Significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma
Milena Pahlitzsch,1 Necip Torun,1 Carl Erb,2 Jeanette Bruenner,1 Anna Karina B Maier,1 Johannes Gonnermann,1 Eckart Bertelmann,1 Matthias K J Klamann1 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Charité, Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, 2Augenklinik am Wittenbergplatz, Berlin, German...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/eee4660c108d4cc9aaad8d3729155244 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Milena Pahlitzsch,1 Necip Torun,1 Carl Erb,2 Jeanette Bruenner,1 Anna Karina B Maier,1 Johannes Gonnermann,1 Eckart Bertelmann,1 Matthias K J Klamann1 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Charité, Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, 2Augenklinik am Wittenbergplatz, Berlin, Germany Purpose: To assess the correlation between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3, and optic coherence tomography in preperimetric glaucoma. Methods: One-hundred-twenty-five patients with preperimetric primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (n=30) were included (mean age 58.9±15.9 years). All three devices graded the optic disc topography: Diagnosis 1 was defined as “outside normal limits”, while Diagnosis 2 as “borderline or outside normal limits”. Results: For Diagnosis 1, a significant correlation was shown between DDLS and Moorfields regression analysis (P=0.022), and for Diagnosis 2 with glaucoma probability score analysis (P=0.024), in POAG. In pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, DDLS did not correlate significantly with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and optic coherence tomography. Regarding the area under the curve the highest predictive power was demonstrated by the objective DDLS (0.513–0.824) compared to Burk (0.239–0.343) and Mikelberg (0.093–0.270) coefficients. Conclusions: The DDLS showed a significant correlation to the Moorfields regression analysis in preperimetric POAG. The objective DDLS showed the highest predictive power and thus is an additive tool in diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma. Keywords: DDLS, preperimetric glaucoma, optic coherence tomography, stereophotography, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph |
|---|