Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 2014

Abstract The prevalence of depression may be affected by changes in psychiatric practices and the availability of online mental health information in the past two decades. This study aimed to evaluate the aggregate prevalence of depression in communities from different countries between 1994 and 201...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grace Y. Lim, Wilson W. Tam, Yanxia Lu, Cyrus S. Ho, Melvyn W. Zhang, Roger C. Ho
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ee61b33240fd420bb37d0856825aa280
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ee61b33240fd420bb37d0856825aa280
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ee61b33240fd420bb37d0856825aa2802021-12-02T15:08:54ZPrevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 201410.1038/s41598-018-21243-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/ee61b33240fd420bb37d0856825aa2802018-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21243-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The prevalence of depression may be affected by changes in psychiatric practices and the availability of online mental health information in the past two decades. This study aimed to evaluate the aggregate prevalence of depression in communities from different countries between 1994 and 2014 and to explore the variations in prevalence stratified by geographical, methodological and socio-economic factors. A total of 90 studies were identified and met the inclusion criteria (n = 1,112,573 adults) with 68 studies on single point prevalence, 9 studies on one-year prevalence, and 13 studies on lifetime prevalence of depression. A random-effects model meta-analysis that was performed to calculate the aggregate point, one-year and lifetime prevalence of depression calculated prevalences of 12.9%, 7.2% and 10.8% respectively. Point prevalence of depression was significantly higher in women (14.4%), countries with a medium human development index (HDI) (29.2%), studies published from 2004 to 2014 (15.4%) and when using self-reporting instruments (17.3%) to assess depression. Heterogeneity was identified by meta-regression and subgroup analysis, and response rate, percentage of women and year of publication, respectively, were determined contribute to depression prevalence. This meta-analysis allows benchmarking of the prevalence of depression during the era when online health information emerged, facilitating future comparisons.Grace Y. LimWilson W. TamYanxia LuCyrus S. HoMelvyn W. ZhangRoger C. HoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Grace Y. Lim
Wilson W. Tam
Yanxia Lu
Cyrus S. Ho
Melvyn W. Zhang
Roger C. Ho
Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 2014
description Abstract The prevalence of depression may be affected by changes in psychiatric practices and the availability of online mental health information in the past two decades. This study aimed to evaluate the aggregate prevalence of depression in communities from different countries between 1994 and 2014 and to explore the variations in prevalence stratified by geographical, methodological and socio-economic factors. A total of 90 studies were identified and met the inclusion criteria (n = 1,112,573 adults) with 68 studies on single point prevalence, 9 studies on one-year prevalence, and 13 studies on lifetime prevalence of depression. A random-effects model meta-analysis that was performed to calculate the aggregate point, one-year and lifetime prevalence of depression calculated prevalences of 12.9%, 7.2% and 10.8% respectively. Point prevalence of depression was significantly higher in women (14.4%), countries with a medium human development index (HDI) (29.2%), studies published from 2004 to 2014 (15.4%) and when using self-reporting instruments (17.3%) to assess depression. Heterogeneity was identified by meta-regression and subgroup analysis, and response rate, percentage of women and year of publication, respectively, were determined contribute to depression prevalence. This meta-analysis allows benchmarking of the prevalence of depression during the era when online health information emerged, facilitating future comparisons.
format article
author Grace Y. Lim
Wilson W. Tam
Yanxia Lu
Cyrus S. Ho
Melvyn W. Zhang
Roger C. Ho
author_facet Grace Y. Lim
Wilson W. Tam
Yanxia Lu
Cyrus S. Ho
Melvyn W. Zhang
Roger C. Ho
author_sort Grace Y. Lim
title Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 2014
title_short Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 2014
title_full Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 2014
title_fullStr Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 2014
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 2014
title_sort prevalence of depression in the community from 30 countries between 1994 and 2014
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/ee61b33240fd420bb37d0856825aa280
work_keys_str_mv AT graceylim prevalenceofdepressioninthecommunityfrom30countriesbetween1994and2014
AT wilsonwtam prevalenceofdepressioninthecommunityfrom30countriesbetween1994and2014
AT yanxialu prevalenceofdepressioninthecommunityfrom30countriesbetween1994and2014
AT cyrussho prevalenceofdepressioninthecommunityfrom30countriesbetween1994and2014
AT melvynwzhang prevalenceofdepressioninthecommunityfrom30countriesbetween1994and2014
AT rogercho prevalenceofdepressioninthecommunityfrom30countriesbetween1994and2014
_version_ 1718387973373820928