Predictability of Residual Postoperative Astigmatism After Implantation of a Toric Intraocular Lens Using Two Different Calculators

Seth M Pantanelli,1 Neal Kansara,1 Gerard Smits2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA; 2Computer and Statistical Consultants Incorporated, Santa Barbara, CA, USACorrespondence: Seth M PantanelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, 500...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pantanelli SM, Kansara N, Smits G
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eef10c681afd4015991ddcd43a4c0ff7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eef10c681afd4015991ddcd43a4c0ff7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eef10c681afd4015991ddcd43a4c0ff72021-12-02T10:22:49ZPredictability of Residual Postoperative Astigmatism After Implantation of a Toric Intraocular Lens Using Two Different Calculators1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/eef10c681afd4015991ddcd43a4c0ff72020-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/predictability-of-residual-postoperative-astigmatism-after-implantatio-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Seth M Pantanelli,1 Neal Kansara,1 Gerard Smits2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA; 2Computer and Statistical Consultants Incorporated, Santa Barbara, CA, USACorrespondence: Seth M PantanelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive; HU19, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USATel +1 717-531-5690Fax +1 717-531-5009Email spantanelli@pennstatehealth.psu.eduPurpose: To compare predictability of postoperative refractive astigmatism (RA) using the Emmetropic Verifying Optical (EVO) Toric Formula v2.0 to one that accounts only for anterior corneal astigmatism.Methods: This is a secondary analysis of de-identified data from a clinical trial including 9 sites across the United States. Preoperative biometry was used to predict postoperative RA with the implanted toric IOL using legacy enVista and EVO online calculators. The RA prediction error was computed between back-calculated postoperative RA and predicted residual RA. Outcome measures included vector (centroid) and arithmetic mean RA prediction error.Results: Comparison of calculators was based on 109 eyes, 97 (89%) of which were implanted with a toric IOL with an effective astigmatism power of 1.4 D or less. Centroid of the RA prediction errors was 0.37 D @ 178 and 0.17 D @ 090 for the legacy and EVO calculators, respectively (p < 0.0001). The proportion of eyes with an absolute RA prediction error ≤ 0.5 was 47.3% and 49.1% (p = 0.78), while the proportion of eyes ≤ 1.0 D was 82.7% and 89.1% (p = 0.03). Differences in the proportions ≤ 0.5 D existed for WTR (p = 0.015) but not ATR (p = 0.75) eyes. The proportion in which orientation of the predicted RA (ATR, WTR, or oblique) matched the actual RA was 62% and 78% for legacy and EVO calculators, respectively (p = 0.0029).Conclusion: The EVO Toric Formula v2.0 out-performed the legacy calculator with regards to predictions in eyes with low astigmatism.Keywords: cataract, toric, intraocular lens power, astigmatism, calculators, EVOPantanelli SMKansara NSmits GDove Medical Pressarticlecataracttoricintraocular lens powerastigmatismcalculatorsevo OphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 14, Pp 3627-3634 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cataract
toric
intraocular lens power
astigmatism
calculators
evo 
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle cataract
toric
intraocular lens power
astigmatism
calculators
evo 
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Pantanelli SM
Kansara N
Smits G
Predictability of Residual Postoperative Astigmatism After Implantation of a Toric Intraocular Lens Using Two Different Calculators
description Seth M Pantanelli,1 Neal Kansara,1 Gerard Smits2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA; 2Computer and Statistical Consultants Incorporated, Santa Barbara, CA, USACorrespondence: Seth M PantanelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive; HU19, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USATel +1 717-531-5690Fax +1 717-531-5009Email spantanelli@pennstatehealth.psu.eduPurpose: To compare predictability of postoperative refractive astigmatism (RA) using the Emmetropic Verifying Optical (EVO) Toric Formula v2.0 to one that accounts only for anterior corneal astigmatism.Methods: This is a secondary analysis of de-identified data from a clinical trial including 9 sites across the United States. Preoperative biometry was used to predict postoperative RA with the implanted toric IOL using legacy enVista and EVO online calculators. The RA prediction error was computed between back-calculated postoperative RA and predicted residual RA. Outcome measures included vector (centroid) and arithmetic mean RA prediction error.Results: Comparison of calculators was based on 109 eyes, 97 (89%) of which were implanted with a toric IOL with an effective astigmatism power of 1.4 D or less. Centroid of the RA prediction errors was 0.37 D @ 178 and 0.17 D @ 090 for the legacy and EVO calculators, respectively (p < 0.0001). The proportion of eyes with an absolute RA prediction error ≤ 0.5 was 47.3% and 49.1% (p = 0.78), while the proportion of eyes ≤ 1.0 D was 82.7% and 89.1% (p = 0.03). Differences in the proportions ≤ 0.5 D existed for WTR (p = 0.015) but not ATR (p = 0.75) eyes. The proportion in which orientation of the predicted RA (ATR, WTR, or oblique) matched the actual RA was 62% and 78% for legacy and EVO calculators, respectively (p = 0.0029).Conclusion: The EVO Toric Formula v2.0 out-performed the legacy calculator with regards to predictions in eyes with low astigmatism.Keywords: cataract, toric, intraocular lens power, astigmatism, calculators, EVO
format article
author Pantanelli SM
Kansara N
Smits G
author_facet Pantanelli SM
Kansara N
Smits G
author_sort Pantanelli SM
title Predictability of Residual Postoperative Astigmatism After Implantation of a Toric Intraocular Lens Using Two Different Calculators
title_short Predictability of Residual Postoperative Astigmatism After Implantation of a Toric Intraocular Lens Using Two Different Calculators
title_full Predictability of Residual Postoperative Astigmatism After Implantation of a Toric Intraocular Lens Using Two Different Calculators
title_fullStr Predictability of Residual Postoperative Astigmatism After Implantation of a Toric Intraocular Lens Using Two Different Calculators
title_full_unstemmed Predictability of Residual Postoperative Astigmatism After Implantation of a Toric Intraocular Lens Using Two Different Calculators
title_sort predictability of residual postoperative astigmatism after implantation of a toric intraocular lens using two different calculators
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/eef10c681afd4015991ddcd43a4c0ff7
work_keys_str_mv AT pantanellism predictabilityofresidualpostoperativeastigmatismafterimplantationofatoricintraocularlensusingtwodifferentcalculators
AT kansaran predictabilityofresidualpostoperativeastigmatismafterimplantationofatoricintraocularlensusingtwodifferentcalculators
AT smitsg predictabilityofresidualpostoperativeastigmatismafterimplantationofatoricintraocularlensusingtwodifferentcalculators
_version_ 1718397385603809280