Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.

Differentiation of logopenic (lvPPA) and nonfluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia is important yet remains challenging since it hinges on expert based evaluation of speech and language production. In this study acoustic measures of speech in conjunction with voxel-based...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirrie J Ballard, Sharon Savage, Cristian E Leyton, Adam P Vogel, Michael Hornberger, John R Hodges
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eeb4aa0388b547feb1ed5dae60e89589
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eeb4aa0388b547feb1ed5dae60e89589
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eeb4aa0388b547feb1ed5dae60e895892021-11-18T08:30:28ZLogopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0089864https://doaj.org/article/eeb4aa0388b547feb1ed5dae60e895892014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24587083/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Differentiation of logopenic (lvPPA) and nonfluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia is important yet remains challenging since it hinges on expert based evaluation of speech and language production. In this study acoustic measures of speech in conjunction with voxel-based morphometry were used to determine the success of the measures as an adjunct to diagnosis and to explore the neural basis of apraxia of speech in nfvPPA. Forty-one patients (21 lvPPA, 20 nfvPPA) were recruited from a consecutive sample with suspected frontotemporal dementia. Patients were diagnosed using the current gold-standard of expert perceptual judgment, based on presence/absence of particular speech features during speaking tasks. Seventeen healthy age-matched adults served as controls. MRI scans were available for 11 control and 37 PPA cases; 23 of the PPA cases underwent amyloid ligand PET imaging. Measures, corresponding to perceptual features of apraxia of speech, were periods of silence during reading and relative vowel duration and intensity in polysyllable word repetition. Discriminant function analyses revealed that a measure of relative vowel duration differentiated nfvPPA cases from both control and lvPPA cases (r(2) = 0.47) with 88% agreement with expert judgment of presence of apraxia of speech in nfvPPA cases. VBM analysis showed that relative vowel duration covaried with grey matter intensity in areas critical for speech motor planning and programming: precentral gyrus, supplementary motor area and inferior frontal gyrus bilaterally, only affected in the nfvPPA group. This bilateral involvement of frontal speech networks in nfvPPA potentially affects access to compensatory mechanisms involving right hemisphere homologues. Measures of silences during reading also discriminated the PPA and control groups, but did not increase predictive accuracy. Findings suggest that a measure of relative vowel duration from of a polysyllable word repetition task may be sufficient for detecting most cases of apraxia of speech and distinguishing between nfvPPA and lvPPA.Kirrie J BallardSharon SavageCristian E LeytonAdam P VogelMichael HornbergerJohn R HodgesPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 2, p e89864 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Kirrie J Ballard
Sharon Savage
Cristian E Leyton
Adam P Vogel
Michael Hornberger
John R Hodges
Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.
description Differentiation of logopenic (lvPPA) and nonfluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia is important yet remains challenging since it hinges on expert based evaluation of speech and language production. In this study acoustic measures of speech in conjunction with voxel-based morphometry were used to determine the success of the measures as an adjunct to diagnosis and to explore the neural basis of apraxia of speech in nfvPPA. Forty-one patients (21 lvPPA, 20 nfvPPA) were recruited from a consecutive sample with suspected frontotemporal dementia. Patients were diagnosed using the current gold-standard of expert perceptual judgment, based on presence/absence of particular speech features during speaking tasks. Seventeen healthy age-matched adults served as controls. MRI scans were available for 11 control and 37 PPA cases; 23 of the PPA cases underwent amyloid ligand PET imaging. Measures, corresponding to perceptual features of apraxia of speech, were periods of silence during reading and relative vowel duration and intensity in polysyllable word repetition. Discriminant function analyses revealed that a measure of relative vowel duration differentiated nfvPPA cases from both control and lvPPA cases (r(2) = 0.47) with 88% agreement with expert judgment of presence of apraxia of speech in nfvPPA cases. VBM analysis showed that relative vowel duration covaried with grey matter intensity in areas critical for speech motor planning and programming: precentral gyrus, supplementary motor area and inferior frontal gyrus bilaterally, only affected in the nfvPPA group. This bilateral involvement of frontal speech networks in nfvPPA potentially affects access to compensatory mechanisms involving right hemisphere homologues. Measures of silences during reading also discriminated the PPA and control groups, but did not increase predictive accuracy. Findings suggest that a measure of relative vowel duration from of a polysyllable word repetition task may be sufficient for detecting most cases of apraxia of speech and distinguishing between nfvPPA and lvPPA.
format article
author Kirrie J Ballard
Sharon Savage
Cristian E Leyton
Adam P Vogel
Michael Hornberger
John R Hodges
author_facet Kirrie J Ballard
Sharon Savage
Cristian E Leyton
Adam P Vogel
Michael Hornberger
John R Hodges
author_sort Kirrie J Ballard
title Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.
title_short Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.
title_full Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.
title_fullStr Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.
title_full_unstemmed Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.
title_sort logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/eeb4aa0388b547feb1ed5dae60e89589
work_keys_str_mv AT kirriejballard logopenicandnonfluentvariantsofprimaryprogressiveaphasiaaredifferentiatedbyacousticmeasuresofspeechproduction
AT sharonsavage logopenicandnonfluentvariantsofprimaryprogressiveaphasiaaredifferentiatedbyacousticmeasuresofspeechproduction
AT cristianeleyton logopenicandnonfluentvariantsofprimaryprogressiveaphasiaaredifferentiatedbyacousticmeasuresofspeechproduction
AT adampvogel logopenicandnonfluentvariantsofprimaryprogressiveaphasiaaredifferentiatedbyacousticmeasuresofspeechproduction
AT michaelhornberger logopenicandnonfluentvariantsofprimaryprogressiveaphasiaaredifferentiatedbyacousticmeasuresofspeechproduction
AT johnrhodges logopenicandnonfluentvariantsofprimaryprogressiveaphasiaaredifferentiatedbyacousticmeasuresofspeechproduction
_version_ 1718421717954592768