilesysteminmeibomianglanddysfunctionpatientstreatedwithlongtermantiglaucomamedicationsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tantipatc efficacybetweenconventionallidhygieneandadditionalthermalpulsatilesysteminmeibomianglanddysfunctionpatientstreatedwithlongtermantiglaucomamedicationsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reinprayoonu efficacybetweenconventionallidhygieneandadditionalthermalpulsatilesysteminmeibomianglanddysfunctionpatientstreatedwithlongtermantiglaucomamedicationsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718396861737336832